[Vendorsmi] Fw: Anderson Building Bid Process

Wed May 9 17:03:16 UTC 2012

Dear Mr. Eagle,

Don't worry your pretty little head about all this nonsense abut working and 
contributing to the commonweal ok? this is where you and others somehow 
jumped ship and lost sight of things. Come on man get a grip will you?

Now, you are starting to get it when you genuflect to the corporate state. 
You know your Catholic upbringing in these regards will serve us well, 
except we've erased the side that mentions, let alone alludes to any sort of 
social justice. This just isn't our bag ok?

Listen we aren't against the blind. Shoot we hardly notice you if we were 
aware to begin with and we wouldn't have noticed you at all if you weren't 
so bloody vocal to begin with. But, we digress once again...

So nothing personal here. We are equal opportunity offenders after all.

We don't mind the rule of law so long as it is our law. We don't mind 
democracy except that sort of thing is just so messy. It makes us ask for 
more napkins.

More napkins can you imagine that?

And we are sighted and we make this sort of mess. So how in the Sam Hill are 
you blind people supposed to lead yourselves out of this wilderness when we 
can't figure this stuff out?

Oops, this was a moment of transparency, and vulnerability.

Sorry about that. Never mind.

We are the Borg. Resistance is f u t i l e.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Terry Eagle" <terrydeagle at yahoo.com>
To: "'NFB of Michigan Vendors List'" <vendorsmi at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Vendorsmi] Fw: Anderson Building Bid Process

> Oh okay, I get it!  At least you are working 24/7 to make sure we are well
> taken care of by the Department of Welfare!  That certainly makes me feel
> better!  At least I will get more from welfare, than the highly acclaimed
> WORK and slave wages you are guaranteeing from Peckham Industries or New
> Horizon!  What do you mean, I MIGHT get work, if only the issue of
> conflict-of-interest is overlooked by the blind?  My hard earned degree
> doesn't give me an advantage for informed choice of work over welfare. 
> And
> how will I pay back my student loans on starvation wages or welfare?  Can 
> I
> really trust you?  You sound a lot the political candidates vying for my
> trust, support, and vote.  One even told me it looked as though I could
> afford to give up a few meals to trust him to use my donation for his
> election.  He said I'd giving back some of the government funds freely 
> given
> to me.  It was the patriotic and only just thing to do.  And when I asked
> him how I would then afford to pay my rent and student loans, he said,
> "Don't worry, if government officials can get away with not paying student
> loans, certainly they would look the other way for a poor, unemployed 
> blind
> person.  And if not, then I'd likely have a choice of housing--either jail
> or a tent with the occupy movement.".  He said if I went the occupy 
> movement
> route, I likely would not be found to account for my student loan
> obligation, since I'd constantly be moving from place-toplace, at the
> insistence of politicians.  I asked what he knew about accountability, and
> he simply replied, "Trust me.".  I don't know if I can and should trust 
> that
> guy? ----Original Message-----
> From: vendorsmi-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:vendorsmi-bounces at nfbnet.org] 
> On
> Behalf Of joe harcz Comcast
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:29 AM
> To: Joe Sontag; NFB of Michigan Vendors List
> Subject: Re: [Vendorsmi] Fw: Anderson Building Bid Process
>
> Dear All,
>
> We are very sorry for our untimely responses to all of your inquiries. We
> are most sensitive to the needs and wants and disturbances of you blinks 
> out
> there.  Oops we're sorry we meant to say, "You poor unfortunate sight
> challenged types. We are sincere. I mean trust us, but don't verify or try
> to hold us accountable you ungrateful wretches of this earth. Say, who is
> asking for this information anyways?
>
>
>
> I mean we are all busy don't you know?
>
> We're very busy carving up and dispensing with "pop stands" for the blind
> and all that. Screw the "State Plate" you fools. This isn't about one
> location and one priority. It is about it all. The whole enchilada you
> beggers at the banquet. Don't you know?
>
> Don't worry your pretty little heads about this all.  I mean that is what
> "Constance" tells us. You know you are all pretty to her and visa versa 
> for
> sure, we guess.... Don't worry about power plays, sexual favoritism let
> alone basic civil and human rights ok?
>
> Like we said it's complicated.
>
> I mean we've got to make up rules and law on the fly and then we've got to
> adjust them to our given practices and all that. Like we said it's
> complicated.
>
> Please don't be so pesky. Did we say pesky? Oops sorry, we meant to say
> other things that weren't so nice and so politic. But, we don't have the
> outright gonads to say what is really on our minds.
>
>
> Listen you don't have the muscle or the constituency to fight this fight.
> You are pimples on the political elephant's backside don't you know? We 
> are
> the Borg. We are relentless and your efforts in resistance are futile.
>
> Oh by the by don't worry about those sellouts and hacks like Zanger and
> Hull. We don't give a rip about them either though these suck asses don't
> know they are simply Judas Goats leading others to the slaughter house and
> they too will be slaughtered in the name of openness, efficiency and 
> goodly
> corporate government too. Though we'll transfer for a moment in time 
> Zanger
> and Hull and their ilk to unemployment for a time, or, perhaps we'll make
> them promotional agents for the lottery until they hit the "big one". We
> haven't decided their fate just yet.
>
>
> Why are you bothering us with your inquiries? Don't you know we are busy
> making up State and National constitutional Law as we go and on the fly 
> and
> behind closed doors? Isn't this the roll of government of the corporation
> and by the corporation and for the corporation after all? And, please,
> please, and pretty please don't you all recognize that corporations are
> people too?
>
> I mean "prick us and do we not bleed" and all that?
>
>
>
> Say, if you believe anything we've got to say then we've got a bridge to
> Ontario to sell you!
>
> We don't need a new bridge by the way because our corporate funder has 
> given
> us a whole lot of money and promised free air fare to anywhere. Besides 
> who
> cars, we mean cares,  about land travel nowadays and anyways? But, we
> digress...
>
> Don't bother your pretty and pathetic selves with the nuances of your 
> basic
> human and civil rights. We are now re-writing and re-working law and 
> equity
> and those sorts of things like we said and we're making it all up as we go
> along, which is hard work.
>
> Don't you dare worry us with mortgage payments, food, and medical needs 
> and
> that sort of stuff please!
>
> After all we're working for increased governmental efficiency. And we're 
> now
> designing as we write bridges to nowhere. I mean we've got to feed the
> masses and we've got to give some fodder to our constants after all.
>
>
> Oh yes, and if you all think this is just a Republican dictatorship of
> benign character then I want to introduce you all to my pal Andy Dillon, a
> goodly "Democrat". Let's face it we are tall technocrats. we mean well.
> We're all about efficiency. We like not those weirdoes like Hitler. He was
> just too strong for our taste.
>
> But, that Mussolini was a good egg and he made those trains run on time.
>
> We really don't hate government like the papers say. In fact we love it 
> just
> so long as we run it and for our corporate interests.
>
> And remember this: we don't have to make the bloody =trains run on time 
> just
> so long as we make sure and certain that there are no trains to begin 
> with.
>
> so, in full circle we don't care at all about this bid. We are busy
> re-writing the law of this land in fact and in deed to eliminate not only
> the state, but also the federal priority concerning you bblinks and your
> pathetic pop stands. If we could eliminate you we would you arrogent blind
> people. But, that would be unseemly and it would be like we even knew you
> existed in the first place after all, which you don't by the way.
>
>
> Signed,
>
> The Snyder Borg
>
> A cross disability, cross party equal opportunity offender of basic
> democracy
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Joe Sontag <mailto:suncat0 at gmail.com>
> To: VENDORSMI List <mailto:vendorsmi at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 9:39 PM
> Subject: [Vendorsmi] Fw: Anderson Building Bid Process
>
> Yes, it will be very interesting to learn what the assistant AG has
> to say.  Some of us had things to say, but almost nobody wanted to know,
> with the exception of the Commission Board.  And why did the Board go 
> along?
> It might have had something to do with a message from BEP staff and EOC
> leadership that there was no choice other than their proposal.  For 
> whatever
> reason, the Board heard only the Agency version of the issue before giving
> its support.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Terry Eagle <mailto:terrydeagle at yahoo.com>
> To: 'Joe Sontag' <mailto:suncat0 at gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 19:51
> Subject: FW: Anderson Building Bid Process
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: Zanger, Connie (LARA) [mailto:zangerc at michigan.gov]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 3:38 PM
> To: 'terrydeagle at yahoo.com' <mailto:'terrydeagle at yahoo.com'>
> Cc: Cannon, Patrick (LARA); Luzenski, Sue (LARA); Hull, James
> (LARA); Larry Posont MCB Comm.; lydia Schuck MCB Comm.; John Scott MCB
> Comm.; 'Fred Wurtzel'; Hazell Brooks; 'James Chaney'; Bob Essenberg
> Subject: FW: Anderson Building Bid Process
>
>
>
> Good afternoon, Terry;
>
>
>
> It has, indeed, been several weeks since the deadline for submission
> of bid proposals for the Anderson Building cafeteria.  Members of the E O 
> C
> responsible for evaluating the proposals have completed their review of 
> the
> submissions.
>
>
>
> Since the bid solicitation was issued, the Attorney General has
> questioned the process set forth by both the Elected Committee and the
> Commission Board for identifying a qualified bidder for the Anderson
> Building cafeteria.  At present, Commission staff is awaiting the 
> Assistant
> Attorney General's written recommendation on the matter.
>
>
>
> We apologize for this delay and hope to be able to provide updated
> information in the near future.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Constance Zanger
>
> Business Enterprise Program Manager
>
> Michigan Commission for the Blind
>
> 517/335.3639
>
> 517/335.5140 (facsimile)
>
>
>
> "To contract new debts is not the way to pay old ones."
>
> GEORGE WASHINGTON, in a April 7, 1799 letter to James Welch
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: Cannon, Patrick (LARA)
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 9:41 AM
> To: Zanger, Connie (LARA)
> Subject: FW: Anderson Building Bid Process
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: Terry Eagle [mailto:terrydeagle at yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 9:45 AM
> To: Cannon, Patrick (LARA)
> Cc: '"MCB Commissioner Larry Posont"'; '"MCB Commissioner Lydia
> Schuck"'; '"MC B Commissioner John Scott"'
> Subject: Anderson Building Bid Process
>
>
>
> Friday, May 4, 2012
>
>
>
> Good morning,
>
>
>
> It has been nearly six weeks since the deadline for submission of
> bid proposals for the Anderson Building cafeteria.
>
>
>
> It is my understanding absolutely no communication has been made to
> the bidders.  How can such a fact be professionally possible?
>
>
>
> What is the status of the bid review, interview, and award process?
>
>
>
>
> Thank you in advance for your timely, professional response to this
> inquiry.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Terry Eagle
>
> Friday, May 4, 2012
>
>
>
> Good morning,
>
>
>
> It has been nearly six weeks since the deadline for submission of
> bid proposals for the Anderson Building cafeteria.
>
>
>
> It is my understanding absolutely no communication has been made to
> the bidders.  How can such a fact be professionally possible?
>
>
>
> What is the status of the bid review, interview, and award process?
>
>
>
>
> Thank you in advance for your timely, professional response to this
> inquiry.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Terry Eagle
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vendorsmi mailing list
> Vendorsmi at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/vendorsmi_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
> for Vendorsmi:
>
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/vendorsmi_nfbnet.org/joeharcz%40comcast.ne
> t
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vendorsmi mailing list
> Vendorsmi at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/vendorsmi_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> Vendorsmi:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/vendorsmi_nfbnet.org/joeharcz%40comcast.net 