[nfbmi-talk] Fw: Fw: Automatic reply: more anderson questions petrilli

[joe harcz Comcast]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "joe harcz Comcast" <joeharcz at comcast.net>
To: "Nadia Cioffi" <nadiaacioffi at gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 11:26 PM
Subject: Re: [nfbmi-talk] Fw: Automatic reply: more anderson questions 
petrilli


> Connections are these:
>
> 1. The scoundrels at BSBP misappropriate all and every dime meant for and 
> paid for by the taxpayer to rehabilitate the blind in to pockets of 
> abusers of the blind.
> 2. They, including the highly paid for public "pimp" and I cannot think of 
> a better nor accurate term than "pimp", Ed Rodgers has sold each and 
> everyone of us out in demonstrable form to the proto-fascist state 
> apparatchik called the federally funded but unaccountable state of 
> Michigan.
>
> 3. Highly paid "pimps" for this same fascist state (and you might know 
> fascism as it is a product of Italy) pick their own rats within this self 
> same system to steal programs, funds, benefits and so forth from programs 
> for the blind for their own self-interests and for their corporate pals. 
> Re: Mussolini's model for fascist Italy. Look it up in English or Italian.
>
>
> 4. "Fascist" pimps have something to sell to the unwashed masses.
>
> 5. Can anyone figure out just what it is these scoundrels are trying to 
> sell us all? I can and refer to other segments.
>
> 6. If one looks at the public record and even the obfiscations of the 
> public record it shows simply that funds dedicated by the taxpayer are not 
> only not accountable, and not accessable or transparent, but again are 
> diverted and exploited to favor not only a few chosen ones but sighted and 
> non-disabled hacks who make theives look good, as theives at least have 
> the common decency to say they are robbing us outright and don't have 
> publicly paid pimps to say, "We're not robbing you. I mean trust us for 
> crying out loud. We wouldn't steal from you we are here to help you and 
> that is our story and we're sticking to it. Besides just who are you to 
> believe while we steal outrightand publicly from you and everyone; you or 
> your lying eyes?"
>
> 7. I can and have identified it. It is B.S. to Blind persons.
>
> Which is to say it is all about selling Bovine Scatology to Blind Persons 
> and marketing it to the general public and reselling it at the retail 
> market and calling it well a good thing full of Vitamin A, B, C and all 
> that while being full of poison, and the impurities of utter bovine 
> scatology.
>
> 8. Perhaps this will make the system here understandable: The BSBP is 
> nothing short of a protection racket and a racketeering device for the 
> abuse of federal and taxpayer's funds and the BEP is nothing short of a 
> pure protection racket ... It is al sort of Mafiosi like don't you think 
> though these Mafiosi are just stupid clowns who prey upon people who are 
> most vulnerable bing blind like the pigs they are.
>
> Say how does one spell "to understand" in Italian Nadia? Is it capuche?
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Nadia Cioffi" <nadiaacioffi at gmail.com>
> To: "joe harcz Comcast" <joeharcz at comcast.net>; "NFB of Michigan Internet 
> Mailing List" <nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 10:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [nfbmi-talk] Fw: Automatic reply: more anderson questions 
> petrilli
>
>
> Although I see vcild points: postings that Ed is out office twice shows 
> what? That Ed is not entitled to be away from office, that Ed is not 
> working? If anything it shows he human. People have meetings, and time 
> off. My question is primly dose if make a difference is not when a message 
> is posted in a, twice or three times. Last I understood posting something 
> once is informal, posting twice within a few minutes was a mistake, 
> posting twice thought a few days maybe a reminder and any more send to say 
> "look at what I wrote"  also it can be insulting to the reader. If you say 
> something to someone I'm person more than a few times its annoying and 
> same applies to written text. So because you posted this twice I assume 
> what reader to notice, what would be? Assuming that a person will connect 
> the dots turns into misunderstanding. To prevent misunderstanding, what is 
> the point of this post, informal or to point something out. What are you 
> trying to inform or point out that I must have missed  because I do not 
> see a connection? I assume you posted this because there is a connection.
>
> On Jun 6, 2014 , at 8:24 PM, joe harcz Comcast via nfbmi-talk 
> <nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Zanger, Connie (LARA)
> To: joe harcz Comcast
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 8:21 PM
> Subject: Automatic reply: more anderson questions petrilli
>
>
> I am out of the office until Monday, June 9, 2014.  In my absence if you 
> need assistance, you may contact James Hull at 517/373.2064 or at 
> hullj at michigan.gov.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfbmi-talk mailing list
> nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> nfbmi-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org/nadiaacioffi%40gmail.com