[Blindtlk] Uncollated and Unbound Braille Material
S L Johnson
SLJohnson25 at comcast.net
Sat Dec 10 19:23:41 UTC 2016
Hello:
I can speak to this a bit because my local pharmacist and I have been
discussing how to get the Braille prescription labels for me. As I
understand it, the pharmacies who use the system to provide Braille labels
get a printer to hook up to their computer system. That prints out the
labels and any accompanying information just like the print papers given to
the sighted public. Those pharmacists do not know Braille nor do they have
proof readers on staff every time a blind person orders their meds. Their
job is to get the medications out to you as soon as possible. They do not
have the time to send the document out to be proof read and bound. Also,
that would cost way to much money just to fill a prescription. As for the
sighted, all they get is a bunch of papers thrown into their bag along with
their meds. They are not collated or stapled in any particular order. I
think you are asking too much for prescription information. If it were an
important lengthy document, then I can see making a fuss but for the stuff
that comes with your prescriptions, you are making too much out of it. Be
glad that we now have this information available to us. Things might not be
perfect but it is a lot better than it used to be.
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Donahue via blindtlk
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 11:20 AM
To: steve.jacobson at visi.com ; Blind Talk Mailing List
Cc: Peter Donahue
Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] Uncollated and Unbound Braille Material
Hello Steve and everyone,
As previously mentioned we've been to national conventions and have
been given Braille material that first needed to be put in order before
it could be read. It's still the NFB's responsibility to be an example
of how Braille should be presented to the blind. The Education Service
Center, the Via Metropolitan Transit Authority, and the San Antonio
Lighthouse for the Blind deliver Braille publications colated, bound,
and ready to read. Nothing less will do! All the best.
Peter Donahue
Steve Jacobson via blindtlk wrote:
> Peter,
>
> While I tend to agree with Brian and Mike, I would like to propose some
> thoughts on this and see what your reaction is. Your statement that
> sighted
> people wouldn't accept documents that are not collated really doesn't
> apply
> to this directly. For example, the information I have seen that
> accompanies
> a prescription in print is not colated at all. In fact, how it is printed
> is not all that consistent. We routinely receive information in the mail
> that consists of multiple sheets of information, sometimes folded
> together,
> but not bound. Printed prescription information is sometimes on the label
> attached to the bottle and sometimes also on a sheet from which the bottle
> label was printed. Such documents are printed and mailed quickly along
> with
> the order. They often are not even stapled in my experience.
>
> As you know, one of the issues we have is that braille takes up more space
> and is printed on heavier paper. This can mean that what we receive in
> braille may well be more of a document than text printed on a couple of
> unbound print pages. This means that the people making these decisions
> are
> not even going to think in terms of binding documents since it is not at
> all
> a consideration for their print documents. Further, those producing
> braille
> are likely going to have a flat charge for binding that is based more on
> the
> number of volumes rather than the number of pages. Therefore, binding a
> small document as are prescription warnings, is going to add significantly
> to the cost of brailling each document.
>
> Therefore, it seems to me that we have to be careful about drawing the
> parallels you draw between collating print and braille documents and give
> some consideration if it is worth the increased cost of making braille
> available in all cases. With all of the issues that face us, I just can't
> see mounting a national campaign, especially when you will probably read
> the
> document once and throw it away. We just have to think these things
> through.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Steve Jacobson
> I
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blindtlk [mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Peter
> Donahue via blindtlk
> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 10:32 PM
> To: 'National Association to Promote the Use of Braille Mailing List'
> <napub at nfbnet.org>
> Cc: Peter Donahue <pdonahue2 at satx.rr.com>; 'Blind Talk Mailing List'
> <blindtlk at nfbnet.org>
> Subject: [Blindtlk] Uncollated and Unbound Braille Material
>
> Good evening everyone,
>
>
> This afternoon, in addition to receiving two prescription
> medicines from CVS/Caremark Mail Order Service, I also received some
> braille
> documentation describing the dangers and the side effects of the two
> medicines. While I appreciated CVS/Caremark including the subscription
> information in braille, the pages were unbound and uncollated. Would we
> stand for that if we were sighted? Absolutely not!
>
>
> Needless to say, I called CVS/Caremark Customer Service.
> There was not much the representative could do, so she transferred me to
> one
> of her managers named Orion. Orion sent an email directly to the pharmacy
> since the pharmacy was responsible for packing and shipping the medicines
> to
> me.
>
>
> We have received such unbound and uncollated
> documentation
> from our local transit service, and for the past year, any documentation
> we
> receive has been collated and bound properly. In addition, when the Texas
> Division of Blind Services was the Texas Commission for the Blind, I
> received an unbound, uncollated document. Even NFB has given out
> uncollated,
> unbound documentation at national conventions.
>
>
> I strongly urge that if any of you use CVS/Caremark as
> your
> subscription drug provider, or if you receive braille documentation from
> any
> other groups, please call and/or send them a letter or email. We do not
> need
> to tolerate unbound, uncollated pages. I know if I transcribed and
> proofread
> such documentation, I would make sure the pages were collagted and bound
> before shipping.
>
>
> At any rate, those are my two cents on this matter.
> Here's
> hoping you enjoy the rest of your weekend!
>
>
> Mary Donahue
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindtlk mailing list
> blindtlk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindtlk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/steve.jacobson%40visi.
> com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindtlk mailing list
> blindtlk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindtlk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/pdonahue2%40satx.rr.com
>
_______________________________________________
blindtlk mailing list
blindtlk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindtlk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/sljohnson25%40comcast.net
More information about the BlindTlk
mailing list