[DSM-Iowa] Fwd: resolution

[shawnmmayo at gmail.com]

Hi Terri,

 

Sorry that I was not more clear, but I do not think that what I sent back to you  is the final version. I guess I should have stated that specifically. You had asked for my input and I made some revisions, but said that I did not know where to go for certain after that point. I thought since you had been talking with others about this that you may have some of that info or would researched it    and incorporated it into more whereas and resolves.  Since you sent this out with no changes or comments, I wanted to make sure you know  that I do not think this is a final version and that it needs more work. I do think the second version you had sent was better than the first version though. You incorporated comments I had made and so I thought you were going to do that with this last version too. If you want    to work on some of the points I raised, you can make those changes and I can offer any feedback if I get a chance. I   do have several things going on this coming week though, so my time is limited.

 

Thanks,

Shawn

 

 

From: DSM-Iowa <dsm-iowa-bounces at nfbnet.org> On Behalf Of Terri Wilcox via DSM-Iowa
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2024 7:17 PM
To: Cindy Ray <dsm-iowa at nfbnet.org>
Cc: Terri Wilcox <trising1943 at gmail.com>
Subject: [DSM-Iowa] Fwd: resolution

 

 

Sent from my iPhone


Begin forwarded message:

From: shawnmmayo at gmail.com <mailto:shawnmmayo at gmail.com> 
Date: October 7, 2024 at 11:44:44 AM CDT
To: Terri Wilcox <trising1943 at gmail.com <mailto:trising1943 at gmail.com> >, Helen Mejia <hmmejia22 at gmail.com <mailto:hmmejia22 at gmail.com> >
Subject: resolution



Hi Terri,

Attached please find your  volunteer resolution. You made some good changes. I have  edited the first several whereas statements for your consideration. However I stopped at the whereas that talks about the policy being passed because when I read the policy I did not see exactly how the NFBI wants to address this exactly; more specifically I do not know exactly what IL is doing and have not seen any of the correspondence with the business classes. Also, is the resolve to then remove the former employee termination section or is there a different way of addressing it. I do not like the terminated employee restriction either, but what would be the justification the NFBI wants to use?  I know to some extent what we want but I am unsure exactly how to word it.

 

Best,

Shawn

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/dsm-iowa_nfbnet.org/attachments/20241010/0127968c/attachment.htm>