[Electronics-talk] Mac, etc.

[Jorge Paez]

Christopher:
I agree.
However, HR4533, and other legal documents do consider computers as "consumer electronic devices." So while we can't go on and on about one device, short threads like this, I think, are fine.

Jorge



Thanks.



Jorge Paez


---
President And CEO:
Paez Production Networks





Please note:
this message may contain confidential and/or classified information.
Such information is only revealed to the person to whom this communication is directed to.
If you have received this message in error, please type "error" in the subject line for the reply message and destroy any and all copies of this message and/or any accompanying media.

On Aug 21, 2010, at 12:32 PM, Christopher Chaltain wrote:

> According to the list's web page, ....
> 
> "This list is intended for the sharing of information about, and discussion of the accessibility of various consumer electronics devices. Sharing of information
> about, and discussion of MP3 players; cell phones and other telephones; DVD players, receivers and other stereo and video components; satellite and HD
> radios; and household appliances including microwaves, washers, dryers, stoves, and the like; is appropriate and encouraged. With more and more devices
> having inaccessible controls or displays, a place to share information and experiences is needed. It is also hoped that this list will divert such discussions
> from other NFB-sponsored lists, where it is not appropriate."
> 
> "This list will also on occasion carry announcements and/or information of importance to the NFB and its members and friends as a whole."
> 
> I guess it's up for interpretation, but I don't consider a PC to be "a consumer electronics device", and I'm OK with David--the moderator--making that call. I joined this list to hear about accessible consumer electronics, and I'll join other lists to talk about PC's.
> 
> Since David's post isn't included in the thread below, and I didn't bother to keep it, I can't speak to whether it could have been more polite with more please's and thank you's, but I don't recall seeing anything from David that was particularly rude. In general, I find David can be a it terse and to the point at times, but he almost always directs people to other sources of information when they're straying off topic. I also don't think he clamps down on off topic posts too quickly, which is good for a general purpose list like this. In conclusion, I've seen much worse moderators who were either too heavy handed or went to the other extreme and let the list deteriorate into off topic threads and flame wars.
> 
> I Do wonder what a list moderator can do to moderate the list without opening themselves up and the rest of the list to this debate and discussion every time they step in as the list moderator though. For my part, I'm happy letting David moderate his own list.
> 
> If this list is less cordial than other lists, I don't think it's the fault of the moderator. A moderator can only do so much to enforce civility on a list. I don't think we have anyone to blame but ourselves.
> 
> --
> 
> Christopher
> chaltain at gmail.com
> 
> 
> On 8/21/2010 7:53 AM, Steve P. Deeley wrote:
>> Are you saying that a computer is not an electronic device??  That is ridiculous.
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Craig Werner" <craig_werner at verizon.net>
>> To: "Discussion of accessible electronics and appliances" <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 8:46 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Electronics-talk] Mac, etc.
>> 
>> 
>>> Twenty-four years of online experience teaches me that sending "I agree"
>>> messages are poor etiquette, but I'm going to post one anyway.
>>> 
>>> I agree with Peter:  I suggest that an occasional foray into discussion
>>> of computers is not uncalled for.  If this were a high-volume list, and
>>> if such messages proliferated, then I would probably change my mind.
>>> However, as matters with this list stand now, I fail to see the harm or
>>> inconvenience caused by well-meaning posts such as those Ray has sent
>>> out about the Mac.  In fact, they are potentially instructive and helpfull.
>>> 
>>> Craig
>>> 
>>> On 8/21/2010 5:31 AM, Peter Rabaioli wrote:
>>>> With notable exceptions, there is a lack of cordiality in general by the
>>>> participants on this list.  Ray was kind enough to answer a couple of
>>>> questions about using a Mac as a happy user of such a device, which, to me
>>>> is an electronic device.  Perhaps keeping bafoons such as  Dewey's rants off
>>>> the air, would be more in line in the role  of the list moderator, than
>>>> deciding weather, or not a computer is a part of tech gear. Thank you for
>>>> the suggestion for looking at another list for computer use.    I've seen
>>>> much more  off topic items listed here.   A few more please and thank you's
>>>> would lift the general level of communication here.  Just my humble opinion.
>>>> All the best, and, thanks again to Ray.  Best, Peter 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-talk mailing list
> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Electronics-talk:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/jorgeapaez%40mac.com