[stylist] Next Telephone Meeting date

[Robert Newman]

Okay folks, the next telephone conference will be on Sunday November 9th at
7:30 Central US (8:30 Eastern, 6:30 Mountain, 5:30 Pacific) 

The phone number you dial is-  (218) 339-4300 (This will cost you your
regular long distance charges.)

Once in, you are asked   for your Access Code and it is: 568839# 

See you all there! 

(there will be other notices between now and then.)

Thanks

Robert Leslie Newman 
Email- newmanrl at cox.net
THOUGHT PROVOKER Website- 
Http://www.thoughtprovoker.info

-----Original Message-----
From: stylist-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:stylist-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
Behalf Of helene ryles
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 6:22 PM
To: NFBnet Writer's Division Mailing List
Subject: Re: [stylist] sample of work rewritten. 3rd attempt.

Thanks for everyone's comments. I don't mind people commenting or correcting
my grammar but I would also like some feed back on what you actually think
of the work as well.

The grammar isn't intentional. Or for affect. It's just because neither my
spelling or my grammar is perfect. While I have a spell check to help me
with the spelling, the computer doesn't correct grammatical errors quite so
well.

One thought though. At the moment work is not on it's final draft and may be
altered if need be. It might be a good idea if general quality was discussed
first. When I've reached my final draft grammar can be gone over again.
Otherwise you might have to end up having to keep correcting grammar.

While it's good to have good grammar in one's work it shouldn't be the main
thing. Originality and getting the readers attention is more important.
That's what I need to know right now. But thanks for reading my work anyway.

Helene

On 27/10/2008, James Canaday M.A.  N6YR <n6yr at sunflower.com> wrote:
> not always.  sometimes redundancies serve to emphasize, or are 
> necessary for flow in a particular passage.
> jc
>
> Jim Canaday M.A.
> Lawrence, KS
>
> At 01:00 PM 10/27/2008, you wrote:
>>Our language has lots of redundancies.   Good writers will spot and
>> eliminate
>>them.
>>Lori
>>In a message dated 10/26/08 11:29:14 PM, f.wurtzel at comcast.net writes:
>>
>>
>> > Hi Jim,
>> >
>> > I agree it is common and, in my opinion, redundant.  Many people 
>> > also say "refer back" or "remand back" which are
>> clearly bad usage by virtue of their
>> > redundancy.  I feel "exact same" falls into the same category.
>> >
>> > Warm Regards,
>> >
>> > Fred
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>**************
>>Play online games for FREE at Games.com! All of your favorites, no 
>>registration required and great graphics ­ check it out!
>>(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1211202682x1200689022/aol?red
>>ir=
>>http://www.games.com?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001)
>>_______________________________________________
>>stylist mailing list
>>stylist at nfbnet.org
>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/stylist_nfbnet.org
>>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> stylist:
>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/stylist_nfbnet.org/n6yr%40sunflo
>>wer.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> stylist mailing list
> stylist at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/stylist_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> stylist:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/stylist_nfbnet.org/dreamavdb%40g
> ooglemail.com
>

_______________________________________________
stylist mailing list
stylist at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/stylist_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
stylist:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/stylist_nfbnet.org/newmanrl%40cox.net