[humanser] A question for the group

Michael Bullis mabullis at hotmail.com
Sun Feb 22 16:51:32 UTC 2009


I've been called to serve six or seven times over my lifetime.  Served once
on a case and had a ball.  
Mike Bullis 

-----Original Message-----
From: humanser-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:humanser-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
Behalf Of David R. Stayer
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 10:56 AM
To: Human Services Mailing List
Subject: Re: [humanser] A question for the group

Shalom. Ai have not served and was praised when I indicated that I did not
want to be exceusec based on blindness.  I was not selecged for one case
since a sighted person fell getting on a bus and I indicated that I have not
fallen.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Melissa Ann Riccobono" <melissa at riccobono.us>
To: "'Human Services Mailing List'" <humanser at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [humanser] A question for the group


> It's an interesting question.  I have not served myself.  I was 
> summoned last year and went to the court house.  Right away someone 
> tried to excuse me, but I said very forcefully that I did not want to 
> be excused and they let me stay.  I was called in as a potential 
> jurrer in two cases.  The first they did not pick me.  The second I 
> asked to be excused because it was going to be an extremely lengthy 
> trial and I had a small child at home who I was the primary caregiver 
> for during the day.  The judge let me go, but I hope this had more to 
> do with my family situation than my blindness.  Perhaps it was a bit 
> of both...  Hard to say.
> I do have two blind friends who have served without at problem.
> Melissa
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: humanser-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:humanser-bounces at nfbnet.org] 
> On Behalf Of Jeffrey Schwartz
> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 6:29 PM
> To: 'Human Services Mailing List'
> Subject: Re: [humanser] A question for the group
>
> I've been wondering about this for some time.  I would like to serve 
> on a jury.  The one time I was summoned, much to my regret, I asked my 
> ophthalmologist to write a letter stating that I am blind and should 
> be excused.  I am wondering if it is considered illegal to ban us.  I 
> can see why they would want to do this and I would not be offended.  
> There can be visual evidence , a substantial amount in some cases.  We 
> could ask for an interpreter or such as the blind do, but this would 
> be awkward and not precise.  The attorneys each have a number of 
> peremptory challenges.  This allows them to dismiss someone without 
> giving a reason.  I suspect that one or the other would drop us in 
> this way.  Any experiences with this?  Any of you served?  What do you 
> think about the issue?
> Jeff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: humanser-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:humanser-bounces at nfbnet.org] 
> On Behalf Of Marion & Martin
> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 3:12 PM
> To: Human Services Mailing List
> Subject: A question for the group
>
> Shannon,
>    I will refer back to my earlier message regarding whether or not 
> schools
>
> require O&M instruction before being accepted for training. As to your 
> other
>
> question about substituting one O&M instruction for another, perhaps 
> an analogy from our mutual experience will help.
>    I notice you have an MSW. I have an MS in Mental Health Counseling. 
> In my undergraduate program I took a Research Methods class. I also 
> took a Research Methods class in graduate school. now, I could have 
> argued with the
>
> school that I had already had Research Methods and didn't need to take 
> it again. Of course, my arguments would not have been accepted as the 
> requirement to take their class is part of their program. Furthermore, 
> the level, scope, and complexity of the class was very different in 
> graduate school than it was in undergraduate classes. Can you 
> understand how this applies to this issue?
>
> Fraternally,
> Marion
>
> We are both
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shannon Cook" <SCook at sccb.sc.gov>
> To: "'Human Services Mailing List'" <humanser at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 9:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [humanser] Jury finds IA Dept. for Blind's guide dog 
> policy does not discriminate
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Isn't it true though, that in order to get a guide dog, an individual 
>> has to have good mobility skills with a cane and have their 
>> application signed
>
>> by an O & M instructor?  If they have already gone through the 
>> mobility portion of training and received a guide dog, why then would 
>> it be necessary to go back to an unchosen method of travel?  Why not 
>> just have them not take that particular class?
>>
>> That is my 2 cents.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Shannon Cook, MSW
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: humanser-bounces at nfbnet.org 
>> [mailto:humanser-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Doug Lee
>> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 11:20 PM
>> To: Human Services Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [humanser] Jury finds IA Dept. for Blind's guide dog 
>> policy does not discriminate
>>
>> That one could start quite a discussion of course... but from the 
>> perspective of the case, these are not even the relevant questions.
>> The training center teaches classes, and one of those is a travel 
>> class, and the travel class teaches cane skills, not dog skills.  
>> Just as you don't go to a driving class to learn how to fly an 
>> airplane, you don't go to a cane school to learn guide dog use.  The 
>> school has the right to choose what skills to teach, and the student 
>> has the right to take what the school has to offer and the right not 
>> to.  Of course, the student also has the right to visit the school 
>> with cane or dog at any time visitation is possible I'm sure. :)
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:27:10PM -0600, James Brown wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> Can you share some knowledge with someone who has always been a cane 
>>> user?
>>>
>>> Setting aside all the legalities, what does everyone think about 
>>> this case? Any die hard cane users out there?  How about you guide 
>>> dog lovers, what do you think?
>>>
>>> Is there a significant difference between using a cane or dog?  Is 
>>> either one really that perfect?
>>>
>>> Are we trying to shape other blind people into our own image, all 
>>> the while damaging the individuality of the blind population?
>>>
>>> whether it's a stick or a dog, aren't we all depending on something?
>>>
>>> Is this a kind of twisted psychology, or is it more about being 
>>> practical?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> JB
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wilson,Joanne (by way of David 
>>> Andrews <dandrews at visi.com>)" <JWilson at nfb.org>
>>> To: <david.andrews at nfbnet.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 4:24 PM
>>> Subject: [humanser] Jury finds IA Dept. for Blind's guide dog policy 
>>> does not discriminate
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------
>>> From: Brammer, Robert [AG] [mailto:rbrammer at ag.state.ia.us]
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 1:53 PM
>>> To: Brammer, Robert [AG]
>>> Subject: Atty. Gen. release: Jury finds IA Dept.
>>> for Blind's guide dog policy does not discriminate
>>>
>>> To News Editors.   From Bob Brammer (Iowa
>>> Attorney General's Office - 515-281-6699.) Please find a release 
>>> pasted below.  This will be posted soon at 
>>> <http://www.iowaattorneygeneral.org/>www.IowaAttorneyGeneral.org
>>> .  A jury entered a verdict Wednesday in this case in Polk County 
>>> District Court.
>>> Best regards,  Bram
>>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> -
>>>
>>> For immediate release - Thursday, February 19, 2009.
>>> Contact Bob Brammer - 515-281-6699
>>>
>>> Jury finds Iowa Department for the Blind's Guide Dog Policy Does Not 
>>> Discriminate
>>>
>>>             Des Moines.  A Polk County jury has rejected a Des 
>>> Moines woman's claim that the State of Iowa Department for the Blind 
>>> discriminated against her by refusing her request to use a guide dog 
>>> while she attended the Department's orientation and adjustment 
>>> training program.
>>>
>>>             The Department for the Blind orientation and training 
>>> program is a comprehensive program that utilizes a totally 
>>> non-visual approach to teaching blindness skills.  Students with 
>>> partial vision are required to wear eyeshades to prevent reliance 
>>> upon any visual cues during training.  Department policies prohibit 
>>> the use of any visual aids within the orientation and training 
>>> program, including guide dogs.  The Department has no objection to 
>>> guide dogs in other situations.
>>>
>>>             Stephanie Dohmen, who is legally blind, attended the 
>>> program for several months beginning in September 2000 and sought to 
>>> re-enter the program in June 2002 accompanied by her guide dog.
>>>
>>>             Dohmen claimed in her lawsuit that the Department's 
>>> policy violated her rights under the Iowa Civil Rights Act and under 
>>> federal laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis of 
>>> disability.
>>>
>>>             After a six-day trial, the eight-person jury rejected 
>>> Dohmen's claims in a verdict entered Wednesday.
>>>
>>>
>>>             The Department for the Blind, which was represented in 
>>> the trial by the Iowa Attorney General, argued that a totally 
>>> non-visual approach - and training without assistance of a guide-dog 
>>> or other visual aids - is the most effective approach for 
>>> visually-impaired persons who are learning skills and techniques for 
>>> dealing with blindness.
>>>
>>>             The Department places no limitations upon the use of 
>>> guide dogs in other settings, including in the Department for the 
>>> Blind
>>> building in downtown Des Moines.   For example,
>>> Karen Keninger, the Director of the Department, uses a guide dog, 
>>> and the dog accompanied Keninger during her testimony at the trial.
>>>
>>>             The orientation program typically includes about six 
>>> months of full-time training in various problem-solving skills, such 
>>> as cane-travel on public streets, using Braille, using computers, 
>>> and dealing with many other situations.
>>>
>>>             The Department for the Blind's orientation and 
>>> adjustment program was established in 1959 and is considered by many 
>>> to be one of the most effective in the country.
>>>
>>>             During the trial, the State Department for the Blind 
>>> presented testimony from Joanne Wilson and Frederic K. Schroeder, 
>>> each a former Commissioner of the U.S. Rehabilitation Services 
>>> Administration, which oversees programs for the blind around the 
>>> country.
>>>
>>>             "Iowa's orientation program profoundly changes lives," 
>>> said Wilson, who also is Executive Director of the National 
>>> Federation of the Blind.  "It works.  It's a cutting-edge program 
>>> and a model for other states."  Wilson is a Webster City native and 
>>> ISU graduate who went through the Iowa Department for the Blind's 
>>> orientation program herself.
>>>
>>>             Schroeder said:  "To me the central point is that 
>>> individuals have a choice in the type of training they take.  While 
>>> programs must and should make reasonable accommodations, they cannot 
>>> be required to alter the fundamentals of the program."
>>>
>>> - 30 -
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> humanser mailing list
>>> humanser at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/humanser_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
>>> for
>>> humanser:
>>
>>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/humanser_nfbnet.org/jbrown321%40
> comcas
> t.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> humanser mailing list
>>> humanser at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/humanser_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
>>> for
>>> humanser:
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/humanser_nfbnet.org/dgl%40dlee
>>> .org
>>
>> --
>> Doug Lee                 dgl at dlee.org                http://www.dlee.org
>> SSB BART Group           doug.lee at ssbbartgroup.com
>> http://www.ssbbartgroup.com
>> Freedom is not the ability to have what we want.  Freedom is merely 
>> the ability to seek it.  To be free defines what we can do, not what 
>> we can get.
>> (03/28/05)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> humanser mailing list
>> humanser at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/humanser_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> humanser:
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/humanser_nfbnet.org/scook%40sccb
> .sc.go
> v
>>
>> IMPORTANT NOTICE This transmission may contain information that is 
>> privileged, confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from 
>> disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended 
>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
>> distribution, or use
>
>> of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) 
>> is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and any 
>> attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that 
>> might affect any computer system into which it is received and 
>> opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it 
>> is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by SCCB., for any 
>> loss or damage arising in any
>
>> way from its use. If you received this transmission in error, please 
>> immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its 
>> entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> humanser mailing list
>> humanser at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/humanser_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> humanser:
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/humanser_nfbnet.org/swampfox1833
> %40ver
> izon.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> humanser mailing list
> humanser at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/humanser_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> humanser:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/humanser_nfbnet.org/sidney.schwa
> rtz%40
> sbcglobal.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> humanser mailing list
> humanser at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/humanser_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> humanser:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/humanser_nfbnet.org/melissa%40ri
> ccobon
> o.us
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.11.1/1961 - Release Date: 
> 2/19/2009
> 6:45 PM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.11.2/1963 - Release Date: 
> 2/20/2009
> 7:22 PM
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> humanser mailing list
> humanser at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/humanser_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> humanser:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/humanser_nfbnet.org/davidandlori
> stayer%40verizon.net
> 


_______________________________________________
humanser mailing list
humanser at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/humanser_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
humanser:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/humanser_nfbnet.org/mabullis%40hotmail
com





More information about the HumanSer mailing list