[Nfb-history] FW: [nfbcs] Programming with a Braille display

Mon Nov 14 13:23:33 UTC 2011

Hello List:

     There has been some discussion on the NFBCS list about Braille displays and programming. Below is a posting of historical interest. I also set out an earlier post. Hope all this makes sense.

Regards,

Robert

Robert Jaquiss
National Federation of the Blind 
200 East Wells Street at Jernigan Place
Baltimore, Maryland 21230 
Phone: 410-659-9314, ext. 2422

-----Original Message-----
From: nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Mike Freeman
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 11:34 PM
To: 'NFB in Computer Science Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [nfbcs] Programming with a Braille display

When I first began to write for computers -- first in FORTRAN and then in an
assembler -- I, too, did not have speech. We used punch cards for input (and
occasionally I used the console typewriter which was an IBM Selectric) and I
either had someone read my output or, later on, I and a couple of other guys
discovered that the console lights would make an FM radio make noises as
they operated and if you programmed right, you could get tones so we did
some more programming using typewriter interrupts as counters and got the
thing to send Morse code thru the radio and I got my output that way.

Those were the days.

I'm afraid, though, that I'm going to have to disappoint Tami by saying that
the cost of adaptive tech will never go down very much -- at least for
sophisticated adaptive tech such as screen-readers -- because there are too
few of us to really bring economies of scale to the creation process.

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf
Of Doug Lee
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 7:50 PM
To: NFB in Computer Science Mailing List
Subject: Re: [nfbcs] Programming with a Braille display

Wow. I had occasion to write machine code in hex without an assembler,
but at least I had speech. 1983, that was...

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 09:44:50PM -0600, David Andrews wrote:
Tami:

Most of us don't have a clue as to how far things have come.  Chuck
Hallenbeck told me that when he started using computers in the early
1970's, he first had to write an assembler program with out speech or
any kind of assistive technology, and once that was done, he had to
use the assembler to write a program to make the computer talk -- in
its crude way.

The first computer I saw, that was semi-accessible, had to be taught
how to pronounce each and every word, or it would spell.  Chuck and I
of course taught it how to say "beer."

Dave

At 08:52 AM 11/9/2011, you wrote:
>Heavens! No one can accuse you of not being dedicated.
>
>The more war stories I hear from those like you who did all the
>heavy duty ground breaking back in the day when assistive technology
>didn't really exist,, the more I realize how easy we have it now.
>The tech still lags, but it is there and gaining ground. The price
>of the really good stuff is still a barrier in the face of
>recalcitrant agencies and schools, but it is now possible for us
>non-print readers to compete much more fully with our sighted peers
>than even just a handful of years ago. There are more options
>available, too,. The cost barrier is still pretty daunting, but...
>Sooner or later that is going to have to change. The more students
>and professionals who push through those remaining barriers, the
>closer we come to freer access to those technical wonders we need to
>compete and excel and still have time left over to sleep now and
>then. /smile/ The dramatic increase in efficiency is a real
>difference-maker in the competitive arena. So, then, the greater
>competitiveness of every single individual who uses it in school and
>work and daily life will go a long way at chipping through those
>ridiculous low expectations people still insist on laying on us.
>Wider access to communications technology and social media will, I
>think, have a growing impact on the low expectations some accept
>from hearing them every time they attempt to get resources, too.
>Well, that is a hope of mine, anyway. /smile/
>
>Tami
>
>e
>
>On 11/08/2011 12:54 PM, Doug Lee wrote:
>>I have done programming via just speech for most of 20 years, but I
>>find Braille displays very helpful for a few tasks. Mostly, they speed
>>up the process of tracing indent levels, as has already been
>>mentioned.
>>
>>To be fair, I should say that perhaps the reason I use speech almost
>>to the exclusion of Braille is that, when I started out in
>>programming, it was my only realistic choice. I used to braille
>>program listings onto paper with Braille printers, but that's so much
>>slower than a modern Braille display even now. I seem to recall
>>spending a good afternoon Brailling out the entire TexTalker.blind
>>speech program in Assembly language on an Apple once, to the tune of
>>about 60 pages I think, using a Cranmer modified Perkins Brailler,
>>which probably put out less than seven lines a minute and required
>>manual loading of each page... but we're way past all that now.
>>
>>On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:35:38PM -0800, Tami Kinney wrote:
>>Aaron,
>>
>>I've been dragging my feet getting back into programming because I
>>haven't managed to get a braille display, and trying to get started
>>again using speech only makes me crazy. Also, Hearing code read to me
>>sounds like incomprehensible gibberish. I'm starting to just suck it
>>up and set aside time regularly to practice listening to code and path
>>names for linux config files or terminal commands, but... It's coming
>>slowly for me.
>>
>>My own queries around and about indicate that most professional
>>programmers find the 80-cell display to be their best option. My
>>former employer was prepared to purchase one for me when I was losing
>>the ability to read print, only we needed the VR agency to get someone
>>out for an onsite evaluation and more information about the technical
>>details, so... I hope they found someone good to do that job when I
>>had to give it up because I couldn't read and the agency still
>>couldn't get anyone out there. Sigh. The price of an 80-cell then, as
>>now, is around $10k.
>>
>>A 40-cell is around $5k, although I guess the Focus is only $4k these
>>days... There are rumors that prices will start to come down soon, so
>>I'm waiting for that with bated breath.
>>
>>You're the third person I've ever heard of who does programming with
>>speech only. /smile/ So I'm sure there must be others. You've bummed
>>me out because if other people can program with speech only, then I
>>don't have any excuse to put off learning to do that myself, do i?
>>/grin/
>>
>>I would say you're dead on about efficiency. I can only guess for
>>myself, but there do seem to be a lot of little tasks or bits of tasks
>>that involve squirrelling around with the screen reader that people
>>who use braille just read with their fingers... My assumptions on my
>>expectations for improved efficiency are also based on the simple fact
>>that even as a pretty new braille reader, I recall waht I read through
>>my fingers much more accurately and clearly than I do what I hear read
>>to me... I'm getting better due to experience but ... That's not
>>saying much. /smile/ Proofing is also more time consuming and also
>>fatiguing for me. That could be mostly just me and how I respond
>>conceptually to the spoken word as opposed to the read word... My
>>fingers do a much better job for me at replacing my eyeballs than do
>>my ears.
>>
>>I don't know if that is helpful, but I thought I would throw it out
>>since I'm in a similar place.
>>
>>I'm looking forward to hearing what everyone else has to say. /smile/
>>
>>Tami
>>
>>On 11/08/2011 06:46 AM, Aaron Cannon wrote:
>>>Hi all.
>>>
>>>I'm wondering how many programmers use a braille display?  I have been
>>>programming for the past several years, but I've never tried to use a
>>>braille display.  Do you feel that it makes you more efficient?  If
>>>so, how exactly?
>>>
>>>I assume the larger the display, the better?
>>>
>>>Any advice would be appreciated.  Anything I can do to make myself
>>>more efficient is great.
>>>
>>>Thanks.
>>>
>>>Aaron

_______________________________________________
nfbcs mailing list
nfbcs at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfbcs:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/dgl%40dlee.org

-- 
Doug Lee                 dgl at dlee.org                http://www.dlee.org
SSB BART Group           doug.lee at ssbbartgroup.com
http://www.ssbbartgroup.com
"Sometimes I think my learning curve is a circle." -- David Andrews

_______________________________________________
nfbcs mailing list
nfbcs at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfbcs:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40panix.com

_______________________________________________
nfbcs mailing list
nfbcs at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfbcs:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/rjaquiss%40nfb.org