[nagdu] Due process

[Marianne Denning]

Tracy, I can certainly agree with that as long as there is a way to
protect the dog during the due process and the due process take place
immediately so the person isn't without the dog if the decision is in
the handler's favor.  I know, I am not asking for a lot.  Someone also
suggested the contract spell out the conditions under which the dog
would be removed. An arbitrary contract is hard to enforce.

On 7/16/15, Tracy Carcione via nagdu <nagdu at nfbnet.org> wrote:
> Someone suggested we come up with a resolution calling for due process when
> a dog is removed.  That seems like something most people could agree on.
>
> I'm not sure who the third party arbiter should be, but there should be
> some
> way for the person who's dog is being repossessed to state their case, and
> have it judged by an independent person.
>
> Tracy
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nagdu mailing list
> nagdu at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nagdu:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/marianne%40denningweb.com
>


-- 
Marianne Denning, TVI, MA
Teacher of students who are blind or visually impaired
(513) 607-6053