[Nfbmo] FW: Requesting VETO SB 188
deweyspr at mediacombb.net
Tue Apr 19 21:32:23 UTC 2011
What does this bill do?
is it one of these union things that everyone is griping about?, I have not
read this bill, how does it hurt workers?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Wunder" <gwunder at earthlink.net>
To: "'nfbmo list'" <nfbmo at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 4:08 PM
Subject: [Nfbmo] FW: Requesting VETO SB 188
> From: Amy Coopman [mailto:acoopman at fwpclaw.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 2:05 PM
> To: Shelia Wright (E-mail); 'Gary Wunder' (E-mail)
> Subject: Requesting VETO SB 188
> I am very troubled to report that the Missouri House and Senate have
> SB 188, a bill that seriously hurts Missouri employees. The bill was sent
> to the Governor on April 18, 2011. It is critical that Governor Nixon
> this bill so that it does not become the law of Missouri.
> My colleagues and I in the Kansas City and St. Louis chapters of the
> National Employment Lawyers Association, along with other coalition
> partners, are reaching out to organizations throughout Missouri to enlist
> their assistance in opposing this bill's attempt to strip Missouri workers
> of their hard-fought and longstanding employment rights.
> I am hoping that you will contact your organization members, supporters
> colleagues to urge them to contact Governor Nixon to ask him to VETO SB
> Why is SB 188 bad for Missouri?
> * It severely limit the rights of employees mistreated in the
> workplace because of their disability, race, sex, religion, etc.
> * It undermine the "whistleblower" protections for employees who
> report suspected criminal or fraudulent conduct by their employer;
> * It would make it much easier for non-Missouri corporations to force
> Missouri employees to pursue their claims in federal courts (sometimes far
> from their homes or workplaces) before Washington-appointed federal judges
> who are not accountable to Missouri citizens like state court judges are;
> * The bill eliminates personal responsibility and accountability for
> the individuals who engage in employment discrimination or harassment, or
> who retaliate against those who oppose or resist such unlawful conduct.
> This bill has strong support from businesses in Missouri. Contrary to the
> bill sponsor's claim, these bills do not simply "conform" Missouri law to
> federal law, nor "mirror" the protections of the federal Civil Rights Act.
> In many instances, SB 188 treats offending corporations much more
> - especially out of state corporations, and they treat affected employees
> much more harshly, than the federal law does. Moreover, these measures
> actually roll back protections that exist under the current Missouri Human
> Rights Act and decisions of the Missouri Supreme Court.
> SB 188 is on the Governor's desk and time is running short. We therefore
> ask you to alert your membership to this issue and urge them to write,
> e-mail or telephone Governor Nixon immediately and insist that he veto
> Please contact Governor Nixon and tell him why SB 188 is bad for Missouri.
> Governor Jay Nixon
> P.O. Box 720
> Jefferson City, MO 65102
> Phone: (573) 751-3222
> Fax: (573)751-1495
> Email: <http://governor.mo.gov/contact/>
> Please feel free to contact me with questions about the bill. I sincerely
> appreciate your help.
> Amy Coopman
> Foland, Wickens, Eisfelder,
> Roper & Hofer, P.C.
> 911 Main Street Suite 3000
> Kansas City, MO 64105
> (816)460-2887 Direct Dial
> (816) 472-6262 Facsimile
> acoopman at fwpclaw.com
> Foland, Wickens, Eisfelder, Roper & Hofer, P.C. intends this e-mail, and
> attachment(s) thereto, only for the preview and use of the addressee(s)
> named therein for the outlined purpose. Such may contain confidential
> privileged information. If you are not the intended, listed recipient(s),
> this listing constitutes notice that any dissemination, distribution,
> forwarding, or copying of its contents, including any attachment(s), is
> strictly prohibited. Please immediately advise me of the error by return
> e-mail or via telephone at (816) 472-7474 and immediately delete the
> original and/or any printed cop(ies) without reading or forwarding the
> to others. If you do not notify the sender, and if you are the intended
> recipient and accept the content without advising that you do not wish to
> receive such information in this manner, then you accept the risk of any
> breach of confidentiality and/or the risk of interception without
> Further, the Missouri Supreme Court and the Missouri Bar Disciplinary
> Counsel require Missouri's practicing attorneys to notify recipients of
> e-mail correspondence that 1) it is not secure, 2) any e-mail
> sent to/by you may be exposed to multiple computers/users in transit, 3)
> interception during transport by improper access may occur. This notice
> e-mail correspondence is approved per your prior consent. Please advise
> immediately regarding any preference change. Thank you.
> REQUIRED IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: Any advice expressed as to tax matters
> was neither written nor intended to be used, and cannot be used, by any
> taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under
> U.S. tax law or for the purpose of complying with IRS Circular 230.
> Disclaimer added by CodeTwo Exchange Rules
> Nfbmo mailing list
> Nfbmo at nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
More information about the NFBMO