[stylist] Off-Topic Discussions

Donna Hill penatwork at epix.net
Tue Jun 7 21:38:18 UTC 2011


Paul,
My apologies to you as well. As I said, it was not an effort to generate a
discussion, just to put the info out there. I find it interesting that I get
more comments about stuff like this than when I posted a sample of my
writing a week ago.
Donna


-----Original Message-----
From: stylist-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:stylist-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
Behalf Of PAUL BAVER
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 12:27 PM
To: Writer's Division Mailing List
Subject: Re: [stylist] Off-Topic Discussions

Hello Neil I am in full agreement with you, I also joined to learn, and to 
read some of the very great information that this organization should, and 
does offer. Neil you and I will be getting in a lot of trouble, commenting 
this way, because there seams to be a control factor, by some members that 
always seam to have there own agendas, or rag to chew on, I have no answer 
why, but I guess with any organization  , or group, that's a problem that we

all will be forced to deal with. Thank you Neil for a very concerned 
observation. Paul E Baver
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Neil Butters" <neil.butters at sympatico.ca>
To: <stylist at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:56 AM
Subject: [stylist] Off-Topic Discussions


> Hello,
>
>
> I would like to address the use of this mailing list for off-topic 
> discussions, such as the recent NYC Blind Vendors postings and other 
> non-writing related topics.
>
> Shouldn't this list be restricted to writing topics only? I'm getting a 
> little bit tired of being flooded with off-topic back-and-forths, 
> political commentary, arguments and the like that belong elsewhere. Does 
> anyone else feel the same way? Shouldn't these posts be discouraged, or am

> I missing the point of this list.?
>
> One way we could deal with it, if people want such off-topic diatribe to 
> continue, would be to include the "Off-topic" designation in the subject 
> to tell readers that the post has nothing to do with writing. This doesn't

> really solve the "problem," though, since we could still receive many 
> off-topic messages.
>
> Neil
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Writers Division web site:
> http://www.nfb-writers-division.org <http://www.nfb-writers-division.org/>
>
> stylist mailing list
> stylist at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/stylist_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> stylist:
>
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/stylist_nfbnet.org/pebaver%40verizon.n
et
> 


_______________________________________________
Writers Division web site:
http://www.nfb-writers-division.org <http://www.nfb-writers-division.org/>

stylist mailing list
stylist at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/stylist_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
stylist:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/stylist_nfbnet.org/penatwork%40epix.ne
t




=======
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.17680)
http://www.pctools.com/
=======





=======
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.17680)
http://www.pctools.com/
=======




More information about the Stylist mailing list