[nfb-talk] Check Out This Link On Rush Limbaugh talking about blind justice

[David Andrews]

Ryan:  I agree with you that we shouldn't "go after" Limbaugh.  He 
has a bigger megaphone than we do and we could never win.  Plus, it 
would play into his usual ploy of marginalizing anyone who disagrees 
with him, or with whom he doesn't agree with.  He just brands us nuts 
or something else.  While he may not have "attacked us" he did take a shot.

Times are tough all around and there is not much good will in the 
country right now.  Since we are few in numbers, and not important to 
most, we are a luxury most people feel they can't afford right 
now.  Limbaugh has always made fun of things we ask for and stand for 
because deep down he doesn't believe we deserve it -- we aren't as 
good or as worthwhile as him.

You will disagree, which is of course your right, but remember, like 
me, your interpretation of events is influenced by your political views.

Dave

At 05:10 AM 8/13/2010, you wrote:
>Dave, neither Rush nor the Republican party would acknowledge that 
>he is a spokesman for them. If he were, John McCain would not have 
>been the standard barer for us in 2008. Liberals often puff up this 
>idea in an attempt to drive a wedge between the conservative and 
>moderate factions of the party.
>
>I have to chuckle at the notion of the NFB "going after" Rush. If we 
>did, we would only look foolish and misdirected since we would be 
>picking a fight with a guy who didn't really attack us in the first 
>place. Should we then stir up resolutions condemning and deploring 
>every high-profile individual who made one comment that some might 
>find offensive? I think we have better things to do with our time.
>
>RyanO

                         David Andrews:  dandrews at visi.com
Follow me on Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/dandrews920