[Faith-talk] The Bible and the Law.

[Mostafa Almahdy via Faith-talk]

Hey folks, just a quick note to mention.

I was recently debating a Pastor over the laws of the Pentateuch and
how juristically they pertain to the contemporary practices of
Christianity, and in the west in particular.

In the New testament writings, and in Matthew five seventeen to be
further precise, Jesus explicitly states that he did not come to
abolish the law nor the prophets, but to rather fulfill them.

In Christian tradition of the west today, we see many Christians
plainly  discrediting or abrogating   the dietary adherence, they
claim it belongs to the Jews, and they do not eat Kosher, they eat
pork, some of them notoriously drink, and they even deal with usury.

Are the dietary  laws religiously obselete according to the scriptural
parameters?

Christians today based largely on their pastoral advocacy  at the
Church are predominantly influenced by what they mostly derive and
interpret to them.

Does the Bible explicitly prohibit the swine?

I am aware of multiple Coptics here in Egypt who would never even
approach the pork.

They also refrain from all intoxicants here.

So if the Bible forbids the swine, intoxications, and usury, why we do
not find that complied to in dominantly western Christian
denominations?

I find them here more dietary  observers than what they are in the
western world.

Is there any specific reasons for that?

Could that be due to cultural influence?

I am not trying to based my own comprehension as the licit conclusion.

I am just attempting to fathom the substantial phenomenon.

I apologize for being uncomplimentary.

I  see Christians  vastly diverse in their theological creeds, let
alone what they practice, so I am trying to find a valid justification
for that.

Thanks and best regards.








On 5/27/14, Mostafa Almahdy <mostafa.almahdy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks to both of you, Rob and Debby.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 5/27/14, Rob Kaiser <rcubfank at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> Good point.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: debby phillips via Faith-talk
>> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2014 7:41 PM
>> To: Mostafa ; Faith-talk,for the discussion of faith and religion ;
>> faith-talk at nfbnet.org
>> Subject: Re: [Faith-talk] Perennial Rampage.
>>
>> Hello! Wow, I am very much in agreement with much of what you
>> have written here.  The problem here is that there are people in
>> our country who are totally opposed to any kind of gun control at
>> all.  They anger me because although there are other ways of
>> killing people like stabbing and such, semi-automatic guns are
>> not necessary for people to have.  Why does someone need an
>> AK-47? Or an Uzi, or whatever.  Ah, but I shouldn't get started
>> with this.  I am sure that there will be people here who have
>> different opinions, and this list probably isn't the best vehicle
>> for this discussion.  But we can pray for those who have lost
>> loved ones in Santa Barbara, and also in South Carolina (there
>> was a shooting there as well).    Blessings,    Debby
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Faith-talk mailing list
>> Faith-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/faith-talk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> Faith-talk:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/faith-talk_nfbnet.org/rcubfank%40sbcglobal.net
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> (Seeking knowledge is compulsory from cratle to grave because it is a
> shoreless ocean.)
>


-- 
(Seeking knowledge is compulsory from cratle to grave because it is a
shoreless ocean.)