[nfb-talk] Losing DVS

John G. Heim jheim at math.wisc.edu
Thu Jan 15 14:56:20 UTC 2009

Well, fine. But how is that possible when there used to be a FCC regulation 
that required DVS and the NFB helped that regulation be struck down in 
court. I don't suppose you bothered to read the discussion at the URL I 
quoted, did you? I suppose not because you're not really interested in 
considering that I may be right.

Otherwise, please explain to me why the NFB can be considered blameless when 
TV and movie producers used the NFB's own statements in their argument 
against the regulations requiring DVS.  The NFB helped the TV producers win 
that case, right? Why then, should I not hold the NFB partially to blame for 
losing DVS?

It's a fair question.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "T. Joseph Carter" <carter.tjoseph at gmail.com>
To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Losing DVS

> They're saying the NFB has little or nothing to do with what WI Public 
> Telivision does or does not provide in any feed.
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 05:27:35PM -0500, Joel Zimba wrote:
>> so they two of you are saying that WI Public Television is in fact 
>> including the DVS signal in their digital feed?
>> Joel
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org

More information about the nFB-Talk mailing list