[Electronics-talk] Traffic signal app

Mike Sedmak mcsedmak at gmail.com
Sun Jun 28 00:03:32 UTC 2015 

That is certainly not the practice across the entire state of Colorado. In Fort Collins I work directly with the traffic department to get intersections switch to audible signal.

Thanks,
Mike

Sent from my iPhone, please forgive the typos. 

> On Jun 27, 2015, at 3:16 PM, Brett Boyer via Electronics-talk <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org> wrote:
> 
> Yes this is true. I have a partially deaf friend who is a total. He cannot
> just "use parallel traffic" like every blindy know-it-all has told him. When
> he contacted the city about getting an audible traffic light for a busy
> street near his house, he was told that the city could not approve that
> until The Colorado Center for the Blind was contacted and asked if it was
> okay. I've never seen such control from the NFB. And to be honest, I didn't
> like it! 
> Rhetorical question: Who gives them the right?
> bb
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Electronics-talk [mailto:electronics-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> Behalf Of Gerald Levy via Electronics-talk
> Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 11:34 AM
> To: Discussion of accessible electronics and appliances
> Cc: Gerald Levy
> Subject: Re: [Electronics-talk] Traffic signal app
> 
> 
> And suppose, like me, you are also severely hearing impaired and cannot
> accurately determine traffic flow patterns by sound, even with high-tech
> digital hearing aids?  At least audible traffic signals provide another
> piece of information that makes crossing a busy intersection a little safer.
> 
> It amazes me that there are actually blindness advocacy organizations that
> oppose such audible signals and have fought hard to prevent them from being
> installed.  Unbelievable.
> 
> Gerald
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Barbour via Electronics-talk" <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
> To: "Discussion of accessible electronics and appliances" 
> <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
> Cc: "Jim Barbour" <jbar at barcore.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 2:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [Electronics-talk] Traffic signal app
> 
> 
>> The real question is what do you need an audible traffic signal or an 
>> iPhone app for? I generally cross intersections by relying on traffic 
>> patterns, not on something to tell me the color of the light.
>> 
>> Just my thought,
>> 
>> Jim
>> 
>> Written While on the Move
>> 
>>> On Jun 27, 2015, at 10:17 AM, Mike Freeman via Electronics-talk 
>>> <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I guess my problem is that I don't see how *simple* vibration patterns 
>>> could
>>> convey enough information about complex intersections and if it were a
>>> simple go-no-go, you'd be trusting the app and/or the traffic signal to 
>>> make
>>> judgment calls for you. I guess I don't trust either the iPhone or the
>>> traffic signal to get it right.
>>> 
>>> I know what I shall say next is impractical. But I'd prefer a little 
>>> remote
>>> that, when punched, would do the same thing emergency vehicles can do, 
>>> that
>>> is, automagically turn lights green in the direction you're going. Ah, 
>>> what
>>> fun!
>>> 
>>> Mike
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Electronics-talk [mailto:electronics-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Elizabeth Campbell via Electronics-talk
>>> Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 9:27 AM
>>> To: 'Discussion of accessible electronics and appliances'
>>> Cc: Elizabeth Campbell
>>> Subject: Re: [Electronics-talk] Traffic signal app
>>> 
>>> Hi Mike,
>>> I do think the smart phone app is worth considering as I don't see why 
>>> you
>>> would need ear buds when a developer could incorporate vibration patterns
> 
>>> to
>>> indicate the status of the traffic signal.And of course, we have to rely 
>>> on
>>> our own hearing and judgment first and foremost when crossing streets.
>>> I see this app as a tool to supplement our travel, in the same way that 
>>> some
>>> use Blind Square or other GPS apps.
>>> 
>>> JMO
>>> 
>>> Liz
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Electronics-talk [mailto:electronics-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>>> Behalf Of cheez via Electronics-talk
>>> Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 11:10 AM
>>> To: Discussion of accessible electronics and appliances
>>> Cc: cheez
>>> Subject: Re: [Electronics-talk] Traffic signal app
>>> 
>>> So, I guess Phoenix isn't the only city with the audible signals that 
>>> sound
>>> like a machine gun.  When I asked a person from The City why the change 
>>> was
>>> made, he said a group of engineers decided that sound was better than a
>>> chirp or beep.  I told him I'd bet anything not one of them were blind 
>>> nor
>>> cross intersections.  I also pointed out that those with hearing deficits
>>> may not be able to hear the new sound.
>>> 
>>> Mike, I get what you're saying about the delay of a traffic light's
>>> information.  But perhaps the app could be launched before you leave, and
>>> then run in the background.
>>> 
>>> As far as headphones are concerned, we may see future devices coming out
>>> with the bone-conducting headphones included.
>>> 
>>> Vince
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Mike Freeman via Electronics-talk" <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
>>> To: "'Discussion of accessible electronics and appliances'"
>>> <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>
>>> Cc: "Mike Freeman" <k7uij at panix.com>
>>> Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 8:18 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Electronics-talk] Traffic signal app
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Hi, Elizabeth.
>>>> 
>>>> With respect, I beg to differ with you. By the time an app told you what
>>>> you
>>>> needed to know, the light would have changed. Moreover, you'd need 
>>>> earbuds
>>>> or those bone-conducting headphones to hear your i-device anyway. And I
>>>> wouldn't want to be fiddling with an app at a street crossing when, in 
>>>> the
>>>> end, like everyone else, I'm dependent upon my senses and my brain to 
>>>> mind
>>>> its P's and Q's.
>>>> 
>>>> Also, such an app and the underlying infrastructure would be way too 
>>>> easy
>>>> to
>>>> hack -- not a comforting thought when my posterior is on the line.
>>>> 
>>>> Mike Freeman
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Electronics-talk [mailto:electronics-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>>>> Behalf Of Elizabeth Campbell via Electronics-talk
>>>> Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 8:12 AM
>>>> To: 'Discussion of accessible electronics and appliances'
>>>> Cc: Elizabeth Campbell
>>>> Subject: Re: [Electronics-talk] Traffic signal app
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Tracy,
>>>> 
>>>> I agree that having such an app would be extremely helpful. I really 
>>>> don't
>>>> like the audible signals that are currently in use, but I think a smart
>>>> phone app is a great idea.
>>>> It would also benefit us since cars are much quieter now. Also, we have 
>>>> to
>>>> contend with annoying, turning traffic.
>>>> 
>>>> Best
>>>> 
>>>> Liz
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Electronics-talk [mailto:electronics-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>>>> Behalf Of Tracy Carcione via Electronics-talk
>>>> Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 10:00 AM
>>>> To: 'Discussion of accessible electronics and appliances'
>>>> Cc: Tracy Carcione
>>>> Subject: [Electronics-talk] Traffic signal app
>>>> 
>>>> Someone said they'd heard about work on an app to identify when a 
>>>> traffic
>>>> light was walk or don't walk.  Anyone know any more about this?  I keep
>>>> thinking how useful that would be.  As I'm getting older, I don't hear 
>>>> the
>>>> traffic changes as well as I used to.  And an app seems a lot cheaper 
>>>> than
>>>> putting in audible signals.  And I keep hearing about traffic signals
>>>> having
>>>> all kinds of "smart" things built in, so maybe an app could build on
>>>> something already there.
>>>> 
>>>> Tracy
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Electronics-talk mailing list
>>>> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>> Electronics-talk:
>>>> 
>>> 
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/batescampbell%
>>>> 40gmail.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Electronics-talk mailing list
>>>> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>> Electronics-talk:
>>>> 
>>> 
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40panix.
>>>> com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Electronics-talk mailing list
>>>> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>> Electronics-talk:
>>>> 
>>> 
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/cheez%40cox.ne
>>> t
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
>>> protection is active.
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Electronics-talk mailing list
>>> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>> Electronics-talk:
>>> 
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/batescampbell%
>>> 40gmail.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Electronics-talk mailing list
>>> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>> Electronics-talk:
>>> 
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40panix.
>>> com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Electronics-talk mailing list
>>> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
>>> Electronics-talk:
>>> 
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/jbar%40barcore
> .com
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Electronics-talk mailing list
>> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
>> Electronics-talk:
>> 
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/bwaylimited%40
> verizon.net 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-talk mailing list
> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Electronics-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/bboyer202%40gm
> ail.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Electronics-talk mailing list
> Electronics-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Electronics-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/electronics-talk_nfbnet.org/mcsedmak%40gmail.com

More information about the Electronics-Talk mailing list