[stylist] Web Site Issues

[Peter Donahue]

    Good morning everyone,

    I looked at the file size on the September 2011 Telephone Gathering and 
see that it is about 42 MB in size. If Robert can send me another copy so I 
can reuploaded in the event the file is corrupt I'll do it. Otherwise the 
entire recording should be there. You may have encountered a long gap of 
silence leading you to believe that the recording is too short. Please send 
more information so this can be looked in to further.

It's issues like this that cause me to not want to rush material to the Web 
site until I've had the chance to go through them with a fine tooth comb to 
be sure that inappropriate material is removed and that there are no other 
problems. There are a number of issues with the 2011 convention recording 
that really should be fixed before it's posted to the Web site one of which 
occurred during my report on the division Web site.

    I'll also look in to the problem with the 
Webmaster at nfb-writers-division.net address bouncing. All the best.

Peter Donahue



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bridgit Pollpeter" <bpollpeter at hotmail.com>
To: <stylist at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 1:10 AM
Subject: [stylist] Old English truly frustrates me


Jim,

Actually, the King James Bible and Shakespeare are not old English but
early modern English. Old English doesn't sound anything like modern
English instead sounding like a foreign language. Not only would old
English be incomprehensible to most of us, but written material in old
English would still follow medieval writing structure which was before
most grammar rules existed like spaces between words, punctuation,
capitalization and paragraphs.

Understanding early modern English can be difficult. Personally, I never
found "getting the gist" of early modern English difficult, but certain
words weren't familiar to me. It helps to read with a dictionary and any
study material you can find to supplement your reading. It may take some
longer to read material like this, and others can pick it up a bit
quicker. It's just a more archaic manner of speaking than we currently
speak, but it is modern English, not old English or even middle English,
but early modern English.

Sincerely,
Bridgit Kuenning-Pollpeter
Read my blog at:
http://blogs.livewellnebraska.com/author/bpollpeter/

"History is not what happened; history is what was written down."
The Expected One- Kathleen McGowan

Message: 8
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 16:45:34 +0000
From: "Homme, James" <james.homme at highmark.com>
To: Writer's Division Mailing List <stylist at nfbnet.org>
Subject: [stylist] Old English Truly Frustrates Me
Message-ID:
<BF85B26B8ED7B647ACAD9C68E89DA554D031 at HMBREXMP03.highmark.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi,
I went to http://www.poetry.org. I found some of the poems they show
from famous poets. Some of them are in English old, like the King James
Bible, but more cryptic. How do you begin to crack the code? <grin>

Jim


_______________________________________________
Writers Division web site:
http://www.nfb-writers-division.net <http://www.nfb-writers-division.org/>

stylist mailing list
stylist at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/stylist_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
stylist:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/stylist_nfbnet.org/pdonahue2%40satx.rr.com