[Diabetes-talk] Diabetes resolution
Mike Freeman
k7uij at panix.com
Wed Nov 20 21:30:03 UTC 2013
Sandi:
Please reread my post. I cited Apple because I was trying to illustrate a
problem we'll have with FDA approving access technology. Please put your
antennae down a bit looking for bogey-men that aren't there.
I used the iPhone as an example because the FDA actually had outlined what
its policy would be re iPhone diabetes applications, not because I presumed
technology would be restricted to i-devices.
Voice technology isn't always quite as simple as even much of our leadership
would like to make it, i.e., there's more to it than most people (including
many of our leaders) presume.
But this is really not the proper venue, I believe, to discuss the
technicalities or engineering of a particular solution. All I'm saying is
don't be surprised if things end up more complex than you might imagine.
Again, this is no reason not to consider certain solutions.
Put another way: don't shoot the messenger.He is not trying to impede our
progress.
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Diabetes-talk [mailto:diabetes-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of
Sandi Ryan
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:38 AM
To: Diabetes Talk for the Blind
Subject: Re: [Diabetes-talk] Diabetes resolution
Who said anything about forcing people to work with iPhone technology? What
I said was, Apple created a model for selling the technology that better
spread the cost of accessibility across the whole population, rather than
limiting it to a small, special population. Perhaps we can help others make
that model work, too. I, for one, have not minded going to the store,
buying the same thing everyone else buys, and having it automatically work
for me, without having to spend an arm and a leg on speech for it, etc.
I am not promoting Apple's technology in any way! Please read what's said
very carefully.
Sandi
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernadette Jacobs" <bernienfb75 at gmail.com>
To: "Diabetes Talk for the Blind" <diabetes-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Diabetes-talk] Diabetes resolution
> Hey Gang:
>
> Bern here. I have to say, I'm with Veronica and mike on this one.
> Furthermore, if I were to have a pump, and my next talking meter, got
> forbid that I should have to buy an Iphone too just so I can not only work
> the technology, but survive too??? So, how stupid is that???
>
> Bern
> On 11/19/2013 8:30 PM, Sandi Ryan wrote:
>>
>> And I don't think Apple created Voiceover and made their products
>> accessible just because they're good that way. I think that the small
>> population of blind people, working together and with partners, created
>> an atmosphere that demanded what we needed, and even this giant
>> corporation saw the light. And they created a model for
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Diabetes-talk mailing list
> Diabetes-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/diabetes-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Diabetes-talk:
>
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/diabetes-talk_nfbnet.org/sjryan2%40gmail.c
om
>
_______________________________________________
Diabetes-talk mailing list
Diabetes-talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/diabetes-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
Diabetes-talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/diabetes-talk_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40panix.com
More information about the Diabetes-Talk
mailing list