[Diabetes-talk] Prodigy Voice comments

Tue Jan 24 01:59:19 UTC 2012

Dolly Madison situation? I don't follow.

As for the Technology Bill of Rights, we (NFB) have pulled in our horns a
bit. Given the current make-up of the House of Representatives and the
adamant opposition of the majority party in the House to "mandates", it was
decided to reduce the scope of the Technology Bill of rights to cover only
home Appliances at this juncture. Thus, kiosks, office equipment and,
presumably, medical equipment, are not covered in the proposed Home
Appliance Accessibility Act. While this is disappointing to those of us who
use medical equipment that we wish were accessible without vision, this is
certainly understandable and, in the current political climate, wise. It's
far easier to explain to an obstinate congressperson why one might want
access to one's stove or laundry equipment than it is to cover a more
extensive list of products. Even so, we're rolling the stone uphill. I won't
write further in this vein as I might wax partisan and NFB is nonpartisan.
If you want to read a diatribe on the subject, write me privately. (huge
grin)

Insofar as what we can do, I'll give some advice privately. But publicly, I
think the best we can do re accessibility is to await the results of the
2012 elections and hope the next Congress will be mor conducive to mandates.

We can still work at the state level to make insurance carriers put what
accessible products there are on their formularies. I confess that I have
not caused a bill to be introduced in the Washington state legislature to
this effect though I know where in statute it should reside as the
legislature is dealing primarily with figuring out how to balance our
budjget and it's a short session so any bill I would have introduced would
go nowhere. I hope the legislative climate is better next year.

Mike Freeman

-----Original Message-----
From: diabetes-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org
[mailto:diabetes-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Bridgit Pollpeter
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 1:24 PM
To: 'Diabetes Talk for the Blind'
Subject: Re: [Diabetes-talk] Prodigy Voice comments

Just out of curiosity, what is being done, or has been done, helping
diabetics receive the nonvisual tools, such as talking meters, essential
for independent management, and is this something that would be covered
under the technology bill of rights? And are there any updates on this
bill? And if diabetic needs are not specifically mentioned in the
current bill, what can any of us do to ensure we are listed on it? Don't
want another Dolly Madison situation, smile.

Sincerely,
Bridgit Kuenning-Pollpeter
Read my blog at:
http://blogs.livewellnebraska.com/author/bpollpeter/

"History is not what happened; history is what was written down."
The Expected One- Kathleen McGowan

-----Original Message-----
From: diabetes-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org
[mailto:diabetes-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Colleen Roth
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 12:37 PM
To: diabetes-talk at nfbnet.org
Subject: Re: [Diabetes-talk] Prodigy Voice comments

Hi,
My Prescription Provider only covers strips and lancets from two
companies. It is amazing but Expess Scrips can't figure out why a
totally blind person needs to have a talking meter. Colleen Roth

----- Original Message -----
From: Albert Sanchez <albertsanchez at suddenlink.net>
To: "Diabetes Talk for the Blind" <diabetes-talk at nfbnet.org>
Date: Monday, Jan 23, 2012 09:22:53 AM
Subject: [Diabetes-talk] Prodigy Voice comments

>
>
> Hello List
> I have been using a Prodigy Voice glucometer for the last several 
> years and
> am quite pleased with it. I recently had a need to find the meters
serial 
> number which is on the back. Since both my wife and I are totally
blind I 
> had to wait until I could get sighted assistance in finding that
number and 
> it occurred to me that since I can get an audible "readout" of the
serial 
> number from my Digital Talking Book player and my VR Stream, would it
be 
> possible to get that type of information built in to the "Voice"? I
called 
> Prodigy Tech Support with that idea. I was told by their
representative that 
> "if it happened at all, it would be a long time before it would be 
> implemented. The reason for the importance of the Serial Number is
that some 
> software to download your readings from the meter to the computer
requires 
> the meters serial number.
> 
> Am I the only one who wonders about this, or are their others on list 
> with
> input into this discussion question.
> 
> Yours Cordially
> Albert Sanchez
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Diabetes-talk mailing list
> Diabetes-talk at nfbnet.org 
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/diabetes-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> Diabetes-talk: 
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/diabetes-talk_nfbnet.org/n8tnv%40att
> .net

_______________________________________________
Diabetes-talk mailing list
Diabetes-talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/diabetes-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
Diabetes-talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/diabetes-talk_nfbnet.org/bpollpeter%40
hotmail.com

_______________________________________________
Diabetes-talk mailing list
Diabetes-talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/diabetes-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
Diabetes-talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/diabetes-talk_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40panix.com