[nfbmi-talk] nfb referenced here

Wed Jun 25 15:08:07 UTC 2014

Hi,

These companies want to pander to us when it is in their interest.  However,
when we need true access there is no one to talk to.

Warm Regards,

Fred

-----Original Message-----
From: nfbmi-talk [mailto:nfbmi-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of joe
harcz Comcast via nfbmi-talk
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 10:51 AM
To: nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org
Subject: [nfbmi-talk] nfb referenced here

Verizon Says It Wants to Kill Net Neutrality to Help Blind, Deaf and
Disabled People

June 13, 2014

by Erika Eichelberger

Verizon sign (AP)

This post originally appeared at

Mother Jones.

Verizon lobbyists are canvassing Capitol Hill with a curious new argument
against net neutrality - it hurts disabled people.

The odd pitch comes as the Obama administration is mulling a plan to scrap
net neutrality -the idea that Internet service providers should treat all
websites

equally - and instead allow ISPs to create Internet "fast lanes" for
companies that can afford to pay for speedier service. The proposal, which
is under

consideration by the Federal Communications Commission, has sparked a

massive

public

outcry,

including an "

Occupy the FCC

" protest and a

letter

signed by 150 tech companies, including Google, Amazon, and Netflix,
opposing the plan.

Three Hill sources tell Mother Jones that Verizon lobbyists have cited the
needs of blind, deaf, and disabled people to try to convince congressional
staffers

and their bosses to get on board with the fast lane idea. But groups
representing disabled Americans, including the National Association of the
Deaf, the

National Federation of the Blind, and the American Association of People
with Disabilities are not advocating for this plan. Mark Perriello, the
president

and CEO of the AAPD, says that this is the "first time" he has heard "these
specific talking points."

There's no doubt that blind and deaf people, who use

special online services

to communicate, need access to zippy Internet. Similarly,

smartphone-based medical devices

that are popular with disabled people require fast Internet service. Telecom
industry lobbyists have argued that, without a fast lane, disabled Americans

could get stuck with subpar service as Internet traffic increases. AAPD's
Perriello says this rationale could be genuine but seems "convenient."

A spokesman for Verizon wouldn't confirm that Verizon lobbyists have used
the disabled access pitch, but he says the company's position on the FCC's
proposal

is "not disingenuous."

Defenders of net neutrality are more cynical. The Verizon lobbyists'
argument is "disingenuous," says Matt Wood, a policy director at Free Press,
an Internet

freedom advocacy group. The FCC says that even if the agency doesn't go
through with its fast lane proposal, companies that serve disabled people
would

still be able to pay internet service providers for faster service.

A spokesman for Verizon wouldn't confirm that Verizon lobbyists have used
the disabled access pitch, but he says the company's position on the FCC's
proposal

is "not disingenuous." (Verizon has not taken a public stance on the FCC's
proposed fast lane rule.) An FCC spokesman says the agency is evaluating the

industry's disability argument.

The roots of the net neutrality fight go back more than a decade. In 2002,
the George W Bush-era FCC decided to

classify

the internet as an "information service" instead of a public utility,

protecting

internet services from the stringent regulations that land line phones fall
under. For

years,

free Internet advocates urged the FCC to reclassify the internet, but the
commission resisted.

Last month, the FCC dealt a major blow to net neutrality by

proposing new rules

that would allow Internet service providers to charge online content
providers such as Facebook and Netflix higher rates for faster service. The
move caused

a national outcry. Last week, the FCC's website

crashed

after comedian John Oliver urged Internet "trolls" to comment at the
agency's website. In response to public ire, the FCC

has said it will reconsider

classifying the Internet as a common utility.

The telecom industry is striving to ensure that the agency doesn't do that.
In 2014 alone, Internet service providers have spent close to $19 million
lobbying

on net neutrality, according to Senate lobbying records:

The Sprint to Influence Net Neutrality (MotherJones graphic)

Overall,

ISP lobbying has exploded

over the past decade:

ISPs Dominate FCC Lobbying (MotherJones graphic)

This is not the first time the industry has cited the needs of disabled
people as it sought to influence FCC rules. Verizon made this argument five
years

ago when the commission was drafting new regulations for ISPs. In a 2009
speech, former Verizon Communications CEO

Ivan Seidenberg said

that if his company was not allowed to prioritize certain medical data over
internet traffic like email and spam, then people with health conditions
might

not benefit from life-saving technological advances.

The decision the FCC makes in the coming months could "change the course of
the Internet for a long time to come," says Michael Copps, who served as an

FCC commissioner from 2001 to 2011, "perhaps in ways that will be impossible
to reverse."

erika80x95_0

Erika Eichelberger is a reporter in the Mother Jones Washington, DC, bureau.
She has also written for The Nation, The Brooklyn Rail and TomDispatch.

Source:

http://billmoyers.com/2014/06/13/verizon-says-it-wants-to-kill-net-neutralit
y-to-help-blind-deaf-and-disabled-people/
_______________________________________________
nfbmi-talk mailing list
nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nfbmi-talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org/f.wurtzel%40att.net