[nagdu] Diner Must Provide Access, Not Civility

Vanessa Lowery vlowery at dhr.state.md.us
Mon Jul 30 18:16:57 UTC 2012


Well, don't know about others, but I don't patronize a place of business to determine if I win a popularity contest based on the pesence of absence of my guide dog.  I go because I want service, and I use a guide dog.  They can jsut get over it, for all I care.  If they serve me with the nastiest attitude they can conjur up, more power to them as long as I am served.  



Vanessa Lowery, LGSW
Adult and Community Services Division
Adult Services Screening Unit
410-853-3550
VLowery at dhr.state.md.us


>>> "Pickrell, Rebecca M (TASC)" <REBECCA.PICKRELL at tasc.com> 7/30/2012 1:34 PM >>>
But it sounds like this woman wants the staff to like her. They don't for whatever reason when she's got the dog with her. Talking to them won't make them like her and it is the liking she wants. 
Many people leave their dogs home for Bible study. 
This really is no different. 


-----Original Message-----
From: nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Vanessa Lowery
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 1:02 PM
To: the National Association of Guide Dog Users' 'NAGDU Mailing List
Subject: Re: [nagdu] Diner Must Provide Access, Not Civility

If this is a service dog, and she needs to dog to perform certain tasks, what would be the logic in leaving the dog at home in order to go to the restaurant?  I wonder if there are some missing pieces to this story.  But I'm certainly not going to leave my dog at home just because the staff has a bee up ther (you fill in the blank) because they don't like me nor my dog.  They will serve me like they should any other customer, and if they don't, I would ahve a little chat with the Better Busines Bureau.



Vanessa Lowery, LGSW
Adult and Community Services Division
Adult Services Screening Unit
410-853-3550
VLowery at dhr.state.md.us 


>>> "Pickrell, Rebecca M (TASC)" <REBECCA.PICKRELL at tasc.com> 7/30/2012 
>>> 11:51 AM >>>
I wonder what would happen if she just went to the diner without her dog?
I'm also wondering how many people we're talking about. Four or five?? It hurts but isn't that many.
I also wonder what's going on, and wonder why if this places means so much to her she just doesn't go without the dog?

-----Original Message-----
From: nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Lyn Gwizdak
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2012 1:18 PM
To: NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users
Subject: Re: [nagdu] Diner Must Provide Access, Not Civility

Strange case.  I wonder what is...the rest of the story.  It is very odd that a place of business where everyone there - employees and customers alike - were friendly pre-dog and nasty post-dog.  It really makes no sense.
you might find one of two employees or a customer or two, but EVERYONE becoming nasty?

Are there anyone on this list who knows the place and might like to just go in and see what happens?

Lyn and Landon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ginger Kutsch" <GingerKutsch at yahoo.com>
To: "NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users"
<nagdu at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2012 9:09 AM
Subject: [nagdu] Diner Must Provide Access, Not Civility


> Diner Must Provide Access, Not Civility
>
> By ADAM KLASFELD
>
> Source: http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/07/27/48772.htm 
>
> MANHATTAN (CN) - A New York City diner did not discriminate against a 
> disabled woman who said that waiters gave her a cold shoulder once she 
> starting bringing a service dog into the restaurant, an appellate 
> court ruled.
>
>     Cheryl Krist, whose combination of asthma, arthritis and tremor 
> has hurt her mobility since 2003, bought the dog five years later to 
> cope with her symptoms.
>
>     At the time, she said, she had been a loyal customer of the 
> Coopertown Diner, owned by Michael Kolombos and his self-named 
> corporation, for nearly two decades.
>
>     "Coopertown, for Krist, had been 'like... Cheers... you went in 
> and you knew people and people knew you and you were friendly and 
> everything was fine,'" the appellate court summarized, quoting the 
> trial transcript.
>
>     But she said that "all went right out the window" after she 
> brought the dog, according to the court.
>
>     The 2nd Circuit decision, written by Judge Amalya Kearse and 
> co-signed by Judges Susan Carney and Clifford Wallace, outlines what 
> the undisputed trial evidence showed.
>
>     "The first time she took the dog to the restaurant, Joe Mugno, a 
> waiter with whom she frequently had had lunch, asked her if her dog 
> was a service dog, using a tone of skepticism. Krist responded that it 
> was a service dog, and she and Mugno had no further conversations 
> about the dog; but Mugno never had lunch with her again. Krist 
> testified that on this occasion, none of the other employees of the 
> restaurant spoke to her, even to exchange pleasantries. In addition, 
> one of the customers, who had sat with Krist every day she was at 
> Coopertown for 10 years, refused to sit with her, never sat with her 
> again, and stopped speaking to her.
>
>     "Krist also testified that there were incidents in which 
> [co-owners Fotios] Batas or Michael Kolombos 'yelled' at her. Thus, on 
> her second visit to Coopertown with the dog, a few days after the 
> first, Batas, from behind the counter on the opposite side of the 
> restaurant, stared at the dog and made growling sounds," the decision 
> states.
>
>     At one point, Krist and Batas quarreled about whether the dog barked.
> She claimed it made a "boof" sound, but he still ordered her to leave 
> the restaurant.
>
>     After more such incidents, Krist says she decided to stop going to 
> Coopertown in September 2009, and she filed a federal lawsuit seeking 
> punitive damages and an injunction.
>
>     U.S. District Judge George Daniels found after a three-day bench 
> trial that Krist showed "no evidence that any of these owners of this 
> restaurant or employees of this restaurant treated plaintiff any 
> differently because she was disabled.
>
>     "There is no evidence of that from the 20 years before she had the 
> dog, and there is no evidence of that when she got the dog," he 
> emphasized.
>
>     The judge added that the Americans with Disabilities Act was 
> intended to safeguard access, not friendliness.
>
>     "The ADA doesn't prohibit the conduct at issue here, complaining 
> about the dog's handling and the dog's behavior, even if done in a 
> rude and insensitive manner -if I could even characterize it as that," 
> Daniels wrote.
> "[That] is not what the ADA is intended to reach. This may have been 
> thought of like Cheers, but the ADA does not guarantee that kind of 
> atmosphere.
> The
> ADA prohibits discrimination and denial of use and enjoyment of public 
> facilities."
>
>     The three-judge panel agreed with this reading of the statute."We 
> reject Krist's contention that Title III imposes a civility code, and 
> we see no error in the findings or conclusion of the district court," 
> the decision states.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> HomeBack to Top
>
> Courthouse News ServicePrivacy Policy
>
> Search
>
> RSS
>
> About Us
>
> _______________________________________________
> nagdu mailing list
> nagdu at nfbnet.org 
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org 
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nagdu:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/linda.gwizdak%40cox 
> .net


_______________________________________________
nagdu mailing list
nagdu at nfbnet.org 
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org 
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/rebecca.pickrell%40tasc.com 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message and any attachments or files transmitted with it (collectively, the "Message") are intended only for the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary and/or prohibited from disclosure by law or contract. If you are not the intended recipient: (a) please do not read, copy or retransmit the Message; (b) permanently delete and/or destroy all electronic and hard copies of the Message; (c) notify us by return email; and (d) you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of the Message is strictly prohibited.

_______________________________________________
nagdu mailing list
nagdu at nfbnet.org 
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org 
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/vlowery%40dhr.state.md.us 

***************************************************************************************************
This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is proprietary, legally privileged and/or confidential. This Email is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this Email to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this Email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies. 
***************************************************************************************************

_______________________________________________
nagdu mailing list
nagdu at nfbnet.org 
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org 
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/vlowery%40dhr.state.md.us

***************************************************************************************************
This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is proprietary, legally privileged and/or confidential. This Email is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not an 
intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this Email to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this Email is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies. 
***************************************************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: Vanessa Lowery1.vcf
URL: <http://nfbnet.org/pipermail/nagdu_nfbnet.org/attachments/20120730/1249d1c7/attachment.ksh>


More information about the NAGDU mailing list