[Electronics-talk] Color Identification Technology

Sun Dec 20 23:14:29 UTC 2015

My mother had these disks she got that looked like the inside was cut in 
quarters, and the very outside was not cut.  You were supposed to pull the 
socks through the slots to keep them together.  I never used them, because I 
didn't know how that would not destroy the threads.  Pam.

-----Original Message----- 
From: cheez via Electronics-talk
Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 12:49 AM
To: Discussion of accessible electronics and appliances
Cc: cheez
Subject: Re: [Electronics-talk] Color Identification Technology

I use sock tuckers for my socks.  I used to use safety pins to keep the
colors together, but the pins started tearing the socks after a while.  The
sock tuckers can be bought at Maxiaid.

For my plain white shirts, I cut a slit in the tag for identification.
Fortunately, all of my white shirts have tags.  I know most shirts don't
have tags these days.  However, if I do happen to get tagless shirts, I will
sew a small bump of thread in an in conspicuous place.

Vince

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tracy Carcione via Electronics-talk" <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
To: "'Discussion of accessible electronics and appliances'"
<electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
Cc: "Tracy Carcione" <carcione at access.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2015 7:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Electronics-talk] Color Identification Technology

> Hi Ben.
> That sounds like a good solution, though a safety pin seems simpler to me.
> They're fine in the wash, in my experience. I believe I've seen a kind of
> safety pin meant especially to go through the laundry, too, maybe at
> BlindMiceMart.
> I guess I don't have so many labelled clothes to put in the wash at one 
> time
> that I can't keep track of which goes where.  I look at the label and the
> garment, then toss it in the wash, and put it back with its label when 
> it's
> clean.  The only exception would be plain, colored T-shirts that look the
> same except for the color, but my color detector does OK with plain 
> colors,
> so I could use it to re-identify them.
> Tracy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Electronics-talk [mailto:electronics-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> Behalf Of Benjamin Vercellone via Electronics-talk
> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 10:13 AM
> To: Discussion of accessible electronics and appliances
> Cc: Benjamin Vercellone
> Subject: Re: [Electronics-talk] Color Identification Technology
>
> Hello Tracy.
> Thank you for your advice. I especially like the method you described that
> involves Braille, twist ties, etc. My only question was how you keep track
> of your clothing when it is in the washer and dryer? How do you know that
> you're putting each garment back on the correct hanger or pairing it with
> the right label if you don't hang a particular garment? I had one idea 
> after
> I read your message. I was thinking that I could write my own short code 
> at
> the end of the Braille description. The code could be anything I come up
> with. Maybe I would start with K1, for example. I would write this at the
> end of the Braille description. The next garment, according to this 
> system,
> would have K2 at the end. Anyway, I could take a 3 by 5 inch plastic card
> which I got from the NFB Independence Market. I could cut it into strips,
> write the same codes on the strips, punch a whole in one end of each 
> strip,
> and find a way to attach the strips to the garment just for the duration 
> of
> the washer and d  ryer cycles. I was thinking I could use a binding clip 
> or
> something to attach each strip to any point on the garment. This 
> connection
> point would probably be the tag in most cases. I would undo one side of 
> the
> binding clip, put this wire part through the personal Braille tag as well 
> as
> the tag of the garment, reattach the whire part to it's intended position 
> in
> the binding clip, and then throw the garment in the laundry.
> These are my thoughts at this point. Please let me know what you think.
> Ben
>
>
>
>> On Dec 18, 2015, at 7:49 AM, Tracy Carcione via Electronics-talk
> <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ben.
>> I have the Cobol color identifier, and it does OK.  I hear the
>> Colorino does OK, too.  My Cobol works better than the Color ID app on
>> my iPhone, which seems to require optimal light conditions for even
> adequate results.
>> The trouble with any of these solutions, IMO, is that they don't tell
>> me anything about the pattern.  I have several multi-color skirts, and
>> several tops with stripes, checks, or other patterns, and I need to know
> that.
>> Therefore, the best solution for clothes I have figured out is to rope
>> in some sighted person whose color sense I trust, and get her to
>> describe the item in question.  Then I write a braille label on a
>> piece of braille paper (thick plastic would also work), punch a hole
>> in the top of the label, attach a twist-tie, and attach the other end
>> of the twist-tie to the hanger for the piece of clothing.  If it
>> doesn't go on a hanger, I fold the label in with the clothing, or pin
>> it on with a safety pin.  It takes more initial investment than
>> zapping something with a color identifier, but, once it's done, it's done
> for years, and is very accurate.
>> For example, I could write "blue, purple, brown leaf pattern", or
>> "blue and white stripes".
>>
>> It would be possible to do something similar with something like the
>> Pen Friend--create a recorded label with all the info needed and
>> attach it to the clothing.
>> HTH.
>> Tracy
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Electronics-talk [mailto:electronics-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>> Behalf Of Benjamin Vercellone via Electronics-talk
>> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 6:14 AM
>> To: electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
>> Cc: Benjamin Vercellone
>> Subject: [Electronics-talk] Color Identification Technology
>>
>>> Hello.
>>> I have some questions regarding color identification technology. This
>> could include dedicated devices, smart phone apps, etc.
>>> I would like to know if anyone on this list has used a color
>>> identifier
>> and found it to be consistently helpful. I have used several hardware
>> solutions up to this point, and have encountered considerable difficulty.
>> With each color identification tool I have owned over the years (maybe
>> 2 or 3), I have asked sighted family members or friends to tell me if
>> they agree or disagree with the answer given by the technology. The
>> problem in my experience is that a large percentage of the time, the
>> sighted people disagree with the answer given by the technology. I
>> have had people tell me all kinds of things, like how everyone
>> interprets colors differently. Some people have told me that the human
>> brain doesn't see the actual color anyway. I don't know if this is
>> true, but I honestly don't care very much personally. I simply want to
>> coordinate my clothing largely according to color, and to do this as
>> effectively, independently, and spontaneously as possible. I desire to
>> use technology to this end if possible. I therefore care how people
>> interpret the colors of my clothing. I want to have technology that
>> agrees with the color analysis of sighted people most of the time. If
>> it's not perfect, that's fine. But the technology I have tried has
>> given results different from the human answers a huge percentage of
>> the time. Even if this has been less than half of the time, it still
>> concerns me a lot. Furthermore, most sighted people from whom I gather
>> color information give answers that are mostly the same. Most people
>> say a garment is a certain color, and if there has been an outlier in
>> terms of the answer, it is usually on the part of the technology I have
> tried.
>>> Has anyone else experienced this? Also, if anyone has bought a more
>> expensive color identifier, I am wondering if this has increased
>> accuracy. I am open to suggessions as well as questions.
>>> I have also tried using some apps on my iPhone. I have definitely had
>>> the
>> most success, though still spotty, with Tap Tap See. I am confident
>> that others have tried this kind of approach as well. I like Tap Tap
>> see more than other solutions I have tried thus far for a couple
>> reasons. Most of all, I am pleased that there are humans available on
>> the other end. This allows me to get an answer that I feel I can trust
>> somewhat more. Also, when this method works its best, I am often told
>> the pattern of my garment as well, such as plaid. I am totally blind,
>> by the way. I know that many blind people have used various types of
>> low-tech labeling solutions with clothing, such as metallic braille
>> tags, various shapes, etc. I am open to using these methods as well.
>> However, I want to gather information and perspectives from other blind
> people who have used color identification technology.
>>> To summarize my opinions, I believe that color identification
>>> technology
>> is one of the least reliable technologies I have used for independence
>> up to this point. If others have had much better experiences, I would
>> love to hear more, and be proven wrong. However, I can say for certain
>> that in my experience, I have not had enough success with color
>> identification technology to confidently coordinate my clothing by
>> this means alone. Also, I went completely blind at age 4, and only
>> know about 10 to 15 colors accurately in my head. In other words, I do
>> not desire a color identifier that boasts more than 600 colors or
>> whatever. I am able to understand light, medium, and dark for many
>> colors. Also, if there is a color that I did not have in my vocabulary
>> as a small child, I will need someone to describe it in relation to
>> the basic colors. This helps me a fare amount. Still, I prefer simpler
>> answers over sophisticated ones. Finally, can anyone give advice
>> regarding how to find opti mal lighting for apps like Tap Tap See? Any 
>> and
> all advice is appreciated!
>>> Thank you,
>>> Ben
>> _______________________________________________
>> Electronics-talk mailing list
>> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> Electronics-talk:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/carcione
>> %40acc
>> ess.net
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Electronics-talk mailing list
>> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Electronics-talk:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/ben.verc
>> ellone%40icloud.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-talk mailing list
> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Electronics-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/carcione%40acc
> ess.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-talk mailing list
> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> Electronics-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/cheez%40cox.net

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
protection is active.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
Electronics-talk mailing list
Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
Electronics-talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/geodom%40optonline.net

-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.6176 / Virus Database: 4489/11215 - Release Date: 12/19/15 