[nagdu] Guides at NFB training centers

Kaye Kipp kkipp123 at gmail.com
Mon Aug 31 14:52:23 UTC 2015


Okay.  Here's a thought.  I can see both sides of the issue, but when a
person chooses to, say, go to a university or college, one looks at the
curriculum and sees that there are certain courses one has to take in order
to graduate.  A person can choose not to go to that particular university if
one doesn't want to take those classes.  Is this any different?  I don't
think so.  I could decide not to go to and NFB center if I don't want to
leave my dog out of the mix.  Like I said, I see both sides.  

Kaye

-----Original Message-----
From: nagdu [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Marianne Denning
via nagdu
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 7:38 AM
To: NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users
Cc: Marianne Denning
Subject: Re: [nagdu] Guides at NFB training centers

I have had dogs for 25 years and have used a cane between dogs on 3
occasions.  I had to get to a bus, transfer buses downtown which involved
walking 2 or 3 blocks.  I was successful doing this.  I certainly believe my
cane skills could improve, as most of us can improve our cane skills.  I am
not willing to risk the possible retirement of my dog so I can obtain this
training.

At this time, my recommendation will be that anyone go through the center
training before obtaining a dog.  Unfortunately, that is not possible so
each person must decide if training is more important than the potential
need to go to school to obtain a new dog. This may be rare, but it does
happen.

On 8/31/15, larry d keeler via nagdu <nagdu at nfbnet.org> wrote:
> As do I! What I don't get is that yyou can't use the dog during other 
> classes! I could even live with occasionally leaving the dog for an 
> hour or two for mobility and cane practice. Like you, I have grown up
using a cane.
> I have only in the last 10 years have used the dog. If I can prove I 
> have good cane skills, then why should I have to not use my dog?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nagdu [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Elizabeth 
> Campbell via nagdu
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 8:21 AM
> To: 'NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users'
> Cc: Elizabeth Campbell
> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Guides at NFB training centers
>
> All, I cannot emphasize the importance of keeping up your cane skills 
> even though working with a dog is your preferred travel method.
> As you know, I had to retire my dog very suddenly, and believe me 
> there is a learning curve for me since I hadn't used my cane  as often 
> as I should, in my opinion.
>
> Having a good grounding in cane skills is essential for every blind 
> person given that life happens and you just never know when you will 
> be without your dog.
> I didn't attend an NFB training center, but I understand the rules and 
> philosophy and the emphasis on the blindness skills training.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nagdu [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Michael 
> Hingson via nagdu
> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2015 3:29 PM
> To: 'NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users'
> <nagdu at nfbnet.org>
> Cc: Michael Hingson <mike at michaelhingson.com>
> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Guides at NFB training centers
>
> All,
>
> I want to address comments by Lisa and Raven.
>
> First, the center staff asks students not to use guide dogs during 
> much of the training, including travel class, both in order to teach 
> cane travel and to provide lessons concerning orientation or what we 
> have come to know as "structured discovery". These concepts while 
> supposed to be known in part by guide dog users seem not to be 
> understood. I have seen many questions on this list which show 
> people's lack of confidence or a lack of knowledge of good orientation 
> skills.
>
> Even guide dog training programs do encourage their consumers to come 
> having attained good orientation skills as they recognize that they 
> cannot spend the month or less that students are in their programs 
> teaching orientation and mobility or adjustment. Leader Dogs has a 
> one-week, I believe that is the time, mobility course. That is not 
> nearly enough time to learn and develop good orientation skills in my 
> opinion. However, it is a start for some.
>
> The centers have a job to do. Using a guide dog during travel will not 
> promote the learning of good travel skills that are learned when 
> learning to use the most basic travel tool, the cane.
>
> Now let's move to items such as calling the centers "attitude factories".
> While that is not the term I would have coined that is what they are. 
> The purpose of the centers is to put together a program that not only 
> teaches consumers travel and other skills, but they teach attitudes 
> about blindness.
> Their most basic function is to help their attendees to understand 
> that blindness is NOT what holds them back. Remember that people come 
> to the centers usually not knowing much about being blind because they 
> have either never been exposed to good role models or they are newly 
> blinded. In both cases they, like the rest of us, have lived in a 
> world where people with eyesight constantly remind us, consciously or 
> not, that blind people cannot live as well or as productively as they. 
> Every person on this list can cite examples of this. Here is one I
observed last year.
>
> I was in a store with a relative. We just arrived at the checkout 
> counter where there was another customer in front of us. I was not 
> using Africa, but rather a cane. My cane hit the person in front of me 
> and I, because the line was close, also slightly bumped into the 
> person. While I immediately apologized my relative jerked me back and 
> later did not even recognized that I had interacted with the other 
> customer including apologizing. By the way, the customer said "no 
> problem". Even today the relative and his wife feel what he did was 
> right calling it "natural behavior". It is not "natural behavior", but 
> learned behavior due to poor attitudes about us. I have lived around 
> those people for many years and still today they are really 
> uncomfortable about blindness and me. They are also uncomfortable 
> around my wife, Karen, who is the actual blood relative.
>
> Centers teach many of us to have the confidence or yes, attitude, that 
> we are really part of society and that we can be whatever we want if 
> we can dream it. Most "orientation and mobility centers" in this 
> country and elsewhere do not focus on attitude as the NFB centers do. 
> So yes, our centers are in a way attitude factories and I am glad of it.
>
> I have not attended a center, but I worked for quite a while with Dr.
> Jernigan in the late 70s during the development of the original 
> Kurzweil Reading Machine. I spent much time at the Iowa Commission for 
> the blind observing and participating in some of the commission
activities. Dr.
> Jernigan used this time as part of my "training" in Federation 
> philosophy and in how he worked with employees and clients. That 
> training was invaluable to me and I keep it in mind and use it daily.
>
> I have spent time observing and working around our NFB training 
> centers and see not only the Jernigan influence, but how the processes 
> of the centers have evolved including how guide dogs are treated. I 
> for one do not believe anyone can develop a similar center based on 
> using a guide dog. The interactions are different. The whole process 
> would be different due to the nature of how a blind traveler and their 
> guide dog interact. The same level of learning environmental awareness 
> and "structured discovery" would not work. As the old adage goes "you 
> must learn to walk before you can learn to run". We can learn to run, 
> as it were, with guide dogs or canes, but learning to "walk" with a 
> guide dog, that is learning the basic orientation and travel skills, 
> will not happen with a guide dog as easily or as well, for the most 
> part, as with a cane. Even the guide dog training programs acknowledge it
so I think that debating it further is not productive.
>
> I hope this helps the discussion at hand. I would suggest that anyone 
> who disagrees with what the NFB training centers do should take the 
> time to contact the centers and learn about the programs. Don't take 
> my word for it.
> Don't take the word of anyone else as your only source of information. 
> Call or visit and then discuss.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
> Michael Hingson
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nagdu [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Lisa via 
> nagdu
> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2015 10:00 AM
> To: NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users 
> <nagdu at nfbnet.org>
> Cc: Lisa <dreamymarmot93 at yahoo.de>
> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Guides at NFB training centers
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have a question regarding the training centers.
> Why does the dog have to stay in an office while the student is in 
> class whereas it is totally normal to have the dog with you _in_ the 
> class room/office at school, college or university? Wouldn't we all be 
> very annoyed if a college had the policy of leaving the dog in the 
> headmaster's office during class?
> I'd just be interested in the difference that obviously exists between 
> learning at the center and at a mainstream school or work.
>
> Thanks for explanations.
> Lisa
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marianne Denning via nagdu" <nagdu at nfbnet.org>
> To: "NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users"
> <nagdu at nfbnet.org>
> Cc: "Marianne Denning" <marianne at denningweb.com>
> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2015 6:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [nagdu] Guides at NFB training centers
>
>
>> Julie, wwhere do you work?  Is the decision to let the person work 
>> with their dog based on each individual's progress through the 
>> program?
>>
>> On 8/30/15, Julie J. via nagdu <nagdu at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>>> Raven,
>>>
>>> A few thoughts...
>>>
>>> First I do not believe that guide dogs and canes are diametrically 
>>> opposed,
>>>
>>> as you previously asserted I said.  I believe they are different, 
>>> but that many of the skills are similar or overlapping.  I believe 
>>> that orientation skills are the much, much larger part of 
>>> orientation and mobility training.
>>>
>>> Folks learn to use a guide dog for mobility in less than a month.  I 
>>> also believe that you can learn to use a cane strictly for mobility 
>>> in that time.
>>>
>>> However the larger orientation skills take months and months to 
>>> learn and master.
>>>
>>> I've said before that it is preferable to learn orientation skills 
>>> while using a cane.  This is because it causes you to learn without 
>>> confusing a dog or inadvertently relying on input from the dog.
>>> Here's an example...early in O&M training here at our center, people 
>>> learn the skill of identifying where the door out of a room is, even 
>>> if they are the only
>>> person in the room.   This skill is the predecessor to more advanced
>>> skills
>>>
>>> like mall travel where you need to be able to recognize when you 
>>> pass a certain store or leave one area of the mall for another and 
>>> the like when there is no distinct doorway.  Here's the thing 
>>> though, if you are a dog user, even if you do not cue the dog to 
>>> find the door, it is going to be the
>>>
>>> obvious thing and they are going to suggest it.  The person may 
>>> never pick up on the subtle indications of where that door is.  They 
>>> don't learn that base skill to be able to build on it later and 
>>> perhaps later the dog doesn't
>>>
>>> know which way to go in the mall because there is no obvious choice.
>>> Because
>>>
>>> the person hasn't learned to recognize other clues in the 
>>> environment, they
>>>
>>> don't know how to direct the dog.
>>>
>>> Raven, you seem to have very good O&M skills.  For you it may make 
>>> little difference if you went through center training with a cane or 
>>> dog, but having worked at a center, I can absolutely tell you that 
>>> the huge majority
>>>
>>> of people are not like you.  They are attending the center training 
>>> because
>>>
>>> they need to better their skills, all of their skills.    We do have
>>> people
>>>
>>> attend our center with their guide dog.  Here they work their dog in 
>>> their free time, before and after classes and at the lunch break.  
>>> As the training
>>>
>>> progresses, the dog is incorporated into travel class and other times.
>>> By
>>> the very end of training, the person will be back to working the dog 
>>> the majority of the time.
>>>
>>> We all know that dogs get sick,  tragic things happen and eventually 
>>> the dog
>>>
>>> will need to retire.  For about 99.9% of us this means using a cane 
>>> when the
>>>
>>> dog is unavailable.   It's unrealistic to think that someone will be
>>> able
>
>>> to
>>>
>>> work their dog 100% of the time for the person's entire lifetime.   So
>>> if
>>> you don't have decent cane skills this means you are going to need a 
>>> human guide, put your life on hold or have two dogs at all times.
>>> Seems to me having learned to use a cane would be a good base skill 
>>> to have.
>>>
>>> I know that all of the programs have requirements about being able 
>>> to use
>
>>> a
>>>
>>> cane or show that you have good O&M skills.  But let's be brutally 
>>> honest with ourselves for a minute,  we all know that what passes 
>>> for good O&M skills varies widely from program to program.  I also 
>>> cannot begin to count
>>>
>>> the number of stories I have heard from people who attended a 
>>> program and had classmates who couldn't find their way around 
>>> without significant help.
>>>
>>> To me it's pretty clear that folks with guide dogs do not all have 
>>> good orientation skills.  Perhaps we could work with the guide dog 
>>> programs to help them better understand the importance of acquiring 
>>> good orientation training before getting a dog.
>>>
>>> You made the argument that a dog is your preferred mobility tool and 
>>> the center programs should support that decision.  I think they do, 
>>> but that they also recognize that a dog is a mobility tool and that 
>>> there is more to
>>>
>>> independent travel than mobility.    What if a person went to a center
>>> and
>>> said they use GPS, so they don't need to learn orientation skills?
>>> that would be silly and no one would think that a good idea.  GPS 
>>> only goes so far in getting you where you want to go.  It doesn't 
>>> tell you when it's safe
>>>
>>> to cross the street, when there are stairs, when there's road 
>>> construction or when a kid has parked his bike across the sidewalk.
>>> If someone went to a
>>>
>>> center and said they didn't need to learn to use the stovetop 
>>> because they were going to eat microwave dinners for the rest of 
>>> their life, no one would
>>>
>>> think that a good idea either.   The centers recognize that personal
>>> independence through skill training includes a wide variety of skills.
>>> It
>>> means moving out of your comfort zone and learning new things.
>>> Perhaps there are people who only use the microwave to cook, but the 
>>> point is that after center training that's a choice, not a necessity.
>>> To me that's what it's really about, having the choice to pick from 
>>> a wide variety of skills to find the one that best fits the 
>>> particular situation I find myself in.
>>>
>>> Julie
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nagdu mailing list
>>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
>>> for
>>> nagdu:
>>>
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/marianne%40denningw
> eb.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Marianne Denning, TVI, MA
>> Teacher of students who are blind or visually impaired
>> (513) 607-6053
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nagdu mailing list
>> nagdu at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> nagdu:
>>
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/dreamymarmot93%40ya
> hoo.de
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nagdu mailing list
> nagdu at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nagdu:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/mike%40michaelhings
> on.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nagdu mailing list
> nagdu at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nagdu:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/batescampbell%40gma
> il.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nagdu mailing list
> nagdu at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nagdu:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/lkeeler%40comcast.n
> et
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nagdu mailing list
> nagdu at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nagdu:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/marianne%40denningw
> eb.com
>


--
Marianne Denning, TVI, MA
Teacher of students who are blind or visually impaired
(513) 607-6053

_______________________________________________
nagdu mailing list
nagdu at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/kkipp123%40gmail.com





More information about the NAGDU mailing list