[nfbcs] jaws so sensitive is BS!

[Nicole Torcolini]

Hahaha.

-----Original Message-----
From: nfbcs [mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Cannon via
nfbcs
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 3:12 PM
To: NFB in Computer Science Mailing List
Cc: Aaron Cannon
Subject: Re: [nfbcs] jaws so sensitive is BS!

Small clarification. The current version of Jaws is Jaws 2018. The previous
version was Jaws 18. It can be confusing, but I have a theory for why they
opted to do this. If you do a search for Jaws 19, you will get plenty of
results, but none related to the application under discussion. So, my
theory, which is based on absolutely no evidence, and probably isn't true,
is that it was done, at least in part, due to SEO and discoverability.
Thanks Back to the Future II.

Aaron

--
This message was sent from a mobile device


> On Dec 29, 2017, at 14:16, b.schulz--- via nfbcs <nfbcs at nfbnet.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I wasn't looking for illegal hacks for the authorization scheme.
> I just haven't messed with hardware for a while and was irritated with 
> burning a key every time I insert a 2.5 inch drive into the cage.
> I was told this could possibly be fixed by also updating that machine 
> to the current jfw18.
> Thanks,
> Bryan
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nfbcs [mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Gary Wunder 
> via nfbcs
> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2017 12:47 PM
> To: 'NFB in Computer Science Mailing List' <nfbcs at nfbnet.org>
> Cc: Gary Wunder <GWunder at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: [nfbcs] jaws so sensitive is BS!
> 
> When I first started using JAWS for Windows, a user had a fixed number 
> of authorizations and they came on a 3 1/2 inch disk. When you ran 
> out, things were tough. I cannot for the life of me see how the 
> current process is burdensome. If I go to FSACTIVATE, I can request 
> that my authorization count be reset. This seems eminently fair and
reasonable.
> 
> As much as I detest the need to endure any protection scheme, I know 
> people who are very proud of the fact that they have versions of JAWS 
> that have been given to them by others. Although I have never 
> investigated it, some people tell me that they have hacked versions of 
> JAWS in which the authorization scheme is disabled. His Jaws 
> expensive? I consider it so, but I appreciate its support, its 
> training materials, and people I can actually talk with when I have a 
> problem. I made a living as a programmer for more than thirty years, 
> and whether people value the cost of intellectual property or not, I know
that I needed to be paid for my work.
> 
> Do I have NVDA on my system? I certainly do. Am I glad that it exists? 
> Yes I am, and I vote not only by using it but by making contributions. 
> But as an editor I can't find all of the functions that now serve me 
> well in my use of JAWS for Windows, so I will continue to support a 
> for-profit company while at the same time being open to other 
> alternatives and encouraging them as well.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfbcs mailing list
> nfbcs at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nfbcs:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/b.schulz%40sbcgloba
> l.net
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfbcs mailing list
> nfbcs at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nfbcs:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/cannona%40fireantpr
> oductions.com

_______________________________________________
nfbcs mailing list
nfbcs at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfbcs:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/ntorcolini%40wavecable.co
m