[Ct-nfb] A Ridiculous Question
Cookiechumper at aol.com
Cookiechumper at aol.com
Sun Jan 5 03:38:11 UTC 2014
Justin, I am in agreeance with you both of this discrimination still
occurs.You are saying to amke calls nd write should do to all being senators
and local too. Thank you for putting this out for us all to see.
In a message dated 1/4/2014 7:20:2Elizabeth2 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
PRESIDENT at alumni.ecu.edu writes:
A Ridiculous Question
Submitted by alewis on Thu, 01/02/2014 - 11:32
Blog Date:
Thursday, January 2, 2014
By Anil Lewis
https://nfb.org/blog/vonb-blog/ridiculous-question
So you go to work tomorrow, and it is pay day. You receive a paycheck for
$15.00 for two weeks of work. You speak to your supervisor, and you are
informed that the company has switched to a new payroll model based on a new
law, Section D (9) (u), that calculates wages based on a new commensurate
wage formula. This new formula is only used to calculate the wages paid to
you and others like you. Although you are as productive as the other
employees, no one else but you and others like you are subjected to this new wage
formula, especially not management or the company executives. In fact, the
executives are now receiving six-figure salaries as a result of the cost
savings created by the new wage structure for workers like you. You complain,
to no avail. Managers attempt to convince you that this new structure still
offers you the ability to receive the tangible and intangible benefits of
work. After all, it is not about the money, it is about fulfillment.
This is not acceptable to you, so you seek vocational training that allows
you to be a more productive employee. You go to a section D(9)(u)
vocational training program that claims to be the best training program for people
like you. This community training program is operated in a sheltered,
segregated environment comprised of other people like you. The program assists
you in developing the work and interpersonal skills necessary to be a
competitive employee. They focus on teaching you real-world job skills like how
to fold letters, stuff envelopes, sort hangers, hang clothes, and screw caps
on pens. Although none of these tasks match your unique skills, talents,
abilities or interests, it is what the training program has to offer. If
there are no letters to be folded, envelopes to be stuffed, hangers to be
sorted, or pens to be capped, the program offers you the opportunity to play
video games, play cards, read books, or sleep.
The section D(9)(u) program costs more than other conventional training
programs, but it is subsidized with public funds and operates as a charitable
501(c)(3) organization. The program has a competitive employment placement
rate of less than 5 percent and therefore, most of the workers spend their
entire vocational existence in this “training” program. Even though the
program has no measureable positive impact on improving the employment of
people like you, the marketing team is successful in their efforts of
convincing public policy makers and philanthropic funding sources to feel that
this is the best employment strategy for people like you.
It is obvious that this new policy is denying you the opportunity to reach
your full vocational potential, while endorsing incompetent training
programs and substandard employers. You want this policy repealed and you want
the same workplace and wage protections as every other employee.
Okay, there is no Section D(9)(u) that exempts you from receiving equal
wage protections, but there is a Section 14(c ) of the Fair Labor Standards
Act (FLSA) that exempts people like me from being guaranteed the federal
minimum wage. So my question is, “Why is this type of discriminatory policy
not so ridiculous when it applies to people like me?”
For more information, visit http://www.nfb.org/fair-wages.
Mr. Anil Lewis, M.P.A.
Director of Advocacy and Policy
“Eliminating Subminimum Wages for People with Disabilities”
http://www.nfb.org/fairwages
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND
200 East Wells Street at Jernigan Place
Baltimore, Maryland 21230
(410) 659-9314 ext. 2374 (Voice)
(410) 685-5653 (FAX)
Email: _alewis at nfb.org_ (mailto:alewis at nfb.org)
Web: _www.nfb.org_ (http://www.nfb.org/)
twitter: @anillife
_______________________________________________
Ct-nfb mailing list
Ct-nfb at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/ct-nfb_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
Ct-nfb:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/ct-nfb_nfbnet.org/cookiechumper%40aol.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/ct-nfb_nfbnet.org/attachments/20140104/90e97085/attachment.html>
More information about the CT-NFB
mailing list