[nabs-l] update on rehab affairs

Beth Taurasi denverqueen1107 at comcast.net
Tue Aug 27 23:41:00 UTC 2013


Hey you all, this is a brief update as nothing much has happened in the 
saga of me and Rehab.
I have contacted Client Assistance program rep Anna French, if any 
Coloradoans have known who she was.  Or is.  Sorry about the miswording 
there.  I contacted Anna French twice and left two messages, and have 
contacts else where and around the U.S. I can reach, but it seems none 
of my contacts will get back to me.  Shoot, I don't know what to do 
next.  I think I'm going to see about resolving the issue like this, see 
if anyone has any ideas for this:
1. The counselor must be changed.
2. The services must be provided and compensatory funds must be provided 
for all technological stuff I am asking for, no matter the plans.
3. A plan must be written up, no wait list, nothing.  And in this plan, 
we need to do an employment goal of computers and stuff, like web 
design, networking, IT basically.  I want to get an IT certification 
from CISCO, so they should ideally pay for something accessible and not 
something that would require too much paying in advance accommodations 
and such.  I'd chosen CISCO Academy of the Visually Impaired because it 
accommodates blind people and teaches all the skills needed to do Linux 
and stuff, networking and the like.
3. Any psychological evaluations must be carefully mmonitored and if a 
racial profiling like that which occurred in 2011, in which the doc 
wrote that I was pretending to be Arab occurs in the form of, 
"pretending to be Syrian/Catholic", I will ask that the doc be revoked 
of his license.  I am already thinking about actions to take against the 
doc because Richele, my counselor current, has the copy that says I was 
pretending to be Arab and didn't think to shred and get a copy without 
the Arab comments.  One more thing in the resolution, if they refuse to 
put together an employment goal that I write for myself, then I will 
drop the case with them and sue them for lost wages and compensatory 
damages related to racial profiling.
This may all sound weird, but how does this all sound to the public as a 
whole?  SHould I go about this?  If they refuse to do as I ask since the 
social skills group isn't available and since this provider is notorious 
for being not only white/American biased but sighted and custodially 
biased, do you think this is good?
Thanks you all,
Beth Taurasi




More information about the NABS-L mailing list