[Nfb-web] cell phones - Mad as Harry
David Andrews
dandrews at visi.com
Mon Oct 12 23:44:20 UTC 2009
This thread is off topic for this list, but yes, it is true.
Of course the "where readily achievable" is the gotcha!
Dave
At 12:24 PM 10/12/2009, you wrote:
>Is this still true?
>"The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has rules requiring
>telecommunications manufacturers and service providers to make their
>products and services accessible to people with disabilities, if
>readily achievable. These rules implement Section 255 of the
>Communications Act. Where it is not readily achievable to provide
>access, Section 255 requires manufacturers and providers to make
>their devices and services compatible with peripheral devices and
>specialized customer premises equipment that are commonly used by
>people with disabilities, if such compatibility is readily achievable."
>The technology is here. Humbly, I think cell phones through most
>any carrier WITH screen readers are indeed readily acheivable and
>would cause no undue burden. A good time for measured and
>coordinated action on cell phones? Anyone offering free advice to
>the group on proceeding most effectively?
>Robin Switzer Brunner
>CompuPlace Director
>601 Second Ave SE #3
>Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401-1305
>319-362-4284
>compuplace at ecc-cr.net
>www.ecc-cr.net
More information about the NFB-Web
mailing list