[nagdu] NFB and Dogs

[Cindy Ray]

Well, I never said that this isn't an unfair and judgmental statement, but I can't think you've never questioned whether someone was doing well by their dog either because of how you were trained or what you perceived. Someone once called The Seeing Eye because they thought I was an incompetent dog handler, so sure, we probably more often than not judge such things without knowing the whole story. 

CL

On Aug 13, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Dan Weiner wrote:

> What is your definition of an incompetent handler?
> Are those of us with dogs who feel we know what we are doing now judge and
> jury of those we don't approve of?
> My definition of a dog guide team that's working is that the person an is
> happy with the dog and that they're dong what they want to do, getting out
> etc.
> 
> 
> I'm just responding to your phrase about how we all don't like to see
> incompetent handlers.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf
> Of Cindy Ray
> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 12:43 PM
> To: the National Association of Guide Dog Users NAGDU Mailing List
> Subject: [nagdu] NFB and Dogs
> 
> The NFB's attitude toward has done a total turn about. It may well have been
> more the individuals than the organization, and, of course, when the Iowa
> Orientation Center was started, that was clearly a plan that would not
> include dogs. If you think about how long ago that was, the use of dogs
> hadn't been nearly as wide spread as it is now. We all know that we don't
> like to see poorly behaved dogs and people who appear to be incompetent
> handlers to us; I think that is true anywhere, especially where people know
> about dogs. I think the fact that we have now this larger and more powerful
> division in NFB that deals with the needs and rights of guide dogs, the fact
> that there is now a relief area at the NFB National Center, the numbers who
> are coming to convention with dogs speaks volumes about the attitude. That
> isn't to say everyone's attitude has changed, but as we are changing what it
> means to be blind we are also changing the attitude about the use of dogs.
> There have been other evolving attitudes. I think that people who say that
> the NFB doesn't like dogs are spouting off old news and, perhaps somewhat
> inaccurate news at that. This may vary some in affiliates. When I moved back
> to Iowa with my dog, a dog which I did not have when I left here, I expected
> to have a problem with that. I was even told that I couldn't expect people
> to "make over" my dog. Well, people in Iowa and in the NFB liked dogs as
> much as the next person, I wasn't treated much differently from anyone else,
> at least not because of the dog <Grin> and my dogs and I have been welcomed
> at NFB functions. I think we all have to shout it from the roof tops: dogs
> are welcomed in the NFB!
> 
> CL
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nagdu mailing list
> nagdu at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/dcwein%40dcwein.cnc.n
> et
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nagdu mailing list
> nagdu at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/cindyray%40gmail.com