[nfbmi-talk] Proposed Mailing List Policy

[joe harcz Comcast]

>From notes on ADA, Title II regulations here sir:
section 503 of the ADA, which prohibits retaliation against any individual 
who exercises his or her rights under the Act. This

section is unchanged from the proposed rule. Paragraph (a) of {35.134 
provides that no private or public entity shall discriminate against any 
individual

because that individual has exercised his or her right to oppose any act or 
practice made unlawful by this part, or because that individual made a 
charge,

testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, 
proceeding, or hearing under the Act or this part.



Paragraph (b) provides that no private or public entity shall coerce, 
intimidate, threaten, or interfere with any individual in the exercise of 
his or her

rights under this part or because that individual aided or encouraged any 
other individual in the exercise or enjoyment of any right granted or 
protected

by the Act or this part.



This section protects not only individuals who allege a violation of the Act 
or this part, but also any individuals who support or assist them. This 
section

applies to all investigations or proceedings initiated under the Act or this 
part without regard to the ultimate resolution of the underlying 
allegations.

Because this section prohibits any act of retaliation or coercion in 
response to an individual's effort to exercise rights established by the Act 
and this

part (or to support the efforts of another individual), the section applies 
not only to public entities subject to this part, but also to persons acting

in an individual capacity or to private entities. For example, it would be a 
violation of the Act and this part for a private individual to harass or 
intimidate

an individual with a disability in an effort to prevent that individual from 
attending a concert in a State-owned park. It would, likewise, be a 
violation

of the Act and this part for a private entity to take adverse action against 
an employee who appeared as a witness on behalf of an individual who sought

to enforce the Act.


(Now my comments):

Here J.J. you are trying to get NFB MI to sanction me and my investigations 
of, and documentation of chronic, pervasive and malicious acts of 
discrimination by BSBP and other Title II entities in remitting accessable 
information in a timely manner.

Moreover you are trying to get a Title III entity (NFB MI) to engage in such 
retaliation as documented upon this very list.

Have a nice day sir.

Joe
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J.J. Meddaugh" <jj at bestmidi.com>
To: "NFB of Michigan Internet Mailing List" <nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: [nfbmi-talk] Proposed Mailing List Policy


> Joe,
> Did the board of the NFB of Michigan authorize you to submit these FOIA 
> requests on behalf of the organization? That is my only question.
> Thanks.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfbmi-talk mailing list
> nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> nfbmi-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org/joeharcz%40comcast.net