[nabs-l] Fw: [Fwd: [acb-l] FW: ALERT! Sign-On to Letter to Congressional Leadership Concerning Health Reform and Vision Loss]
Jim Reed
jim275_2 at yahoo.com
Thu May 28 08:48:26 UTC 2009
Homer Simpson's brain: "Use reverse psychology."
Homer: "Oh, that sounds too complicated."
Homer's brain: "Okay, don't use reverse psychology."
Homer: "Okay, I will!"
--- On Wed, 5/27/09, Gerald Hutch <modrepro at mt.net> wrote:
From: Gerald Hutch <modrepro at mt.net>
Subject: [Fwd: [acb-l] FW: ALERT! Sign-On to Letter to Congressional Leadership Concerning Health Reform and Vision Loss]
To: "Dan Burke" <burke.dall at gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 9:21 PM
FYI !
Comments?
Jerry Hutch
-------- Original Message --------
Subject:
[acb-l] FW: ALERT! Sign-On to Letter to Congressional
Leadership Concerning Health Reform and Vision Loss
Date:
Wed, 27 May 2009 19:37:12 -0700
From:
Andy Baracco <wq6r at socal.rr.com>
To:
acb-l at acb.org
CC:
acb-hsp at acb.org,ccb-l at googlegroups.com,blind-counselors at topica.com
From: AFB DirectConnect [mailto:blemoine at afb.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 10:33 AM
To: AFB Subscriber
Subject: ALERT! Sign-On to Letter to Congressional Leadership
Concerning Health Reform and Vision Loss
Sign-On to Letter to Congressional Leadership Concerning Health
Reform and Vision Loss
For further information, contact--
Mark Richert
Director, Public Policy
American Foundation for the Blind
202-822-0833
mrichert at afb.net
Leadership in Congress needs to hear from the vision loss community
immediately to ensure that policy addressing the unique health care
needs of people who are blind or visually impaired is part of
comprehensive health care reform legislation. You are invited to join
in a sign-on letter to be delivered by AFB next week to the chairs
and ranking members of the committees of the U.S. Senate and House of
Representatives with particular responsibility for health care
legislation. Copies of the letter will also be delivered to senior
House and Senate leadership of both parties.
If your organization can sign on to the letter below, please forward
the complete name of your organization (no abbreviations please) to
Barbara LeMoine (a href="mailtoblemoine at afb.net" blemoine at afb.net) by
noon on Wednesday, June 3.
Organizational names will be listed alphabetically at the end of the
letter; no actual signatures are necessary. We strongly encourage all
organizations of and for people who are blind or visually impaired to
join in this effort, and please share this sign-on request widely
inviting any groups beyond our field to join us as well.
The letter's text follows--
We, the undersigned organizations representing, serving, and
advocating for the more than 20 million Americans of all ages
experiencing significant vision loss, urge you to exercise your
leadership to ensure that any comprehensive health reform legislation
enacted by the 111th Congress adequately addresses the needs and
rights of individuals living with vision loss. Specifically, we call
upon Congress to send to President Obama legislation that, at a minimum
• ensures that individuals with vision loss and other disabilities
can properly identify and take medications by mandating appropriate
labeling standards and methods for providing nonvisual and enhanced
visual access to drug container labeling and related information;
• establishes clear Medicare (or other national minimum benefit plan)
coverage for, and fosters broader private plan availability of, low
vision devices and other medically necessary assistive technologies; and
• allows orientation and mobility specialists, vision rehabilitation
therapists, and low vision therapists to be full participants in the
professional team providing specialized services to people with
vision loss by establishing unambiguous Medicare (or other national
minimum benefit plan) reimbursement for the services such professionals offer.
Congress is currently weighing a variety of health care policy
options that have the potential to fundamentally transform the scope
and delivery of health care to all Americans. While many of these
policy options could be of significant benefit to Americans with
vision loss, we are concerned that proper attention is not being
given in the policy debate to several basic health care needs
experienced by people who are blind or visually impaired. We
therefore ask for your help to craft and enact policy solutions as
part of health care reform to address these unmet needs.
Drug Label Information
Current Law: No state in the union clearly requires labeling of
prescription or other medications to be accessible to individuals
with vision loss through minimum large print font size, audible
labeling technologies, tactile markings or braille, or other methods
calculated to provide alternatives to visual use of medication
labeling and related information. Moreover, current federal law
places no meaningful requirements on such labeling to ensure
nonvisual and enhanced visual access. Additionally, while retail
pharmacies can be held accountable for providing some degree of
access to label information under the Americans with Disabilities
Act, the ADA neither provides standards for pharmacies to follow nor
establishes a consistent national policy ensuring that customers
will, upon request, be provided the nonvisual or enhanced visual
means of their choice to use drug labeling safely and independently.
The failure to make medication labeling accessible to people with
vision loss has been shown to lead to significant health risks (see
e.g., consumer survey conducted by the American Foundation for the
Blind at www.afb.org/labels).
Proposed Policy: Congress should enact legislation requiring retail
pharmacies to offer, upon the request of a customer, nonvisual or
enhanced visual means for using medication labeling and related print
information safely and independently. The means to accomplish label
accessibility must be the means of the customer's choice and conform
to national minimum standards to ensure customer privacy, consistency
and reliability.
Low Vision Devices and Other Medically Necessary Assistive Technology
Current Law: Very few private health plans offer customers access to
low vision devices or other assistive technologies that maximize
remaining usable vision or otherwise provide nonvisual access to
information and the environment. Moreover, the Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid Services (CMS) refuse Medicare coverage of any device
that employs one or more lenses regardless of a device's other
technological features simply on the grounds that devices using
lenses fall within the long-standing statutory bar on coverage for
eye glasses. Other categories of assistive technology are routinely
denied coverage on the grounds that they are convenience items, are
not primarily for use in the home, or on other erroneous bases.
People with vision loss can use low vision devices and other
assistive technologies to manage their health care needs, properly
identify medications, maintain proper diet, and ensure safe mobility
at home and in community. Along with appropriate rehabilitation
services, low vision devices and other assistive technologies prevent
injury and the acquiring of additional disabling conditions.
Proposed Policy: Congress must overturn the CMS regulation barring
coverage for low vision devices and establish clear criteria for
their provision. Such criteria should acknowledge other distinctive
features employed by the most valuable low vision devices, other than
their mere use of a lens, such as a device's integration of a light
source, use of electrical power, or other distinctive features. In
addition, Congress must establish clear parameters for CMS to follow
to provide Medicare beneficiaries with vision loss access to
assistive technologies meeting their unique needs.
Vision Rehabilitation
Current Law: Medicare currently pays for some forms of vision
rehabilitation services provided under the direct supervision of a
physician and offered by an array of state licensed personnel.
However, orientation and mobility specialists, vision rehabilitation
therapists, and low vision therapists, professionals who are
explicitly trained to provide such vision rehabilitation services,
are not among the professional disciplines recognized for purposes of
Medicare reimbursement. This means that, while the services offered
by other professionals--such as occupational and physical
therapists--are services provided by personnel who are regularly part
of the team of providers offering some limited form of vision
rehabilitation addressing, for example, a beneficiary's needs for
daily living skills training or other related services, the
professional team is incomplete. As a result, beneficiaries are not
ensured access to the full range of quality services, such as
orientation and mobility, provided by the best qualified professional
disciplines. Moreover, since the limited vision rehabilitation-like
services that CMS will pay for must be provided under strict
physician supervision, these services, which are most relevant when
offered in a beneficiary's home or in community, are diminished in
effectiveness. Finally, a Medicare demonstration project currently
being undertaken to assess vision rehabilitation reimbursement has
such significant design and administrative flaws that Congress should
not wait for its conclusions or have confidence in their validity.
Proposed Policy: Congress must establish unambiguous coverage for the
services offered to Medicare beneficiaries by orientation and
mobility specialists, vision rehabilitation therapists, and low
vision therapists to allow the most qualified and complete team of
professional service providers to meet the unique needs of
individuals with vision loss. Such services should be allowed to be
provided in a beneficiary's home and community to maximize their effectiveness.
Thank you for your thoughtful consideration and for your advocacy on
behalf of Americans living with vision loss. We look forward to
working closely with you as health reform moves forward.
Respectfully,
[organizations listed alphabetically]
More information about the NABS-L
mailing list