[stylist] stylist Digest, Vol 81, Issue 17
Donna Hill
penatwork at epix.net
Tue Jan 11 00:11:24 UTC 2011
Kerry, Bridget and all,
I want to throw out a third possibility in the transitional narration
vs white space debate. How about a little of both? When I was writing my
novel, there were many occasions when I did not want to start a new
chapter, but time had passed between paragraphs. I felt that, even
though it was clearly indicated in the first sentence of the next
paragraph that we were no longer in writing class or that a week had
gone by, I didn't feel like it was enough, so in went an extra line
break. I don't do it all the time, but when the scene is drastically
different or the amount of time that has passed seems to indicate a
pause, I like the white space.
I must say that in Bridget's piece, I was reading line by line, and
there were so many blank lines after every paragraph that I didn't
notice that there was actually more white space at the transition in
question. I don't know what happens when we copy things into our
e-mails, but I have had cause to wonder before about extra line breaks
being inserted by the electronic demons.
Donna
Read Donna's articles on
Suite 101:
www.suite101.com/profile.cfm/donna_hill
Ezine Articles:
http://ezinearticles.com/?expert=D._W._Hill
American Chronicle:
www.americanchronicle.com/authors/view/3885
Connect with Donna on
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/dewhill
LinkedIn:
www.linkedin.com/in/dwh99
FaceBook:
www.facebook.com/donna.w.hill.
Hear clips from "The Last Straw" at:
cdbaby.com/cd/donnahill
Apple I-Tunes
phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewAlbum?playListId=259244374
Check out the "Sound in Sight" CD project
Donna is Head of Media Relations for the nonprofit
Performing Arts Division of the National Federation of the Blind:
www.padnfb.org
On 1/10/2011 6:41 PM, Kerry Thompson wrote:
> Bridgit,
>
> Style is very much an individual thing. It seems to me, though, that
> to some extent too, it is generational or at least goes in cycles, not
> to say fads. As far as I can tell, white space rather than actual,
> written transitions, came into widespread use only in the last thirty
> to thirty-five years or so. Sure, I use it occasionally, but being a
> conservative old fogy, I tend to look for more, hmmm, organic
> transitions. As you say, it's purely a matter of style.
>
> I still think, though, that white space needs to be handled with care.
> Unless you actually print out the piece yourself, you have no way of
> knowing how or whether the mail reader or web browser or fax machine
> you send the manuscript to will render it as you intend. And, how can
> you be sure, when your piece is published, that your white space will
> fall just where you intend? What if it falls at the end of a page? The
> reader won't even know it's supposed to be there. I guess all I'm
> saying is, white space is in fashion just now, but it hasn't always
> been and won't always be. As with any fashion, you need to approach it
> with caution and employ it with moderation.
>
> From a purely writerly point of view, I personally prefer written
> transitions. It goes back to clarity, I guess. The tried and true,
> "Meanwhile, back at the ranch..." type transition leaves no doubt in
> the reader's mind that a transition is coming. You can gussy it up a
> bit, integrating it into the narration like this:
>
> Janet sneezed again as she glumly stared out her window, wondering how
> Billy would manage without her.
>
> At that moment, he was shimmying over Mrs. Jones' back fence. He
> waspleased and excited to be on his own, but sorry Janet wouldn't be
> there to see his triumph.
>
> As to your story specifically, some sort of tying together of the high
> school thread with the police station thread would be helpful IMO. Is
> this the same school the retiring cop attended fifty years ago? Is it
> the school his granddaughter attends? Is there some connection between
> him and the blind girl in the first section? Again, I know the
> kaleidoscopic style, where none of the storylines of a story or novel
> ever intersect, is fashionable just now. But, I like connections. To
> me, a story with connections is easier to follow and more enjoyable to
> read than one in which each storyline is isolated from the others.
>
> As to your question about how much, as blind writers, we should pander
> to the needs of screen readers: That's not how I look at it. We as
> blind and visually impaired writers perceive the world in a
> fundamentally different way than do fully sighted writers. Even those
> of us with a fair amount of eyesight, like myself, and who tend to be
> pretty visual in our writing, also like myself, use nonvisual queues,
> notice nonvisual input that the sighted writer is scarcely aware of.
> So, why not make use of these details? Why not write about the world
> as we perceive it? Doing that, we will not only make our work easier
> for our blind readers to read, whether they access it audibly or
> through braille, but we will also give our sighted readers a richer
> experience of our created world than they might otherwise have.
>
> I'm not saying to make special concessions for our blind readers, I'm
> just saying to be true to our identity and unique perspective as blind
> writers. If that means using more dialogue tags than might currently
> be in vogue, that's fine. If itmeans writing transitional passages
> rather than relying on white space or asterisks, fine. We aren't in
> competition with sighted writers. At least, we don't have to out-cool
> them with their current fads. We have to be the best damned writers we
> can be. And, if that means maybe being just a little old fashioned,
> just a little square but clear, easy to read, fun to read, then that's
> all right.
>
> Kerry
> _______________________________________________
> Writers Division web site:
> http://www.nfb-writers-division.org
> <http://www.nfb-writers-division.org/>
>
> stylist mailing list
> stylist at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/stylist_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> stylist:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/stylist_nfbnet.org/penatwork%40epix.net
>
>
>
>
>
> E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (7.0.0.514)
> Database version: 6.16660
> http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/
>
E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (7.0.0.514)
Database version: 6.16660
http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/
More information about the Stylist
mailing list