[nfbcs] [nabs-l] Basic Questions About Mac versus Pc

Joe Orozco jsorozco at gmail.com
Mon May 10 00:10:35 UTC 2010


Hi Steve,

I am the only PC user in our operation.  Two disadvantages that come to mind
is that the office-wide calendars for the various departments do not play
well with my Outlook.  Also, they have a program called (Transmit?) which
makes exchanging documents via our public shared drive a lot easier than my
sluggish way of opening FlashFXP, uploading, downloading, etc.  I tell you
it's tempting, but if tomorrow I lose my job I also wonder if the overhaul
would have been worth it.  I have no reason to believe I'd lose my job mind
you, but in today's economy nothing outside the government sector seems
certain and Apple machines are more expensive than their PC counterparts.
Decisions, decisions.

Joe

"Hard work spotlights the character of people: some turn up their sleeves,
some turn up their noses, and some don't turn up at all."--Sam Ewing 

-----Original Message-----
From: nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org 
[mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Steve Jacobson
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2010 12:15 AM
To: NFBnet NFBCS Mailing List
Subject: Re: [nfbcs] [nabs-l] Basic Questions About Mac versus Pc

Joe,

I am not a MAC user, at least not at this point, but I 
definitely am one who takes it seriously.  In the end, though, I think 
there is much to be gained by remaining as consistent as you 
can be with your co-workers in terms of the platform you 
use.  Clearly, if your workers use Windows and one of the major 
apps they use is not very accessible and the MAC 
version of the same app is much more accessible, you should 
give it a very good look.  If your co-workers are using 
MACS and the apps they use seem to be pretty accessible, it 
would seem worth going with a MAC unles you found the 
same apps were much more accessible on a Windows machine.  
However, going it alone on the job with either platform 
puts you at a disadvantage.

I am still not convinced, although I am more than willing to 
listen, that it is worth going with a MAC if your job site makes 
heavy use of Microsoft Office, particularly if you will also be 
authoring or modifying documents.  I know that Open Office 
can handle Microsoft Office files, but if things get 
complicated, there are just always oddities that come to the 
surface.  I 
just experienced that very thing with a document my daughter 
wrote in Open Office on the MAC and saved in Word 
format.  Something when wrong with the formatting in a big way. 
 Was there a cause and could it have been corrected 
in general, 
probably, but it took time and would have taken more time to 
investigate than we had just then.  Again, if you were to 
establish that your productivity was much better with Open 
Office in this particular example, it may overcome the 
potential pitfalls, but you again run a risk of not having the 
support of your jobs IT or help desk staff.  This example could 
be turned around, too, meaning that using Microsoft Office if 
your employer uses MACs and Open Office is also probably 
not a good idea if you find Open Office to work pretty well for 
you.  In most cases here, we're talking about document 
compatibility with other co-workers.  TextEdit on the MAC is 
far more than a text editor and is a decent word processor 
and it is free and very good for most personal use.  Some 
compare it with WordPad, but I believe that is not really a fair 
comparison, it has more power.  I just think that consistency 
with your co-workers has to be a major consideration, 
whichever platform they use, as long as the apps being used are 
accessible.

Best regards,

Steve Jacobson

>On May 8, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Joe Orozco wrote:

>> Hello all,
>> 
>> I keep hearing about all these wonderful things about Macs.  
I was very
>> interested in the iPad review on Access World, and my 
employer's offer to
>> switch out my PC for a Mac just gets more tempting by the 
moment.  Still, as
>> I get older I am less tolerant of drastic changes to my 
office assembly, and
>> yet, temptations abound.
>> 
>> 1. In the most recent platform upgrade, how has the 
accessibility changed in
>> terms of the screen reader?  Is the screen reader only 
updated with system
>> upgrades, or are there ever updates between major upgrades?  
If you had to
>> compare Voiceover to JAWS, how does their functionality 
break down?  I know
>> it's not fair to compare one to the other because the logic is a bit
>> different, but I'm hoping you can speak to the level of 
manipulation you
>> have over the applications in your computer.
>> 
>> 2. How has the compatibility changed in terms of Macs and 
software packages?
>> I originally hesitated, because it seemed the industry was 
more prone to be
>> compatible with PC products.
>> 
>> 3. How easy is it to control documents in the word 
processor?  Do Macs use
>> their own version of MS Office, or is there a native word 
processor that
>> makes Office documents readable?
>> 
>> 4. What can you tell us about their e-mail client?  Outlook 
has its quirks
>> but is almost 100 percent accessible.  Sunbird, by contrast, 
would be great
>> but in my opinion still had some accessibility shortcomings. 
 I'm wondering
>> if the same is true of iCal and Mac-based applications?
>> 
>> 5. How much freedom do you have with Macs to go outside of 
iTunes?  I don't
>> much care for proprietary packages unless it's unavoidable.
>> 
>> 6. Are hardware repairs truly limited to Apple stores?
>> 
>> I know the best thing is to play around with Macs yourself.  
I intend to do
>> that when I visit our home office in California in a month, 
but I'm hoping
>> those of you who are daily users of the system can give up-to-date
>> information since reviews can quickly become outdated.  And, 
I'm sure that
>> even playing with a Mac for an hour or so would not truly 
give me a sense of
>> how well they meet my daily task expectations.
>> 
>> Thanks for any information and/or website recommendations.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Joe
>> 
>> "Hard work spotlights the character of people: some turn up 
their sleeves,
>> some turn up their noses, and some don't turn up at all."--Sam Ewing
>> 
>> 
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of 
virus signature
>> database 5096 (20100507) __________
>> 
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>> 
>> http://www.eset.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> nabs-l mailing list
>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account 
info for nabs-l:
>> 
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/clinton.
waterbury%40gmail.com


>_______________________________________________
>nfbcs mailing list
>nfbcs at nfbnet.org
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account 
info for nfbcs:
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/steve.ja
cobson%40visi.com








_______________________________________________
nfbcs mailing list
nfbcs at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account 
info for nfbcs:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/jsorozco%
40gmail.com
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of 
virus signature database 5098 (20100509) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5098 (20100509) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 





More information about the NFBCS mailing list