[nfb-talk] Check Out This Link On Rush Limbaughtalkingaboutblind justice

Dewey Bradley dewey.bradley at att.net
Sat Aug 14 23:56:10 UTC 2010


What I tell people is that blind people are just like everyone else, some 
are black, gay, women, from a different country, like different kinds of 
music, some drink beer like me, some smoke, and some do not.
I have gotten from the general public that all blind people are all pot 
heads, not true at all.
I don't nor have never, but some do, just like everyone else.
To put a group in the same cadegory is wrong.
We live in a country where we are free to have our opinions.
one of my best friends is a flaming libral, I am a prolife conservative 
republican I love that man.
To say that blind people are libral morons is like saying that because of 
your skin color, you have to act like what everyone expects you to acct.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ray Foret Jr" <rforetjr at comcast.net>
To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Check Out This Link On Rush 
Limbaughtalkingaboutblind justice


> So much for trying to be reasonable huh?  I reckon that not only he, but 
> too many others think that all blind people are liberal.  Well, I don't 
> have anything against blind liberals myself; that's their right; but, hey, 
> we have a right to be heard too.  I still say we should make some noise 
> about this.  And, in fact, so we have.  But, you know as well as I do what 
> the consequence would be if any of us tried to phone his show now don't 
> we?  Why of course we do.  I think we might make a better case with 
> O'Riley or someone.  But, that's all the thought I'll give that one.
>
>
> Sincerely,
> The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!
>
> A Very Proud and Happy Mac User!!!
>
> E-Mail:
> rforetjr at comcast dot net
> Skype Name:
> barefootedray
>
> On Aug 14, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Dewey Bradley wrote:
>
>> I said it before and I'll say it again.
>> look at the number of times he has been maried.
>> He has no room to talk.
>> I my self am a blind conservative republican.
>> So I of course agree with allot of what he talks about with politicks, 
>> but he gives our party a bad name.
>> Does he think that all blind people are libral or something.
>> That means that he is a hypocrite
>> Its called stereotyping.
>> But that is not the issue here.
>> I would try to call him, but he would just go on a tirade and just hang 
>> up on me.
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "T. Joseph Carter" 
>> <carter.tjoseph at gmail.com>
>> To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 4:35 PM
>> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Check Out This Link On Rush Limbaughtalking 
>> aboutblind justice
>>
>>
>>> Put simply, Mr. Limbaugh assumed that we have access to print books and 
>>> that the Kindle was an optional thing.  (He said the latter outright.) 
>>> He doesn't know that we have had problems with required classes because 
>>> those classes use electronic components that are not accessible.  He 
>>> assumes things are hunky-dory and that we're rocking the boat.  You'd 
>>> think he'd have taken the time to know that wasn't true, since he's 
>>> using it as an example of the DOJ wasting its time.  Bad on him, I say.
>>>
>>> Then we have the question of it as an example.  I say it's an example of 
>>> the DOJ wasting its time because that's the only thing that makes sense. 
>>> Yes, Mr. Limbaugh, the DOJ has made it quite clear that they are not 
>>> concerned about racially-motivated voter intimidation, as long as the 
>>> intimidator is not white.  Yes, that makes them (not us) bigots. 
>>> However, that does not make the DOJ's action wrong in this instance, 
>>> since the law requires that the universities do what they were not 
>>> doing.
>>>
>>> No, I believe the man is wrong in this instance.  He has been before, 
>>> and will be again.  Because I doubt he has enough humility to ever admit 
>>> to being so, I do not see it as worth our while to try and correct his 
>>> reasoning.  (I define "our" here in both th sense of the NFB and "our" 
>>> being blind conservatives who think he was being an idiot here...)
>>>
>>> I don't think I've got much more to say on the subject.
>>>
>>> Joseph
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:21:02PM -0500, Dewey Bradley wrote:
>>>> Even though he has a point about the Black panthers, I don't see what 
>>>> it would have anything to do with the NFB.
>>>> He is so full of him self that all that money he makes from his show, 
>>>> he still will charge you to listen to it on line, The guy can't even 
>>>> keep a marriage, how many times has he been married, 7 times I think.
>>>> So he has no room to go on a tirade on anyone.
>>>> besides the fact that he doesn't even have his facts correct on this.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nfb-talk mailing list
>>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nfb-talk mailing list
>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org 





More information about the nFB-Talk mailing list