[stylist] Reading scary/disturbing material

Bridgit Pollpeter bpollpeter at hotmail.com
Tue Jan 10 23:14:30 UTC 2012


Chris and others,

Here, here, smile! I completely agree with what you're saying. And
psychologically disturbing doesn't equate to horror, and novels using
historical, biographical/autobiographical and any other information
based on real life events and situations, though perhaps scary and
disturbing, don't really fit into the horror genre, though you can't say
this across the board. Like A Boy Called It is definitely disturbing,
but it is about a real situation, and though the circumstances may be
horrific, it's not horror genre. Now American Psycho, which is fiction,
though allegedly based on a real life person, would be classified as
psychological horror and probably just plain horror too since it's
extremely violent, graphic and about a serial killer. But I don't
believe in always censoring what we read; though I do make this comment
within reason since as established, some of us, yours truly included,
can only handle so much disturbing material, but nonetheless, reading
should entertain but also enlighten us. Many here are Christians, and
the Bible is chalk full of violent material. In fact, in terms of
literary considerations, it's been classified as one of the most violent
and graphic books ever written. And yet, many Christians argue this
enlightens and helps people better understand their faith. I'm not
addressing doctrine here, but trying to make a point that certain kinds
of "disturbing" material can enlighten and open us to other
possibilities, other ways of thinking. I think the seemingly senseless
murdering of women and children after the Israelites defeated their foes
is disturbing, or a man inviting a mob to rape his daughters just so two
guest were not sodomized is a pretty horrific scene to me, and yet these
two stories are in the Old Testament. Anyway, we all have our thresholds
for how much violence and graphic material we can handle, but I also
think we can't automatically write a novel off because of its genre
label.

Sincerely,
Bridgit Kuenning-Pollpeter
Read my blog at:
http://blogs.livewellnebraska.com/author/bpollpeter/
 
"History is not what happened; history is what was written down."
The Expected One- Kathleen McGowan

Message: 24
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:57:52 -0500
From: "Chris Kuell" <ckuell at comcast.net>
To: "Writer's Division Mailing List" <stylist at nfbnet.org>
Subject: [stylist] disturbing, entertaining and illuminating
Message-ID: <4DD5C4A277554DED8B9772473E1F5C50 at ChrisPC>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response

Vejas,

I actually think 'Snow Flower and the Secret Fan' was a great book, and 
would classify it as literary fiction--not horror or any other label you
can 
think of. Yes, the tying of the womens feet in China in the 1800s was 
horrible, but it was also real. That was a cultural thing they really 
did--even into the early 20th century. Class differences and seperation 
existed then, just as they do today, and in my view it was and still is 
tragic. The fact that the story stuck with you is a sign of great
writing, 
in my opinion. It made you think, made you feel, touched you emotionally
and 
stayed with you. In fact, it may even have changed you in some way--and 
isn't that the goal of our art form?
To me, the goal of writing is to entertain, and to illuminate. 'Snow
Flower and the Secret Fan' did both very well.

chris





More information about the Stylist mailing list