[nabs-l] National Federation of the BlindApplaudsNewJerseyRuling on Braille Instruction for Blind Child

Ashley Bramlett bookwormahb at earthlink.net
Sun May 13 20:17:20 UTC 2012


Mark,
do you ever write braille then? if not you must be a really good auditory 
learner.
I suppose you write all your notes on a computer then using print 
conventions.
Since you did not like braille in school, did you still use large print?

Me, I used both. I used braille once I knew it efficiently and used print 
for math because they said it was a bit easier to  lay out spatial 
relationships which IMO is true. Lot easier to place numbers here and there 
on a page versus rolling a piece of braille paper up and down.

Anyway, if you made it with auditory learning in school and did well,  I 
suspect you are the exception.

Ashley

-----Original Message----- 
From: Marc Workman
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 12:59 PM
To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
Subject: Re: [nabs-l] National Federation of the 
BlindApplaudsNewJerseyRuling on Braille Instruction for Blind Child

Ashley,

I'm not sure why you interpret me as saying a blind child can learn to read 
using audio alone. If you could go back and pull out a specific sentence I 
wrote where I said this, that would be useful to me.

For the record, I think it's probably technically possible for a totally 
blind child to learn to read and write using only a screen reader. Grammar 
and spelling is about learning rules, and though print/Braille makes 
learning these rules exponentially easier, I suspect it is possible to do it 
without either. I want to emphasize that I'm only saying this may 
*technically* be possible. I'm sure it would be much harder, and I can't 
think of why it would ever be preferential to choose this path when either 
print or Braille is available. That said, my point has nothing to do with 
this, and I of course believe that blind children should be taught either 
print or Braille. Let me say this again since it seems to be causing the 
most confusion and misunderstanding: blind children should be taught either 
print or Braille. There is no doubt about this question.

I think a couple of much less clear cut questions are in which cases is 
Braille or print appropriate, and in which cases is Braille more of a 
hindrance than a help. This is what I'm gesturing at. Slogans like "without 
Braille, you fail", if taken literally, suggest that Braille is essential 
for success. Perhaps I shouldn't take it literally, but my concern is that 
so many seem to believe this as a fact, and I think that can lead to 
situations, like mine, where Braille is forced on a child even though the 
hundreds of hours spent learning Braille could more effectively have been 
spent learning some other skill. I don't know; I think it's at least 
something to think about.

Regards,

Marc
On 2012-05-12, at 8:32 PM, Ashley Bramlett wrote:

> Mark,
> I just don't see how you learn without braille. Sure we all do it. I did 
> it in high school because the volumes of braille would be impractical to 
> take home. I had gobbs of reading for english, all those novels! I had too 
> much reading in fact as they pile on homework in high school. However, by 
> then I could read and write. I knew how to spell; I knew such things as 
> what a paragraph is, what a sentence, where to place my periods and 
> commas, although I'll admit I still don't know all comma rules,
> and I knew what was capitalized.  So what I'm saying for a young child is 
> you have to have a foundation and see the written word, print or braille, 
> and then sure once you have a foundation you can transfer to audio.
> But really, I fail to see how you learn without braille in the early 
> grades as you are learning how to write.
> I do see your points; you can be successful with mostly auditory learning. 
> Heck since junior high school when we got more homework, I did more and 
> more auditorily, but I did have a foundation in reading and writing.
> That to me is the key.  I was also successful with more auditory learning. 
> But I could not learn without braille to this day. Although I have no TVI 
> to transcribe handouts in braille, no texts in braille, no research 
> material in braille, I do use braille everyday in my own notes. I take 
> notes with my braille note. I also have to ask for spellings so I can 
> write foreign or proper names in print for my papers as when reading it I 
> only hear it spoken and do not always know how to spell it. I write the 
> correct spelling in braille. By writing in braille, it helps me learn and 
> remember the spelling.
>
>
>
> As Josh  said "without braille, you fail."
> Ashley
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Marc Workman
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 9:20 PM
> To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
> Subject: Re: [nabs-l] National Federation of the Blind 
> ApplaudsNewJerseyRuling on Braille Instruction for Blind Child
>
> Chris,
>
> According to your definition, someone who needs glasses to read print is 
> also illiterate because the glasses might break. Literacy is complicated. 
> A Braille reader that loses both her hands doesn't suddenly become 
> illiterate to my mind. Nor does a print reader become illiterate after 
> becoming blind.
>
> The only thing I take issue with is the idea that Braille is essential for 
> success. To put the point as Josh does in another message: "without 
> Braille, you fail". Sorry, but this is factually incorrect. There are too 
> many examples of successful blind people who cannot read Braille. I get 
> why this is the message that is put forward. I imagine it's useful for 
> motivating children to learn Braille, and it's no doubt politically 
> expedient when advocating for more funding to teach Braille, both of which 
> I understand and support, but I also suspect I'm not a total anomaly, and 
> there are children wasting time learning Braille as I did. Or, to put it 
> another way, there are children who might be forced unnecessarily to learn 
> Braille if more people held the attitudes promoted in some of the messages 
> I've read. Overall, more children would probably benefit than suffer, but 
> some children certainly would suffer, in the sense that they would be 
> dragged out of class and required to learn a skill that they will never 
> really make use of.
>
> I probably should just stay quiet, as I believe Braille is a powerful 
> tool, but it's difficult to sit back and say nothing when I hear 
> propaganda-like slogans such as "without Braille, you fail".
>
> Best,
>
> Marc
> On 2012-05-12, at 3:22 PM, Chris Nusbaum wrote:
>
>> Good points, Marc.  What I mean by "illiterate" is simply that you can't 
>> effectively and efficiently read written text independently.  Yes, you 
>> can use audio, but that technology might break...
>>
>> Chris Nusbaum
>>
>> "For we walk by faith, not by sight."
>> 2 Corinthians 5:7
>>
>> Sent from my BrailleNote
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Marc Workman <mworkman.lists at gmail.com
>> To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list 
>> <nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>> sent: Thu, 10 May 2012 08:40:45 -0700
>> Subject: Re: [nabs-l] National Federation of the Blind Applauds 
>> NewJerseyRuling on Braille Instruction for Blind Child
>>
>> I guess I'm in a small minority of those who had Braille forced on them 
>> as a child.  I resisted it with every argument an eight year old can 
>> muster. At several times throughout my primary and secondary education, I 
>> was made to learn and relearn Braille even though I didn't use it then 
>> and have rarely used it since.
>>
>> Please don't misunderstand me, I'm not saying I was right to resist. 
>> There are lots of things that children resist learning for one reason or 
>> another (e.g.,second and third languages, musical instruments, dance), 
>> and all of these skills contribute to the production of a more 
>> well-rounded and talented person.  Braille falls into this category for 
>> me.  Knowing it better would likely help me get a job, but so too would 
>> being more fluent in french, particularly in Canada.
>>
>> Where I do take issue, and I've expressed this before, is with statements 
>> like this one from Chris:
>>
>> "Without Braille, we can't read or write."
>>
>> And I'm not picking on you, Chris, I could have found others making the 
>> same point in this thread.  If Chris's statement is true, then this email 
>> and every essay I wrote in my undergrad, masters, and PhD programs were 
>> written by someone who is illiterate.  Without being too immodest, I 
>> think I write better than a majority of sighted people, and that's not 
>> bad for an illiterate person.
>>
>> Any child that wants to learn Braille or any parents that want that for 
>> their children should receive the instruction they desire.  Adults too 
>> should receive the support to learn Braille if they so desire.  What I 
>> think is worth pointing out is that Braille isn't necessary for blind 
>> people to be able to read and write, Braille isn't necessary for blind 
>> people to be successful, and in some cases, mine in particular, the 
>> dozens of hours spent learning Braille may more effectively be spent 
>> learning other skills.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Marc
>> On 2012-05-08, at 5:41 PM, Chris Nusbaum wrote:
>>
>> A big amen to that! I couldn't have said it any better! I was actually
>> having a similar conversation with my school librarian today, who asked 
>> me
>> whether I saw Braille withering away with the advancement of audio
>> technology.  I told her I didn't, and even if I could see that happening, 
>> I
>> wouldn't want it.  Why do I not see Braille going away? Because there are
>> enough blind people who are passionate about Braille to prevent that from
>> happening! Why would I want Braille to continue as the primary source of
>> reading and writing for the blind? Because reading books in audio format,
>> although it is a good method for reading materials sometimes, isn't true
>> literacy.  Braille is our form of literacy.  Without Braille, we can't 
>> read or
>> write.  This means that we can't get a job, or go to college, or keep up 
>> with
>> our sighted peers.  So, I think we definitely still need Braille because 
>> it
>> is our form of literacy, and if we get rid of Braille, we should get rid 
>> of
>> print too!
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org] On 
>> Behalf
>> Of Arielle Silverman
>> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 10:42 PM
>> To: National Association of Blind Students mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [nabs-l] FW: National Federation of the Blind Applauds
>> NewJersey Ruling on Braille Instruction for Blind Child
>>
>> It's sad that this required three years of legal contention to resolve.
>> What's even sadder is that for thousands of other children, these battles
>> aren't being won in the end or even being fought in the first place. 
>> Parents
>> capitulate to the professionals' insistence that their child doesn't need
>> Braille, or they want to fight but don't have the time, energy or legal
>> resources to stick it out.
>> The saddest thing of all, and an irony too, is that so much of the denial 
>> of
>> Braille instruction is being perpetrated by the very people entrusted to
>> promote and teach Braille--teachers of the blind! I just read a few weeks
>> ago about a preschool child whose TVI refused to provide her with Braille
>> copies of the storybooks her classmates were given in school.  Instead, 
>> the
>> teacher thought it sufficient to give the child stuffed toys representing
>> the characters in the stories.  I can understand using toys to substitute 
>> for
>> the pictures, but if the sighted kids are getting copies of the stories, 
>> why
>> not give the exact same content to the blind child as well? I might add 
>> that
>> in today's electronic world, and even before computers existed, 
>> transcribing
>> a book for preschoolers is not difficult.  And even in this case with the
>> Millers, the NJ Commission for the Blind backed the school's decision not 
>> to
>> provide Braille.  If even the folks who are charged to teach us literacy
>> don't stand behind Braille, who will? In my opinion a certified teacher 
>> of
>> blind children who refuses to teach Braille, or who refuses to hold their
>> students to competitive reading standards, is not deserving of that
>> certificate.
>> I sincerely hope that this victory will set a meaningful precedent to 
>> bring
>> about big changes for those parents who are fighting for Braille today 
>> and
>> in the future.
>> Arielle
>>
>> On 5/7/12, Joshua Lester <jlester8462 at students.pccua.edu> wrote:
>> How old is the child?
>> I got Braille instruction, when I was just starting school!
>> Why is it, that they did this, with this child?
>> Any word on how old he is?
>> Thanks, Joshua
>>
>> On 5/7/12, Ashley Bramlett <bookwormahb at earthlink.net> wrote:
>> I agree, how  sad.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Loren
>> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 8:09 PM
>> To: 'National Association of Blind Students mailing list' ;
>> blindtlk at nfbnet.org ; nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> Subject: Re: [nabs-l] FW: National Federation of the Blind Applauds
>> NewJersey Ruling on Braille Instruction for Blind Child
>>
>> It's extremely sad that this took 3 years to come to this decision.
>> Would
>> anyone deny a sighted child print instruction for that long?
>> Congrats to the Millers for sticking with it.  You did a great thing for
>> your child.
>>
>> Loren Wakefield
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>> Behalf Of Chris Nusbaum
>> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 5:54 PM
>> To: blindtlk at nfbnet.org; 'National Association of Blind Students
>> mailing list'; nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> Subject: [nabs-l] FW: National Federation of the Blind Applauds New
>> Jersey Ruling on Braille Instruction for Blind Child
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Freeh, Jessica [mailto:JFreeh at nfb.org]
>> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 8:57 AM
>> To: Undisclosed recipients:
>> Subject: National Federation of the Blind Applauds New Jersey Ruling on
>> Braille Instruction for Blind Child
>>
>>
>>
>> FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
>>
>>
>>
>> CONTACT:
>>
>> Chris Danielsen
>>
>> Director of Public Relations
>>
>> National Federation of the Blind
>>
>> (410) 659-9314, extension 2330
>>
>> (410) 262-1281 (Cell)
>>
>> <mailto:cdanielsen at nfb.org> cdanielsen at nfb.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> National Federation of the Blind Applauds New Jersey Ruling on Braille
>> Instruction for Blind Child
>>
>>
>> After Three-Year Battle, Hank Miller Will Receive Braille Instruction
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Oceanport, New Jersey (May 7, 2012): After a three-year administrative
>> and
>> legal battle against their local school board, the Oceanport Board of
>> Education, Jeffrey and Holly Miller obtained a ruling (docket number:
>> 2011
>> 17218) from an administrative law judge that their eleven-year-old son
>> Henry
>> "Hank" Miller was improperly denied instruction in Braille, the reading
>> and
>> writing code for the blind.  The legal victory, obtained with the
>> assistance
>> of the National Federation of the Blind <http://www.nfb.org/>  (NFB),
>> comes
>> on the heels of
>>
>> <http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/speced/Letter%20to%20Secretary%20
>> Duncan%20re
>> %20Braille%20Literacy.pdf> a letter from 26 U.S.  Senators urging the
>> Department of Education to take steps to ensure that blind children who
>> need
>> Braille instruction receive it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Holly and Jeffrey Miller brought the legal case on behalf of their son,
>> Hank, whom they adopted from China and who is blind due to albinism and
>> nystagmus.  Hank has limited vision that allows him to read enlarged
>> print
>> for short periods of time, but he is unable to read for sustained periods
>> of
>> time.  Although Hank's parents continued to tell school officials that
>> their
>> son was experiencing visual fatigue and was having difficulty reading,
>> the
>> school board and its consultant, the New Jersey Commission for the Blind
>> and
>> Visually Impaired (CBVI), insisted that Hank was a proficient print
>> reader,
>> notwithstanding his continued placement in a special resource room for
>> language arts.  In a nearly ten-day hearing, held under the due process
>> provisions of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act
>> of
>> 2004, Mrs.  Miller testified that she watched Hank routinely struggle 
>> with
>> his homework, suffering from eye strain and fatigue, but was unable to
>> convince school officials or the CBVI that Hank needed Braille
>> instruction.
>> She also testified that Hank's schoolwork was not of the same quantity
>> and
>> quality as that of his classmates.  Although experts from the school and
>> the
>> commission claimed that Hank was a "visual learner" and should
>> participate
>> in the "sighted world," experts hired by the Millers and the NFB
>> concluded
>> after thorough assessment that Hank could not read print for extended
>> periods of time without eye strain, neck and back pain, fatigue, and loss
>> of
>> reading speed and comprehension.
>>
>>
>>
>> In her order, Administrative Law Judge Lisa James-Beavers found that the
>> school board and the commission displayed a clear "bias against Braille."
>> She found that the school board and the commission had failed to assess
>> Hank's "sustained reading ability" with print, relying instead on reading
>> assessments involving only brief passages, and citing Hank's alleged
>> failure
>> to complain about struggling to read print.  The judge was unconvinced by
>> the board and CBVI's contention that Hank could rely on audio technology
>> as
>> reading demands increased through his school years, noting that "as
>> pointed
>> out by all of petitioners' well-qualified experts, listening does not
>> equate
>> to reading.  One does not enhance the active skill of comprehending text
>> by
>> passively listening, even if one is following along with the reading."
>> The
>> order noted that "the CBVI failed to do what Oceanport relied on them to
>> do,
>> which is to help construct a program that would give H.M.  meaningful
>> educational benefit considering H.M.'s future needs."  Judge
>> James-Beavers
>> ordered that Hank Miller be provided with Braille instruction for
>> forty-five
>> minutes, five days a week, and that the school board provide compensatory
>> instruction because of the three years that Hank was not provided with
>> Braille instruction, in the form of intensive Braille summer programs or
>> tutoring.
>>
>>
>>
>> Dr.  Marc Maurer, President of the National Federation of the Blind, 
>> said:
>> "Based on the experience of countless parents of blind children and blind
>> adults who had never learned Braille and have contacted us over the
>> years,
>> the National Federation of the Blind has consistently argued that blind
>> children are being improperly assessed and denied Braille instruction
>> when
>> it is clearly appropriate.  Now after a thorough and comprehensive
>> examination of the evidence in Hank Miller's case, an independent judge
>> has
>> confirmed what we always knew.  We hope that school and agency officials
>> across the nation take note of this landmark ruling and commit to giving
>> blind children access to Braille, the true key to literacy for the vast
>> majority of children who are blind or losing vision.  The National
>> Federation of the Blind will continue to stand with families like the
>> Millers who find themselves pitted against the educational establishment
>> in
>> obtaining the equal education to which their children are entitled and
>> which
>> they deserve."
>>
>>
>>
>> Holly Miller, Hank's mother, said: "I am obviously thrilled with this
>> ruling, although I am still saddened that it took such a prolonged battle
>> to
>> achieve it.  I am stepping forward to tell Hank's story in hopes that
>> other
>> parents of blind children will not have to struggle as we did.  I thank
>> the
>> National Federation of the Blind and all of the individuals and experts
>> who
>> came forward to assist in this case.  I plan to strongly and publicly
>> advocate with the National Federation of the Blind for Braille
>> instruction
>> for blind children."
>>
>>
>>
>> The plaintiffs are represented in this matter by Sharon Krevor-Weisbaum
>> of
>> the Baltimore firm Brown, Goldstein, and Levy, and Jayne M.  Wesler of 
>> the
>> Cranbury firm Sussan and Greenwald.
>>
>>
>>
>> For more information about the National Federation of the Blind, please
>> visit www.nfb.org <http://www.nfb.org/> .  For more information about
>> Braille, the reading and writing code for the blind, please visit
>> www.braille.org <http://www.braille.org/> .
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ###
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> About the National Federation of the Blind
>>
>>
>>
>> With more than 50,000 members, the National Federation of the Blind is
>> the
>> largest and most influential membership organization of blind people in
>> the
>> United States.  The NFB improves blind people's lives through advocacy,
>> education, research, technology, and programs encouraging independence
>> and
>> self-confidence.  It is the leading force in the blindness field today 
>> and
>> the voice of the nation's blind.  In January 2004 the NFB opened the
>> National
>> Federation of the Blind Jernigan Institute, the first research and
>> training
>> center in the United States for the blind led by the blind.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nabs-l mailing list
>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> nabs-l:
>>
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/isaiah5719%40
>> mchsi.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nabs-l mailing list
>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> nabs-l:
>>
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/bookwormahb%4
>> 0earthlink.
>> net
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nabs-l mailing list
>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> nabs-l:
>>
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/jlester8462%4
>> 0students.p
>> ccua.edu
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nabs-l mailing list
>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> nabs-l:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/arielle71%40g
>> mail.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nabs-l mailing list
>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> nabs-l:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/dotkid.nusbau
>> m%40gmail.c
>> om
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nabs-l mailing list
>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
>> nabs-l:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/mworkman.list
>> s%40gmail.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nabs-l mailing list
>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
>> nabs-l:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/dotkid.nusbau
>> m%40gmail.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nabs-l mailing list
>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
>> nabs-l:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/mworkman.lists%40gmail.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nabs-l mailing list
> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> nabs-l:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/bookwormahb%40earthlink.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> nabs-l mailing list
> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> nabs-l:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/mworkman.lists%40gmail.com


_______________________________________________
nabs-l mailing list
nabs-l at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
nabs-l:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/bookwormahb%40earthlink.net 





More information about the NABS-L mailing list