[nfbmi-talk] from july 13 bsbp meeting
joe harcz Comcast
joeharcz at comcast.net
Wed Nov 13 16:12:11 UTC 2013
Since when can the speaker void a mandated facility?
11 MR. EAGLE: My name is Mark Eagle. I wanted to
12 highlight a concern that I've noticed a trend since the last
13 18 months that's going on in the BEP. There has been four
14 different temporary locations that have been mis properly
15 labeled. People have said that there's no blind qualified
16 people to take over the Port Huron, the Secretary of State,
17 the Anderson Building and the Capitol when there was people in
18 the Lansing area that have been qualified and have been
19 temporary operators in high profile locations like this Mason
20 Building, the Supreme Court, the Victor Building. So this
21 concern is constantly going on where people are saying that
22 there's not an administration when there is multiple potential
23 operators that I can name off, but I'm not going to name
24 names. And this brings me to the idea that managing is -- I'm
25 trying to think of the word. Sorry. I'll go onto my next
1 idea. But that's my major concern right now.
2 MR. RODGERS: In response to the comment about
3 the four facilities that Mark's aware of that there may be
4 temporary operators, two of those facilities we have no
5 control over, that's the Capitol Building and the Anderson
6 Building. The Anderson Building facility was closed by an act
7 of the Speaker of the House of Representatives. So Pat Cannon
8 had no choice. He couldn't keep that stand open. We were
9 simply booted out. That's a fact of life that we have to live
10 with, and that was December 2011.
11 And we have been working with the Legislature
12 to get that facility back open. The Capitol Building was a
13 similar situation where we had an emergency situation, and we
14 had to negotiate with the Legislature in order to get the
15 Capitol Building stand running for the summer. And this was
16 not a matter of choice necessarily by us, but one of
17 practicality. And if we wanted to have somebody at the
18 Capitol Building, we had to go along with some of the wishes
19 of the Legislature. As to the Port Huron facility, and I
20 can't remember what the third one -- what the fourth one was.
21 Constance, would you address those other two, as to why we
22 have temporary operators there.
23 MR. ZANGER: We also had a situation at the
24 Secretary of State where we had to, on very short notice,
25 remove an operator. We do have a temporary blind operator in
1 that facility. The Port Huron vending route we also -- the
2 operator resigned on very short notice. The facility was
3 terribly degraded. It was very dirty, the equipment was in
4 disrepair, and there was no inventory.
5 MR. RODGERS: And as I recall, Constance, in
6 order to get somebody in Port Huron we had agreed to a limited
7 contract, correct?
8 MS. ZANGER: We did indeed.
9 MR. RODGERS: We had to negotiate a contract.
10 The Commission should be aware of that. And we couldn't just
11 say to somebody, we want you to do this, but we're going to
12 do, you know, like a 30 day lease or a 10 day lease or we're
13 liable to yank you out as soon as we get somebody. I mean no
14 business is going to want to go in there and help us out under
15 those kind of unreasonable terms. So we did have to negotiate
16 a contract, and that contract is still running, Constance, is
17 that correct?
18 MS. ZANGER: That's correct. And that entity
19 came into that facility, repaired all the machines, brought
20 them back into service, cleaned them, and stocked them at
21 their own expense. There was no expense to the Bureau of
22 Services for Blind Persons for that.
23 MR. SIBLEY: If I could follow up with a
More information about the NFBMI-Talk
mailing list