[Nfbmo] constitution question

[Debbie Wunder]

I believe that conduct  could come from a chapter on up the line to the 
state board, and then even possibly to the national board.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gene Coulter" <escoulter at centurytel.net>
To: "NFB of Missouri Mailing List" <nfbmo at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Nfbmo] constitution question


> The President will correct me if I am incorrect I am sure.
> We have no formal Parlimentarian. On questions of the constitution  I am
> generally consulted as for parlimentary issues themselves  the State
> President or whomever is presiding would make Parlimentary rulings.
> Conduct unbecoming of a Federationist would be decided by the Board of
> Directors  between Conventions with the person being being accused having
> the opportunity to appeal at the convention. If the charge is made at the
> convention the convention would rule.
> Gene
>
> From: Bryan Schulz
> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 5:49 PM
> To: nfbmo at nfbnet.org
> Subject: [Nfbmo] constitution question
>
> hi,
>
> Out of curiosity, who is the parliamentarian of the affiliate and who
> defines what "actions detrimental to the organization" or "conduct
> unbecoming to a member of the Federation" mean?
>
> Bryan Schulz
> _______________________________________________
> Nfbmo mailing list
> Nfbmo at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmo_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> Nfbmo:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmo_nfbnet.org/escoulter%40centurytel.net
> _______________________________________________
> Nfbmo mailing list
> Nfbmo at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmo_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> Nfbmo:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmo_nfbnet.org/debbiewunder%40centurytel.net
>