[nfb-talk] Check Out This Link On Rush Limbaughtalkingaboutblind justice

Sarah Baughn sarahb006 at comcast.net
Wed Aug 18 17:45:16 UTC 2010


I don't think OReilly would be insensitive enough to make such statements.
Sarah
If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this 
mountain: "Remove hence to yonder place.", and it shall remove, and nothing 
shall be impossible unto you.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ray Foret Jr" <rforetjr at comcast.net>
To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Check Out This Link On Rush 
Limbaughtalkingaboutblind justice


> So much for trying to be reasonable huh?  I reckon that not only he, but 
> too many others think that all blind people are liberal.  Well, I don't 
> have anything against blind liberals myself; that's their right; but, hey, 
> we have a right to be heard too.  I still say we should make some noise 
> about this.  And, in fact, so we have.  But, you know as well as I do what 
> the consequence would be if any of us tried to phone his show now don't 
> we?  Why of course we do.  I think we might make a better case with 
> O'Riley or someone.  But, that's all the thought I'll give that one.
>
>
> Sincerely,
> The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!
>
> A Very Proud and Happy Mac User!!!
>
> E-Mail:
> rforetjr at comcast dot net
> Skype Name:
> barefootedray
>
> On Aug 14, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Dewey Bradley wrote:
>
>> I said it before and I'll say it again.
>> look at the number of times he has been maried.
>> He has no room to talk.
>> I my self am a blind conservative republican.
>> So I of course agree with allot of what he talks about with politicks, 
>> but he gives our party a bad name.
>> Does he think that all blind people are libral or something.
>> That means that he is a hypocrite
>> Its called stereotyping.
>> But that is not the issue here.
>> I would try to call him, but he would just go on a tirade and just hang 
>> up on me.
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "T. Joseph Carter" 
>> <carter.tjoseph at gmail.com>
>> To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 4:35 PM
>> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Check Out This Link On Rush Limbaughtalking 
>> aboutblind justice
>>
>>
>>> Put simply, Mr. Limbaugh assumed that we have access to print books and 
>>> that the Kindle was an optional thing.  (He said the latter outright.) 
>>> He doesn't know that we have had problems with required classes because 
>>> those classes use electronic components that are not accessible.  He 
>>> assumes things are hunky-dory and that we're rocking the boat.  You'd 
>>> think he'd have taken the time to know that wasn't true, since he's 
>>> using it as an example of the DOJ wasting its time.  Bad on him, I say.
>>>
>>> Then we have the question of it as an example.  I say it's an example of 
>>> the DOJ wasting its time because that's the only thing that makes sense. 
>>> Yes, Mr. Limbaugh, the DOJ has made it quite clear that they are not 
>>> concerned about racially-motivated voter intimidation, as long as the 
>>> intimidator is not white.  Yes, that makes them (not us) bigots. 
>>> However, that does not make the DOJ's action wrong in this instance, 
>>> since the law requires that the universities do what they were not 
>>> doing.
>>>
>>> No, I believe the man is wrong in this instance.  He has been before, 
>>> and will be again.  Because I doubt he has enough humility to ever admit 
>>> to being so, I do not see it as worth our while to try and correct his 
>>> reasoning.  (I define "our" here in both th sense of the NFB and "our" 
>>> being blind conservatives who think he was being an idiot here...)
>>>
>>> I don't think I've got much more to say on the subject.
>>>
>>> Joseph
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:21:02PM -0500, Dewey Bradley wrote:
>>>> Even though he has a point about the Black panthers, I don't see what 
>>>> it would have anything to do with the NFB.
>>>> He is so full of him self that all that money he makes from his show, 
>>>> he still will charge you to listen to it on line, The guy can't even 
>>>> keep a marriage, how many times has he been married, 7 times I think.
>>>> So he has no room to go on a tirade on anyone.
>>>> besides the fact that he doesn't even have his facts correct on this.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nfb-talk mailing list
>>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nfb-talk mailing list
>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org 





More information about the nFB-Talk mailing list