[nabs-l] Security in ourselves, acceptance in others
Chris Nusbaum
dotkid.nusbaum at gmail.com
Tue May 31 22:57:05 UTC 2011
Or on the flip side, "What will the NFB think of this?" "Will
this be an example of NFB philosophy?" "Am I being independent
enough to be a
true Federationist?"
Chris
"A loss of sight, never a loss of vision!" (Camp Abilities motto)
--- Sent from my BrailleNote
----- Original Message -----
From: Jedi <loneblindjedi at samobile.net
To: nabs-l at nfbnet.org
Date sent: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:36:35 -0400
Subject: Re: [nabs-l] Security in ourselves, acceptance in others
Excellent points.
I'm going to add to that some.
I've noticed that we also tend to judge a person's actions when
they
attempt to handle a vexing situation like overhelpfulness or
discrimination. I've been doing some research on the effects of
such
judgment and have concluded that it creates an invisible audience
for
the blind person in question. This audience is made of both the
blind
and the sighted community and creates thoughts like "What will my
blind
friends and colleagues think of me if I react this or that way?
What
will the sighted person I'm talking to think? What will sighted
bystanders think?" What this does is create a win/lose situation
where
the stakes are high. Aside from causing stress that limits
problem-solving ability, this high stakes situation also creates
a
greater likelihood of negative response to perceived threats to
the
blind person's self-concept and sense of efficacy in the
interaction.
So for example, an overly helpful person might cause a blind
person to
feel ineffective as it is. But the invisible audience concept
boosts
that feeling considerably because of the stress involved with
feeling
like they have to show themselves as both effective and graceful
in
handling both the offers of help and the person who's offering
it. Is
any of this making sense? So the bottom line is that by trying to
be
the perfect ambassador for the blind, we may be shooting
ourselves in
the foot by creating such a high stakes situation in our mind
that the
stress lowers our ability to present the cool, calm, and
effective
image we want to offer to the public.
On that note, I've noticed that our community seems to have it in
our
heads that we're responsible for how the sighted feel about us.
The
truth is that there are limits to that responsibility. Sure, we
want to
set a good impression in all areas, but so does everyone else.
The sad
truth is that we are judged based on the actions of one person.
But the
thing is, there's nothing that we can really do about that except
to
expose a given sighted person to the diversity of our population.
Even
if we set the perfect impression, it's likely that the sighted
person
will still stereotype by saying that we're all amazing or that
the one
individual in question is the exception to a rule. It seems to
me that
the only people who really get that we're as diverse as they are
are
those who know how to deconstruct society's grand narrative or
are
those who have seen enough diversity in our population to realize
that
they can't judge all of us based on one person.
Respectfully,
Jedi
Original message:
That makes perfect sense, but we should not fall into the trap
of
taking responsibility for others' actions. When we do that, we
lose
sight of our own goals and direction in life. Unless you're a
therapist, or a rehab teacher working with people like that, it
is not
your job to fix them. Even as a therapist or teacher, your
place is to
be a mentor and an instructor. As I previously said, if that
person,
after being shown compassion and alternative ways of thinking,
doing
and living chooses to fall back into old patterns as soon as the
instructor's back is turned, that shows a lack of respect for
everyone
around them, including themselves. So if a person wants to
wallow in
misery and self-pity, let them! That person will either fall
hard when
they find out their parents/family members/significant other or
what
have you can't take care of them forever, and then they'll
realize
what needs to happen in due time, or they will get sick of the
status
quo and want to change it. And if people hold it against a
decent
blind person because they've met a person like that in the past,
it's
not worth it to try and make them feel any differently. They
will
either come around in time or they won't. Choice is the key
word here.
Everyone is free to think as they choose so long as it's not
hurting
anyone. So, while it might temporarily sting a bit to lose out
on a
potential friendship due to someone's ignorance, as soon as you
meet
someone who's worth your time, you forget about that other
person real
quick
On 5/26/11, Daniel Romero <djdan567 at gmail.com> wrote:
I think the reason why this might go down is because of the view
that
we get from the public in general. Most people who are sighted
are not
used to a blind person. You have to understand that one blind
person
being seen is a huge thing. They're now reliable for what a
person
thinks about blind people. They are the ones setting an
example. So if
you have a blind person who smells bad, rocks, pokes their eyes
or
just do not have the proper skills, the outside person will make
an
assumtion and say that all blind people are like that. i'm not
saying
it's right for blind people to call out other blind people with
a
skills set that is lower then theirs, they're just calling them
out
because they are representing blind people. It puts a bad label
on us
blind people who do take care of ourselves, have the skills to
be
independent and succeed. like i said, i'm not saying it's right
but I
don't think us who do have the skills want to have a negative
conotation. Not all blind people poke their eyes, rock, hop,
twitch,bump into everything, smell bad, do not clean their own
clothes, or anything like that. So to be part of a group that's
going
to display such a view that is negative to the public, we fall
right
behind that. Am I making sense?
_______________________________________________
nabs-l mailing list
nabs-l at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account
info for
nabs-l:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/turtlepow
er17%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________
nabs-l mailing list
nabs-l at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account
info for nabs-l:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/loneblind
jedi%40samobile.net
--
Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network.
Visit
www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere.
_______________________________________________
nabs-l mailing list
nabs-l at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
for nabs-l:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/dotkid.nu
sbaum%40gmail.com
More information about the NABS-L
mailing list