[nabs-l] Understanding Symbolic Logic textbook

[T. Joseph Carter]

Dave,

Were I your roommate, I would file a complaint with the Office for 
Civil Rights in the Department of Education straight away.  The 
university has an obligation to provide an accommodation here, and 
the recommendation not to take the course is no accommodation!

A good course in logic should be required study in my opinion because 
of the value I have gained from it.  It was required for the CS 
degree I originally worked toward, but has been applicable to every 
other field I have even investigated.

They would have the same trouble with a symbolic logic text that they 
have with a math text.  Do they recommend that he not take math 
either?  This is inexcusable.

Joseph

-- 
How many children in America are not taught how to read?
If they are blind, the answer is 90%.
Find out how you can help: http://www.braille.org/


On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 06:28:28PM -0500, Dave Wright wrote:
>Good evening all, 
>I have a roommate who is in the process of searching without success for a textbook for one of his classes. The title of the book is: Understanding symbolic logic, by Virginia Klenk 3rd Ed
>
>He's been told by a number of representatives from the university's office of disabilities to not take the class as they would have a difficult time converting the materials. As we all know, this can be a rather frustrating situation. Any thoughts concerning this matter would be much appreciated. 
>
>
>Best Regards:
>Dave Wright
>Work Phone: 347-422-7085
>Email:
>dwrigh6 at gmail.com
>WebPage:
>http://www.knfbreader.com
>_______________________________________________
>nabs-l mailing list
>nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nabs-l:
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/carter.tjoseph%40gmail.com