[nabs-l] Fw: Reading Rights Coalition Denounces Random House

[Beth]

We better not.  Thank God though for RFB and D and all those other
organizations that ae perhaps willing to fight back?  I'm all about
siding with the Reading Rights Coalition because we with print
disabilities need the text-to-speech thing on books in order to
readthem.  Also, I wouldn't wan a frien, parent, boyfriend, etc. to
have to read all the books to me if perhaps braille and talking books
went out of style.  What if we lived in a world in which publishers
didn't allow anybody to reproduce books in a specialized format so we
could read them?  Think about it.
Beth

On 5/20/09, Kevin Wassmer <commanderlumpy2003 at earthlink.net> wrote:
> I wouldn't be surprised if our corrupt government found a way to get rid of
> NLS or something like that. Our government is doing some very nasty things
> to its people. If you don't believe me go to The drudge Report, World Net
> daily, or other websites. I don't want to get off topic. But our government
> could find a way to get rid of NLS or something like that. It's c0oming.
> Just look at what happened to the credit card bill or something like that.
> It could happen. This is only the beginning of a good fight. But I hope the
> blind people won't go down without a fight.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nabs-l mailing list
> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nabs-l:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/thebluesisloose%40gmail.com
>