[nfb-talk] Extra Tax Exemption
ckrugman at sbcglobal.net
ckrugman at sbcglobal.net
Mon Apr 26 05:52:06 UTC 2010
I would have to agree. I think that at times we spend too much time as blind
people trying to prove our independence when we need to just do what we need
to do. If it is more convenient and appropriate to use a convenience then do
it and let it be an individual choice. When I was in college I had single
dorm rooms because I took heavy course loads and did most of my studying
during the night as I worked two part time jobs and required much additional
storage space for tapes--reel to reel in those days. so it was more
convenient and less disruptive to other people.
Chuck
----- Original Message -----
From: "T. Joseph Carter" <carter.tjoseph at gmail.com>
To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Extra Tax Exemption
> My opinion, generally unasked-for though it may be, is that we worry
> sometimes far too much about what people might think if they see
> something.
>
> Over on the NABS list, someone asked about the notion that she might need
> a single dorm room for herself. The immediate response from the list was
> that she must at all costs refuse this on the grounds that she should not
> wish to be seen as needing something.
>
> How insecure in oneself must one be to constantly assume that something as
> simple as asking for more than half a shoebox as a living arrangement
> somehow connotes inferiority? I gave the most logical advice I could: If
> you want a roommate, do not allow the school to isolate you. If you
> don't, ask for a single. If someone asks if it's for your disability,
> answer honestly that it is simply your preference.
>
> Being a bit older than the average undergraduate, not a small person, and
> having more possessions than comfortably fit in half a shoebox, I greatly
> valued my single room. I paid for the privilege, as did half of the
> students on my floor. I did move eventually into a graduate student
> apartment, which required special approval, but the request was based on
> age and personality, not disability.
>
> Joseph
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:49:18PM -0700, ckrugman at sbcglobal.net wrote:
>>In my experience I have never heard or run across any negative feelings
>>about it on the part of society as a whole. The benefits of it for
>>idnividuals outweigh any alleged unproven detriments as a whole.
>>Chuck
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
More information about the nFB-Talk
mailing list