[NFBCS] Mastodon accessibility problems
David Andrews
dandrews920 at comcast.net
Mon Jun 5 02:40:57 UTC 2023
The client is separate from the server you join.
I signed up with mastodon.social earlier. They
have a HCAPTCHA thing going. It is accessible,
and if you follow the steps -- it worked for me.
Once you have an account somewhere you can use
any client you like, or the server's web site.
Dave
At 06:37 PM 6/4/2023, Sabra Ewing via NFBCS wrote:
>A few comments art respectability politics ish.
>what servers did you all join then and what did
>you do? I don't want to get used to a client
>only to have accessibility get broken. Leaving
>Facebook sounds great if there were a better
>alternative. Sabra Ewing > On Jun 4, 2023, at
>4:06 PM, Mike Gorse via NFBCS <nfbcs at nfbnet.org>
>wrote: > > Last I saw, the NFB isn't planning
>to set up a server for members to use, although
>it sounded like they would consider doing so if
>enough people are interested. Also, as an update
>on what I posted last night, I am able to set an
>accessibility cookie on the hcaptcha site that
>mastodon.social is using and bypass their
>captcha if I use Edge, but not when I use
>Firefox. Now I've tried on both Linux and
>Windows, so I'm guessing it isn't specific to my
>system. I've emailed their support. > >
>-Mike > >> On Sun, 4 Jun 2023, Christopher
>Chaltain via NFBCS wrote: >> >> Since Mastodon
>supports an open programming interface, there
>are a lot of Mastodon clients in the App Store,
>Play Store, and so on Some of those are
>accessible and some are not. Just as whenever
>you have multiple clients in the App Store that
>do the same thing, you'll find some of the more
>efficient to use than others. I can't recall all
>of the Mastodon clients I've tried, but I know I
>settled on Tusker as the client that I prefer,
>and as I said, I find this client more efficient
>for me than using either the Twitter client of
>the Facebook client. I'm kind of taking a
>holiday from social media at the moment, but
>before I went on this holiday, I was more active
>in Mastodon than any other social networking
>platform just because I found it so much more
>efficient. >> >> I can't follow the rest of your
>post, but if you don't bring this to the
>attention of a site administrator then they may
>never know there's an issue to address. I didn't
>have any trouble signing up on a Mastodon server
>myself. Also, no one is forcing anyone to use
>Mastodon, so if you have problems with the
>platform or a particular server then you don't
>need to sign up. You might just wait until the
>NFB sets up a server. Like I said, I'm sure
>it'll be accessible. >> >> -- >> Christopher
>(AKA CJ) =>÷ >> Chaltain at Outlook, USA >> >>
>-----Original Message----- >> From: Sabra Ewing
><sabra1023 at gmail.com> >> Sent: Sunday, June 4,
>2023 1:43 PM >> To: NFB in Computer Science
>Mailing List <nfbcs at nfbnet.org> >> Cc:
>Christopher Chaltain <chaltain at outlook.com> >>
>Subject: Re: [NFBCS] Mastodon accessibility
>problems >> >> What do you mean the right
>client? Also, I'm not sure I'm interested in
>speaking to an administrator who puts other
>protected classes in their rules but not ablism,
>and who mentions accessibility while creating a
>high barrier of entry for disabled people. They
>can't even provide an audio one, even though
>that would not be accessible to deaf blind
>people. It could at least be accessible to more
>people. I bet they ban disabled people from
>accessing their server more often then they get
>rid of robots. >> >> Sabra Ewing >> >>>> On Jun
>3, 2023, at 7:21 PM, Christopher Chaltain via
>NFBCS <nfbcs at nfbnet.org> wrote: >>> >>> I
>signed up on a different Mastodon server a while
>ago, and it was a breeze. I'm not sure if
>anything has changed in the Mastodon software or
>the administrator of that particular server put
>something in place, but the Mastodon community
>is very conscientious when it comes to
>accessibility. I'm fairly certain that the
>administrator of the server you're trying to
>sign up on will be very helpful. If not, there
>are other servers to choose from. If the NFB is
>setting up it's own Mastodon server then I'm
>sure it'll be accessible. >>> >>> Since Mastodon
>is open source with an open API, it's possible
>to find some very accessible clients. I found
>Mastodon to be just as accessible as Twitter or
>Facebook and a lot more efficient to use as a
>blind person, once you find the right client you
>prefer. >>> >>> -- >>> Christopher (AKA CJ)
>=>÷ >>> Chaltain at Outlook, USA >>> >>>
>-----Original Message----- >>> From: NFBCS
><nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org> On Behalf Of Mike
>Gorse via >>> NFBCS >>> Sent: Saturday, June 3,
>2023 7:59 PM >>> To: Sabra Ewing via NFBCS
><nfbcs at nfbnet.org> >>> Cc: Mike Gorse
><mike at straddlethebox.org> >>> Subject: Re:
>[NFBCS] Mastodon accessibility problems >>> >>>
>I just tried signing up on mastodon.social using
>firefox and also had trouble with the CAPTCHA.
>There is a link to hcaptcha.com that is supposed
>to allow you to get a cookie, but I haven't been
>able to get that to work so far. The first time
>I signed in and used the button to set a cookie,
>I think that it told me that the cookie was set,
>but I still got a challenge when I went back to
>mastodon.social. I tried again to set a cookie,
>and the site told me that it could not set a
>cookie and to email their support if it
>continued to happen. So I think I'll try again
>later and email their support if I still have
>trouble. But I'm curious if other people have
>had success with it. >>> >>> Signing up on a
>different Mastodon server might be another
>option. >>> >>> -Mike >>> >>>> On Sat, 3 Jun
>2023, Sabra Ewing via NFBCS wrote: >>>> >>>>
>Before you say this is off-topic, there isn't
>really a list or category where this can fit
>neatly. >>>> >>>> The Nfb has said they are
>going to focus on Mastodon instead of Twitter
>because Twitter fired their entire accessibility
>team from what I understand. However, mastodon
>is also not accessible. I was trying to create
>an account and it had a caption with no audio
>caption, and it said I would be able to skip
>past it if I have an accessibility cookie, and I
>was using voice over but it did not scared me
>past it. I was trying to join the social server
>and I'm not sure if things would be different if
>the Nfb has its own server and I tried to join
>that one. For the one I joined it was saying
>they will not tolerate attacks against a number
>of protected classes, but disabled people were
>not listed. >>>> >>>> I mean, I don't know
>Facebook has an accessibility team either, but
>they have just broken accessibility on
>messenger, and it is not accessible to create an
>event. And their support menu is not accessible,
>probably because the accessibility on messenger
>is broken.' >>>> >>>> Again, the only reason I'm
>asking is because the Nfb specifically is using
>Mastodon now. >>>> >>>> Sabra Ewing >>>>
More information about the NFBCS
mailing list