[nfb-talk] Check Out This Link On Rush Limbaughtalking aboutblind justice

[Dewey Bradley]

I said it before and I'll say it again.
look at the number of times he has been maried.
He has no room to talk.
I my self am a blind conservative republican.
So I of course agree with allot of what he talks about with politicks, but 
he gives our party a bad name.
Does he think that all blind people are libral or something.
That means that he is a hypocrite
Its called stereotyping.
But that is not the issue here.
I would try to call him, but he would just go on a tirade and just hang up 
on me.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "T. Joseph Carter" <carter.tjoseph at gmail.com>
To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Check Out This Link On Rush Limbaughtalking 
aboutblind justice


> Put simply, Mr. Limbaugh assumed that we have access to print books and 
> that the Kindle was an optional thing.  (He said the latter outright.)  He 
> doesn't know that we have had problems with required classes because those 
> classes use electronic components that are not accessible.  He assumes 
> things are hunky-dory and that we're rocking the boat.  You'd think he'd 
> have taken the time to know that wasn't true, since he's using it as an 
> example of the DOJ wasting its time.  Bad on him, I say.
>
> Then we have the question of it as an example.  I say it's an example of 
> the DOJ wasting its time because that's the only thing that makes sense. 
> Yes, Mr. Limbaugh, the DOJ has made it quite clear that they are not 
> concerned about racially-motivated voter intimidation, as long as the 
> intimidator is not white.  Yes, that makes them (not us) bigots.  However, 
> that does not make the DOJ's action wrong in this instance, since the law 
> requires that the universities do what they were not doing.
>
> No, I believe the man is wrong in this instance.  He has been before, and 
> will be again.  Because I doubt he has enough humility to ever admit to 
> being so, I do not see it as worth our while to try and correct his 
> reasoning.  (I define "our" here in both th sense of the NFB and "our" 
> being blind conservatives who think he was being an idiot here...)
>
> I don't think I've got much more to say on the subject.
>
> Joseph
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:21:02PM -0500, Dewey Bradley wrote:
>>Even though he has a point about the Black panthers, I don't see what it 
>>would have anything to do with the NFB.
>>He is so full of him self that all that money he makes from his show, he 
>>still will charge you to listen to it on line, The guy can't even keep a 
>>marriage, how many times has he been married, 7 times I think.
>>So he has no room to go on a tirade on anyone.
>>besides the fact that he doesn't even have his facts correct on this.
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org