[nagdu] Jury finds IA Dept. forBlind'sguidedog policy does notdiscriminate
Hope Paulos
hope.paulos at maine.edu
Sat Feb 21 01:39:03 UTC 2009
Hi Alysha. That's exactly what I'd like to see. I also agree
that cane skills are important, but I mainly want to attend the
NFB center to improve cooking, home management, and perhaps some
specific computer programs like xl or power point. I can't seem
to find a program either, and I think there should be one. It
would teach Nfb philosophy, but be more individualized to the
student. Not every student learns the same.
> ----- Original Message -----
>From: "Alysha" <anjeans at att.net
>To: "NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog
Users" <nagdu at nfbnet.org
>Date sent: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:07:44 -0600
>Subject: Re: [nagdu] Jury finds IA Dept. forBlind'sguidedog
policy does notdiscriminate
>As others have mentioned in their posts, I think we need to
consider that
>much more than just cane travel is offered at training centers.
So say
>there's a guide dog user who is comfortable with mobility but who
needs some
>work on cooking or technology or braille. Then, there doesn't
seem to be a
>program out there this person could attend to learn the necessary
skills
>without risking damage to their relationship with their dog. I
do think that
>cane travel is quite important and that all guide dog users
should be
>comfortable with it, but it seems like all the training centers
I've heard
>about mandate it as the only means of mobility to be used during
the time
>one is there. So I suppose I'm wondering why there are no
programs (that I
>know of) that accommodate the potential needs of guide dog users
instead of
>expecting them to essentially temporarily give up their chosen
mobility aid.
>The important thing is that we can get around independently, not
whether we
>do so with a dog or a cane. Why is it that people seem to link
mobility
>classes only with cane travel? I think a guide dog user could
still benefit
>from mobility lessons that aren't focused on the training of the
dog. The
>problem solving and orientation skills taught in good mobility
programs are
>useful to you no matter what mobility aid you use. So I think it
is fair for
>a program to demand competency with a cane, but I do not think
that it is
>right to restrict the choices of guide dog users to either doing
without
>training in the myriad of skills taught at centers or giving up
the use of
>their dogs for a significant fraction of the day.
>Alysha
>_______________________________________________
>nagdu mailing list
>nagdu at nfbnet.org
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
for nagdu:
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/hope.paulo
s%40maine.edu
More information about the NAGDU
mailing list