[nfbmi-talk] Fw: official request for information and accommodation
joe harcz Comcast
joeharcz at comcast.net
Thu Sep 2 18:38:51 UTC 2010
----- Original Message -----
From: joe harcz Comcast
To: Farmer, Mel (DELEG)
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: official request for information and accommodation
Mr. Farmer:
This from Section 504 regulations is only a partial response. Please read them very, very carefully.
Sincerely,
Paul Joseph Harcz, Jr.
§ 104.4 Discrimination prohibited.
(a) General. No qualified handicapped person shall, on the
basis of handicap, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of,
or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activitiy which
receives Federal financial assistance.
(b) Discriminatory actions prohibited. (1) A recipient, in
providing any aid, benefit, or service, may not, directly or through
contractual, licensing, or other arrangements, on the basis of handicap:
(i) Deny a qualified handicapped person the opportunity to
participate in or benefit from the aid, benefit, or service;
(ii) Afford a qualified handicapped person an opportunity to
participate in or benefit from the aid, benefit, or service that is not equal to
that afforded others;
(iii) Provide a qualified handicapped person with an aid,
benefit, or service that is not as effective as that provided to others;
(iv) Provide different or separate aid, benefits, or services
to handicapped persons or to any class of handicapped persons unless such action
is necessary to provide qualified handicapped persons with aid, benefits, or
services that are as effective as those provided to others;
(v) Aid or perpetuate discrimination against a qualified
handicapped person by providing significant assistance to an agency,
organization, or person that discriminates on the basis of handicap in providing
any aid, benefit, or service to beneficiaries of the recipients program or
activity;
(vi) Deny a qualified handicapped person the opportunity to
participate as a member of planning or advisory boards; or
(vii) Otherwise limit a qualified handicapped person in the
enjoyment of any right, privilege, advantage, or opportunity enjoyed by others
receiving an aid, benefit, or service.
(2) For purposes of this part, aids, benefits, and services,
to be equally effective, are not required to produce the identical result or
level of achievement for handicapped and nonhandicapped persons, but must afford
handicapped persons equal opportunity to obtain the same result, to gain the
same benefit, or to reach the same level of achievement, in the most integrated
setting appropriate to the person's needs.
(3) Despite the existence of separate or different aid,
benefits, or services provided in accordance with this part, a recipient may not
deny a qualified handicapped person the opportunity to participate in such aid,
benefits, or services that are not separate or different.
(4) A recipient may not, directly or through contractual or
other arrangements, utilize criteria or methods of administration (i) that have
the effect of subjecting qualified handicapped persons to discrimination on the
basis of handicap, (ii) that have the purpose or effect of defeating or
substantially impairing accomplishment of the objectives of the recipient's
program or activity with respect to handicapped persons, or (iii) that
perpetuate the discrimination of another recipient if both recipients are
subject to common administrative control or are agencies of the same State.
(5) In determining the site or location of a facility, an
applicant for assistance or a recipient may not make selections (i) that have
the effect of excluding handicapped persons from, denying them the benefits of,
or otherwise subjecting them to discrimination under any program or activity
that receives Federal financial assistance or (ii) that have the purpose or
effect of defeating or substantially impairing the accomplishment of the
objectives of the program or activity with respect to handicapped persons.
(6) As used in this section, the aid, benefit, or service
provided under a program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance
includes any aid, benefit, or service provided in or through a facility that has
been constructed, expanded, altered, leased or rented, or otherwise acquired, in
whole or in part, with Federal financial assistance.
(c) Aid, benefits or services limited by Federal law. The
exclusion of nonhandicapped persons from aid, benefits, or services limited by
Federal statute or executive order to handicapped persons or the exclusion of a
specific class of handicapped persons from aid, benefits, or services limited by
Federal statute or executive order to a different class of handicapped persons
----- Original Message -----
From: Farmer, Mel (DELEG)
To: joe harcz Comcast
Cc: Cannon, Patrick (DELEG) ; Wyeth, Duncan (DELEG) ; Haynes, Carla (DELEG) ; Jurus, Janet (DELEG)
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 11:54 AM
Subject: RE: official request for information and accommodation
Mr. Harcz, Section 11-7000 Equally effective communication of the ADA Title II Technical
Assistance Manual reads as follows;
"A public entity must ensure that its communications with individuals with disabilities are as
effective as communications with others. This obligation, however, does not require a public
entity to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the
nature of its services, programs, or activities, or in undue financial and administrative burdens."
The Department is treating your August 26, 2010 request for copies of public records under the
Michigan Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) the same as it treats similar requests from other
requesters. Thusly, based on the above ADA guideline, the Department is in compliance with all
applicable federal and state FOIA, and related provisions regarding requests for public records;
and not, as asserted in your September 1, 2010 emails, illegally discriminating against you in
processing this and other requests for nonexempt public records in it's possession.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: joe harcz Comcast [mailto:joeharcz at comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5:25 PM
To: Farmer, Mel (DELEG)
Subject: Re: official request for information and accommodation
August 26, 2010
Dear Mr. Farmer,
Those documents were in the hands of the MCB commissioners, Cheryl Heibeck of MCB, parties from Deleg, Patrick Cannon, Constance Zanger at the budget and cash match meeting held in the Victor Office Building August 26, 2010.
Moreover, I did not make this request under FOIA, but rather through relevant provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and relevant sections of both title Iand V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. As you might be aware federal law, especially civil rights laws such as the ADA and Rehabilitation Act trump state law.
Sincerely,
Paul Joseph Harcz, Jr.
----- Original Message -----
From: Farmer, Mel (DELEG)
To: joe harcz Comcast
Cc: Cannon, Patrick (DELEG) ; Wyeth, Duncan (DELEG) ; Haynes, Carla (DELEG) ; Jurus, Janet (DELEG)
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4:54 PM
Subject: RE: official request for information and accommodation
Mr. Harcz, this notice is in response to your request for copies of records/information described in the attached copy of your August 26, 2010 email to Mr. Duncan Wyeth. Please be informed that the Department of Energy, Labor, & Economic Growth (DELEG) is processing this request under the Michigan Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), MCL 15.231 et seq.
In order to determine the existence of any nonexempt records/information within the DELEG that might be responsive to your request, a search and examination of records/information must be undertaken. For this reason, it is necessary, as permitted by MCL 15.235, Section 5(2)(d) of the FOIA, to extend the time for response to September 17, 2010, or sooner.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: joe harcz Comcast [mailto:joeharcz at comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 7:12 PM
To: Wyeth, Duncan (DELEG)
Cc: Cannon, Patrick (DELEG); Luzenski, Sue (DELEG); Jo Anne Pilarski MCB, Chair; Margaret Wolfe MCB, Commissioner; John Scott MCB, Commissioner; Geri. Taeckens MCB, Commissioner; mike.cox at michigan.gov; Lynnae Ruttledge RSA Commissioner; John L Wodatch USDOJ; TOM MASSEAU MPAS; president.nfb.mi at gmail.com; Joe Sibley MCBVI Pres.; Richard Clay Advocates f/t Blind; nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org
Subject: official request for information and accommodation
Official Request for Public Documents Including Financial Information
August 26, 2010
Paul Joseph Harcz, Jr.
1365 E. Mt. Morris Rd.
Mt. Morris, MI 48458
E-mail: joeharcz at comcast.net
Re: request for information pursuant to ADA, Title II
Duncan Wyeth, DELEG ADA Coordinator
Via e-mail
Patrick D. Cannon, Director Michigan Commission for the Blind
And State of Michigan ADA Coordinator
Via e-mail
MCB Commissioners (all via e-mail)
Jo anne Pilarski, Chair
Michael Geno, Vice-Chair c/o Susan Luzinski
Margaret Wolfe, Commissioner
Geraldine Taeckens, Commissioner
John Scott, Commissioner
All,
I am writing you today in the interest of accommodation, inclusion, and transparency for all of the following items in accessible format pursuant to obligations under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1993 (Title II, subpart e, communications), as well as relevant provisions of The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended.
The documents may simply be sent to me via e-mail as either Word attachments or plain text enclosures.
I reiterate my request for all information in the "commissioner's packet" reference today at the meeting on budget and cash match. Ms. Luzinski only sent me the MCB Report, Agenda and Draft College Policy. But documents related to the State Plan which the commissioners clearly have and other documents they will be priey to tomorrow at the board meeting were not sent to me. Thus again I wish to have all documents that the commissioners have concerning tomorrow's quarterly meeting sent to me.
Moreover, as discussed today I wish to have all of the documents related to the in service sent to me. They include in part:
-all the reports that Ms. Cheryl Heibeck referred to including the 911 report, standards and indicators, the most recent Auditor General's report (single audit) and so on and so forth
-the operating budget that Ms. Zanger referred to
-all of the memorandums of understanding referred to with Intermediate School Districts, by Mr. Jones
-the financial report referenced by the person from DELEG (Al was his first name but I couldn't hear his last or official position
-the memorandum of understanding referred to at today's in service
I must say that Mr. Cannon denoted that these documents were to be made available to members of the public and that he reiterated his contention that MCB was open and wished to be more open than other agencies in the country. I take him at his word on this and am taking him up on his offer of open governance in these regards now.
Finally, I reiterate my verbal suggestion today that these and other documents relative to the activities of the Michigan Commission for the Blind are routinely, in a timely and accessible manner simply posted to MCB's web site now and in the future.
Respectfully,
Paul Joseph Harcz, Jr.
Cc: MI National Federation of the Blind
Cc: Michigan Council of the Blind and Visually Impaired
Cc: Advocates for the Blind
Cc: U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Disability Rights Section
Cc: Michael Cox, Michigan Attorney General
Cc: Michigan Protection and Advocacy Services, Inc.
Cc: Lynnae Rutledge, Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration
More information about the NFBMI-Talk
mailing list