[blparent] Subject: Original Sin
Marianne Haas
advocate at earthlink.net
Sat Jul 22 16:03:41 UTC 2017
Good Morning,
This individual was thrown off other lists already. Unfortunately, he collects emails. I am finding him harassing. Moderator, please take him off the list and block his emails.
Respectfully,
Marianne
-----Original Message-----
From: BlParent [mailto:blparent-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Tara Briggs via BlParent
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 6:58 AM
To: Blind Parents Mailing List
Cc: Tara Briggs
Subject: Re: [blparent] Subject: Original Sin
This subject is off-topic. I know I'm not a moderator, but do you guys think you could please take it off the list. I understand that this list is to discuss parenting is blind people. Not politics.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 22, 2017, at 7:03 AM, Bob Evans via BlParent <blparent at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>
> Hello, thank you for your response. I just would like to append
> further assertions. Based on your stark reluctance to tackle any of my
> theological challenges, it is considered an implicit defeatism for
> your camp. Protestants are not more than mere servants to Zionism. And
> as for your Christology devotion, it is considerably undistinguished.
> Your endorsement to the apartheid Zionist state is intrinsically
> inalienable. Thence, our duty is to incessantly engage with you in
> relentless combat missions until your party is perfectly discomfited.
> Your ministry doesn’t base its tenets on nothing but an oblique hope
> of a theoretical scheme of salvation. The assumption that someone
> could have died for your sin is substantially Laputan and
> consequently, it is unlikely to be rectifiable. In Trump’s damnable
> era, your state of dismay has just started. Americanisation is quite
> fragile and its global leadership is about to diminish. Your oval
> office is rotten to the core. Jews have constantly been dominating
> your denomination since Martin Luther era and even earlier to that
> time. There are many Muslims whom I knew have abandoned Islam to
> Christianity. Nevertheless, I never fathomed the relationship between
> becoming Christian, residing in the States and endorsing Zionists. I
> wish you have got sufficient courage to tackle this challenge in the
> slightest. I urge you to ponder properly on what I proposed. If you
> ever perceived the demand to clarify what might be vague to you,
> kindly, keep me notified. Best wishes, Bob
>
>
>
>
>> On 7/21/17, Marty Purvis <wuas at wake-up.org> wrote:
>> Hello Mostafa:
>>
>> Thank you for your email.
>>
>> Our views on religious matters are very far apart.
>> So far, that further discussion would most likely be fruitless.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Larry Wilson
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Contact Page Message <
>> postmaster at wake-up.org> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Mostafa, technically Bob <ebob824 at gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Original Sin
>>>
>>> Visitor's Message:
>>> Hello. I am Mostafa Almahdy. Bob Evans is just a technical name. I
>>> used to be called so when I worked at an American call centre here
>>> in Cairo. So, it is still my name. In the subsequent segment, I’ll
>>> present the Christian narrative of Original Sin in addition to
>>> posing crucial queries and denotative rebuttals. What is Original
>>> Sin in Christianity? It is a sin said to be inherited by all
>>> descendants of Adam. When Adam and Eve sinned, death entered to the
>>> world. Thence, God demanded to be paid to redeem humanity. He then
>>> sacrificed his only begotten son to ransom us. This account may
>>> ostensibly seem to be reasonable. Be that as it may, it contains
>>> major defects. First of which, it portrays the divine with
>>> imperfection. It doesn’t recognise his omnipotence. Why? Because
>>> according to this theology, he demanded to be paid in order to
>>> redeem. At its inception, I have couple of questions for clergy.
>>> First, has Adam been destined to be eternal in Eden? Second, when he
>>> committed his ever first sin, why hasn’t he been given one chance to
>>> repent? Third, when Adam ate from the tree of knowing good and evil,
>>> he became like God according to Genesis. A question here, has he
>>> been punished because he became aware of good and evil? It is
>>> assumed that he didn’t know good and evil until he ate from the tree
>>> of knowing good and evil. So, how could God punish an innocent? And
>>> as for sin inheritance, if a man and a woman committed adultery,
>>> could we possibly hold their child accountable for what they have
>>> done? This is the precise logic exploited in Christian concept of
>>> Original Sin. And as for redemption and forfeiture, if God was paid
>>> to redeem, how could he still forgive? If I supposedly wounded
>>> someone, does he has the right to retaliate? Yes, he certainly does.
>>> And, if he wanted to forgive me, could he still retaliate? No, he
>>> surely couldn’t. It’s either forgiveness or retaliation, it couldn’t
>>> be both. And as for Christ, how could an innocent bear the guilty’s
>>> iniquity? According to traditional Christian theology, death entered
>>> to the world when Adam and Eve sinned.
>>> Therefore, someone had to die for this. He had to be impeccant and,
>>> he had to die forever. Christians preach that Jesus is the one who
>>> paid for this.
>>> The question is, did he die forever? According to Christian story,
>>> he died for three days. Well actually, he died for less than that if
>>> you think of it a bit. Jesus’s date of Crucifixion and resurrection
>>> differs from gospel to another. Please, don’t take my word for this.
>>> I urge you to just check John nineteen and Mark fifteen. Most
>>> Christians today believe that Jesus died on a Friday afternoon and
>>> risen on a fine Easter Sunday morning. As for Adventists, they do
>>> not believe in this. They even have their Sabbath held on Saturday.
>>> Christian innovation of Original Sin is remarkably exposed. I urge
>>> southern laity and their associates to genuinely ponder on the
>>> scenario encountered in Christian theology. If Adam sinned and we
>>> were contagiously destined to be anathematised eternally, why didn’t
>>> Jesus die forever then? I believe that my points are critical and
>>> thus, they deserve thorough attention. It is a bit odd to just rely
>>> on the thought that someone theoretically died for my sins and then,
>>> go do whatever I want.
>>> We
>>> bear witness western Christians who basically don’t care about what
>>> they do. They eat explicitly prohibited cattle, they vastly consume
>>> alcoholic beverages and they carelessly engage in illicit wedlock.
>>> Where is your devotional consignment? Religious life is the last
>>> thing a lay western Christian wants to think of. I respectfully ask
>>> you to ponder on your religious responsibility. As a Muslim, what
>>> prevents me from having a girlfriend? Well, nothing but my religion
>>> which holds me fully accountable for either righteous or vicious
>>> deeds. Why Christian tradition is so tolerant with the culture of
>>> boyfriend and girlfriend illicit relationships? As you can see,
>>> despite the concept’s fraudulently emotional prettification, it is
>>> besieged with numerously irreconcilable discrepancies. This is the
>>> primary tenet upon which your whole faith is based, this is indeed
>>> the backbone of Christianity. If someone disagrees with this
>>> statement, well, tell me then, how could the account of Crucifixion
>>> and Redemption be presented without basing it on the Christian
>>> concept of Original Sin? I seriously attempt to fathom. I do not
>>> intend to deride or ridicule. I am totally convinced that Christians
>>> have absolute right to broadly proselytize, to keenly call for their
>>> faith. Yes, they have the right to do so on one condition. I urge
>>> them to refrain from using fallacious rhetoric in their dialog. It
>>> just makes their stance quite attenuated and thus, susceptible to
>>> easily crumble under critical scrutiny. I am prepared to be
>>> christened if someone convinced me with plain reasonableness that
>>> what you believe is the truth. I do not give credit to Christian
>>> portraiture of original sin. Now, if you want to convince someone to
>>> become Christian, you have got to explain this mystery to him. For
>>> some reason, it seems to be unexplainable to me. It looks like as if
>>> someone worked it out or made it up. So basically, I feel it is
>>> quite perturbing to conjointly destine our whole human species to
>>> hell for no fault of its own. However, some pastors tend to baffle
>>> between holding the innocent versus the guilty accountable, either
>>> instigants or actual actors. Pastor Jacob of Michigan believes that
>>> instigants are not to be held accountable.
>>> Who is an instigant? An instigant is someone who
>>> deliberately foments trouble. So, if hateful pastors provoked mass
>>> Muslim offence that led to broad outrage, they are basically held
>>> accountable for any casualty or fatality rate. Similarly, if Muslim
>>> clerics caused hate because of their radical speech, they are wholly
>>> held accountable for any erupted tension in the community. So,
>>> statutorily, instigants are equally held accountable just as actual
>>> actors. So, if a girl who is absolutely gorgeous wore a staggeringly
>>> provocative outfit to purposely beguile men, she is partly held
>>> accountable for the lust she consciously instigated.
>>> It
>>> seems that fibbers and chisellers are not willing to address the
>>> subject of Original Sin fairly. They tend to breach with decisive facts.
>>> Therefore, their theology is incessantly subjected to critical criticism.
>>> Some of them even asked me, whether we as Muslims are sure we are
>>> going to heaven. I wouldn’t ever assure I am going to heaven unless
>>> with providential amnesty. I would say it is unjustified pride if I
>>> ever thought I am absolutely going to heaven. It just contradicts
>>> with enjoined humility. Islam teaches us to be pious and to devote
>>> ourselves to doing good deeds. I on multiple occasions attempted to
>>> establish a mutually deferential dialog with southern pastors.
>>> Nevertheless, they failed to comply to this. Their level of timidity
>>> did not match with my expectations.
>>> I tell them, if you ever wanted to learn about Islam, it is not an
>>> encouraging motive to obliviously quote oriental literature. First
>>> off, you desperately demand to develop proper command of Arabic.
>>> Moreover, your prejudicial notion doesn’t do more than
>>> substantiating your unprecedented nescience. If Original Sin wasn’t
>>> the fundamental belief of Christianity, it would have not been used
>>> to constitute its doctrinal tenets. I civilly postulate this
>>> theological conversation because I am quite interested in
>>> comparative theology. For each faith, there are fundamental tenets.
>>> I challengingly assert that without Original Sin, Christianity would
>>> have not ever existed. For emotional motives, the idea that someone
>>> died in the cause of your salvation is quite appealing. However, as
>>> we saw, it has many defects if it is to be illustrated in moderately
>>> rational disposal. I await to hear pastoral response. But please, we
>>> do not need to either equivocate nor unconscionably philosophise the
>>> matter. It rather has to be simplified in a rationally
>>> straightforward manner. Beating around the bush has intemperately
>>> fell at the first hurdle. Thank you for reading, Mostafa,
>>> technically Bob Evans.
>>>
>>> --
>>> This e-mail was sent from the "Contact US" page on Wake Up America
>>> Seminars
>>> (https://www.wake-up.org/contact-us/)
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BlParent mailing list
> BlParent at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blparent_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlParent:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blparent_nfbnet.org/thflute%40gmail.
> com
_______________________________________________
BlParent mailing list
BlParent at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blparent_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for BlParent:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blparent_nfbnet.org/advocate%40earthlink.net
More information about the BlParent
mailing list