[Trainer-Talk] Bringing Back the Classic Outlook
Christopher Murphy
cjohnmurph at gmail.com
Mon Sep 21 15:18:22 UTC 2026
Good morning,
Thanks for your thoughts. I intend to explore it further fairly soon as a project that I'm going to give myself the goal of becoming more comfortable with it just to make sure that I am able to successfully use this.
--
Christopher Murphy
Email:
cjohnmurph at gmail.com
this is a CONFIDENTIAL communication and is not to be duplicated or forwarded to other individuals or organizations unless the email says otherwise. This electronic message, including all attachments, is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) named above and may contain legally privileged and confidential information. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled. If you received this message in error, please do not use, disclose, copy, or disseminate any of the information in this message. Please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the original message
-----Original Message-----
From: Trainer-Talk <trainer-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org> On Behalf Of Brian Vogel via Trainer-Talk
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2026 10:13 AM
To: List for teachers and trainers of adaptive technology <trainer-talk at nfbnet.org>
Cc: Brian Vogel <britechguy at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Trainer-Talk] Bringing Back the Classic Outlook
I also agree with Showe Trela.
I recently retired after more than 15 years of tutoring assistive technology, primarily screen readers, and stopped teaching Outlook Classic to anyone who was not already familiar with it or going to be in a work situation where it was the only option. It's going away, and it makes no sense to set someone up to have to relearn the UI for Microsoft's email client in 3 years, particularly if they're just using email, calendar, and contacts in typical fashion.
It has been perfectly fine, and completely accessible, for the normal day-to-day use cases that well over 90% of my clients actually have in practice. What's going on now, behind the scenes, is the migration of some of the more advanced capabilities that have been a part of Outlook Classic for a long time over to Outlook (new). But how many of us really use things like rules that trigger VBA scripts, as but one example of very low frequency use advanced features?
Outlook (new) is somewhat different from Outlook Classic but a very great many keyboard shortcuts that have been in use for decades are still entirely supported. The adjustments are, in my opinion, minimal and can be made in fairly short order.
Outlook (new) is both accessible and usable.
Brian Vogel
_______________________________________________
Trainer-Talk mailing list
Trainer-Talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/trainer-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Trainer-Talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/trainer-talk_nfbnet.org/cjohnmurph%40gmail.com
More information about the Trainer-Talk
mailing list