[nfb-talk] [NFB-talk] Here We GoAgain: Home Makeover-blindcouple in OH

[Mike Freeman]

In actuality, only the Government is truly prohibited from limiting free 
speech.  Religious entities do it every day. <smile>

Happy Holidays!

Mike

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John G. Heim" <john at johnheim.net>
To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] [NFB-talk] Here We GoAgain: Home 
Makeover-blindcouple in OH


> Well, I guess if that's your definition  of "baiting".  I think that's a 
> bit strong though.
>
> Anyway, I think you are over reacting. Some people got a little hot but so 
> what? The issues themselves are what is important. There are always new 
> people on the list and new information is always coming out. For example, 
> after William said he thought there were newer resolutions than those I 
> had been mentioning, I went out and looked it up. Sure enough, there was 
> another resolution in 2008.
>
> I understand that at times there are good reasons to limit free speech. 
> But that some people find a particular topic or person annoying is not one 
> of them.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David Andrews" <dandrews at visi.com>
> To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 11:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] [NFB-talk] Here We Go Again: Home 
> Makeover-blindcouple in OH
>
>
>> John:
>>
>> I will add, to my previous message by saying that we have been through 
>> this again and again for the past two years or longer, you have said the 
>> same things, we have said the same things etc.  Nothing has changed -- so 
>> to that extent you are baiting us.  You know what you believe, and you 
>> know what response you will get, yet you do it again and again.
>>
>> While I don't want to be portrayed as being against free speech, which I 
>> am not, I am close to declaring this, and some other threads off topic. 
>> Their continued discussion is doing no one any good!
>>
>> David Andrews, Moderator
>>
>> At 01:04 PM 12/11/2010, you wrote:
>>>David, I'm not "baiting" you with anything. I'm stating cold, hard
>>>facts. I would be only too happy if the NFB had changed its position
>>>on accessible signals. Has it? If you have information in that regard,
>>>I'd be only too happy to hear it.
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nfb-talk mailing list
>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org