[Blind-rollers] seatbelts
Erica Cole
rebellion220 at hotmail.com
Tue May 11 21:42:15 UTC 2010
Courtney,
I really agree with you about assessing your own risk re: seatbelts.
Urgh! *throws hands in air* paternalism really bugs me.
I don't travel in my chair because I have the mobility etc to sit on a car
seat. I don't trust the people I deal with on a daily basis to do a 4-point
tie-down correctly, plus I don't like the feeling of going backwards or
sideways.
Just my two cents.
Erica in the UK.
-----Original Message-----
From: blind-rollers-bounces at nfbnet.org
[mailto:blind-rollers-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Courtney Stover
Sent: 11 May 2010 20:12
To: Blind wheelchair users list
Subject: Re: [Blind-rollers] seatbelts
Becky,
You have some extremely valid points there. People with disabilities can
often allow their pride to overcome their good sense. However, as your
example illustrates, so can the able-bodied. To me, having an equal playing
field means having the basic right to be as idiotic as the able-bodied can
be. That doesn't mean we should be, however. I admire you for assessing
your risk and acting accordingly.
I understand your sarcasm completely and don't take it personally in the
slightest. There are a number of radical elements in the movement, many of
which I deal with on a regular basis; a healthy dose of sarcasm can pull us
up short and make us reconsider our positions
*smile*
I'd like to address a couple of things that were brought to my attention
offlist about this topic. Several people said that careless/lazy/untrained
drivers can often use the fact that wheelchair users refused the seatbelt as
an excuse for not using proper procedures. As a general question, how
prevalent do you think this sort of action is? For those of you who support
the law, is the negligence on the part of drivers most of the reason you do
support it?
This list has been rather quiet, so it's good to see some discussion.
Courtney
On 5/11/10, Becky Frankeberger <b.butterfly at comcast.net> wrote:
> So the abled bodied gal sitting across the isle from me had the choice
> before that van stopped suddenly to use her seatbelt. She flew
> further then I did. She bloodied her knee. I was shaken but fine as
> I said I held on for dear life to my secured chair. I am to fragil to
> not be careful. But honestly that gal was bleeding needlessly. Pride
> not good sense ruled. Not assessing the risk just stupid pride. Not
> adult good sense, but childish pride. Sitting on that floor she sure
> did not look like a first class citizen as everyone babied her. I felt
> as stupid as she looked as I forgot to ask the driver for a seat belt.
> Now wasn't I being second class. First class people go the extra mile
> and not cross in the middle of the street like the second class
> sighted do. First class people are not fond of being projectiles, nor
> sitting on floors of busses bleeding, like the second class sighted
> do. Oh hey like leaving a baby in an nonsecured stroller. That was
> fun watching the baby fly down the isle of the buss. Kind of a good
lesson to me on my wheels, don't you think?
>
> Sorry feeling sarcastic.
>
> I absolutely agree with your point about paternalism. But not
> balancing that with good sense is just second class.
> I am not not saying you don't have good sense. I am reacting to the
> radicalism I have seen in some disabled, which to me is second class.
> There is indeed a fine line.
>
> Becky and Jake
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blind-rollers-bounces at nfbnet.org
> [mailto:blind-rollers-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Courtney Stover
> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 3:14 PM
> To: Blind wheelchair users list
> Subject: Re: [Blind-rollers] seatbelts
>
> Hi:
>
> I may very well be in the minority here, but I agree with the former
> member of the disability council. We, as disabled individuals, should
> have the right to assess our risk and make a decision about restraints
> based on that assessment. Having non-disabled people assessing those
> risks does lead to paternalism, and we deal with enough of that as it
> is. I can certainly understand the concerns of caregivers about
> safety, but often, our caregivers themselves can exhibit too much
> overprotectiveness. And because we are already considered childlike
> by so many of the powers that be, they tend to ascent to whatever
> parents or others think best.
> Courtney
>
> On 5/10/10, Becky Frankeberger <b.butterfly at comcast.net> wrote:
>> Do you all use seatbelts? I sure do. Do you make sure it is a four
>> point tie down? I sure do as someone forgot and I bounced backwards
>> nearly tipping me backwards. Do you do a lap and shoulder belt? I
>> do as I had
> to
>> hold on for dear life as the van stopped kind of suddenly. Or is
>> equal treatment more important then safety. If my able bodied
>> counterparts do
> not
>> have to use seatbelts or four point tie downs why should I, according
>> to
> Lex
>> in the article..
>>
>> What do you all think of "equal treatment.
>>
>> Becky and Jake
>>
>> Bus seat belt laws mostly exclude wheelchairs By JOHN SEEWER
>> ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER TOLEDO, Ohio -- Lonnie Acton's lifeless body
>> sat in a wheelchair fastened
> to
>> the
>> floor of a mangled minibus. No shoulder or lap belt protected him.
>> Those restraints, attached to the bus, are specially made to secure
>> passengers in their wheelchairs. They weren't being used when a
>> tractor-trailer slid across a snowy highway and slammed into the bus
>> in January, killing Acton and two other residents of a special-needs
>> center in western Ohio.
>> While federal law requires buses to be equipped with straps that lock
>> down wheelchairs, as well as seat belts and shoulder harnesses to
>> secure passengers themselves, laws in Ohio and most states don't
>> require that people in wheelchairs on small buses and vans actually
>> wear the seat belts - even though they're vulnerable to injuries from
>> being tossed around in an accident.
>> "It just doesn't make any sense," said Acton's stepfather, Steve Hoessli.
>> "If they're
>> required to have restraints, why aren't they required to use them?"
>> A review by The Associated Press of seat belt laws in all states
>> found
> just
>> five
>> - Arkansas, Georgia, Minnesota, Washington and Wisconsin - that
>> require
> both
>> wheelchairs
>> and their users to be secured on paratransit buses that help people
>> in wheelchairs to travel to work, doctor's offices and shopping
>> centers.
>> Just a handful of other states require seat belt use for wheelchairs,
>> with some exceptions.
>> Oregon requires buckling up on commercial buses with less than 16
>> seats
> but
>> says
>> nothing about floor restraints. New Jersey limits its requirements to
>> passenger cars and vans. North Carolina's law doesn't mention
>> wheelchairs, but a state police spokesman said the rules cover nearly
>> all vehicles.
>> It's not known how many people riding in wheelchairs are injured in
> vehicle
>> accidents
>> because little data are available.
>> University of Michigan researchers have found 52 auto crashes
>> involving wheelchairs during the past three years. While not a
>> comprehensive list, the accident data show that simply strapping a
>> wheelchair to the floor of a bus or van wasn't enough protection.
>> In most of the crashes the wheelchairs were secured. However, seat
>> belts weren't always used or fastened the right way, and in some
>> instances, people slid from under lap belts and were injured.
>> "By and large, many of these injuries are preventable if the
>> restraints
> had
>> been
>> used, or used properly," said Gina Bertocci, a professor who works in
>> wheelchair transportation safety at the University of Louisville.
>> A survey of wheelchair users who ride on public and private
>> transportation found in 2007 that one in seven never used restraints,
>> mainly because drivers didn't take time or know how to secure their
>> wheelchairs and lap belts, according to Easter Seals Project Action,
>> a program that helps the disabled with transportation.
>> "I've seen drivers who drop off the kids and they're in a hurry so
>> they don't take time for each chair," said Margaret Griscti, of North
>> Brunswick, N.J.,
> whose
>> son,
>> Stephen, broke his leg when his wheelchair tipped over in a vehicle.
>> That accident nearly 10 years ago and other crashes led to New
>> Jersey's
> 2008
>> law,
>> which includes fines for violators.
>> Acton's relatives hope Ohio lawmakers now will take another look at
>> their state's seat belt laws.
>> Crash investigators were surprised, too, that seat belts aren't
>> required
> for
>> people
>> in wheelchairs. "I guess I thought there would be something," said
>> State Highway Patrol Lt. Craig Cvetan.
>> There's no guarantee restraints would have saved Acton, a 28-year-old
>> born with spina bifida, because he died of multiple injuries. The
>> only thing keeing him in his seat was a strap designed to help him
>> sit up, not protect him in an accident.
>> His stepfather pointed out that Acton was in the back of the bus and
>> that most of the damage was up front. A man in a wheelchair across
>> from Acton survived even though he, too, did not have lap and
>> shoulder belts.
>> The bus driver also died, and six passengers were injured. Three of
>> the survivors had on lap belts, according to accident reports.
>> Two employees on the bus told investigators that they usually
>> attached the lap and shoulder belts for passengers in wheelchairs,
>> but not always, and that
> they
>> didn't
>> know who secured Acton before the accident.
>> Administrators at the Creative Learning Workshop in Springfield,
>> Ohio,
> which
>> operated
>> the bus, referred all questions to the company's attorney, Steve
>> Freeze,
> who
>> did
>> not return messages seeking comment.
>> Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the decision on whether to
>> use the safety restraints on buses and paratransit vans is left up to
>> the wheelchair
> users
>> and bus
>> operators. The law says passengers riding on buses in wheelchairs can
>> be told to buckle up only if everyone else aboard must wear a seat
>> belt.
>> The law sets out to treat people with disabilities the same as anyone
> else,
>> said
>> Lex Frieden, a former head of the National Council on Disability who
> helped
>> draft
>> the ADA in the mid-1980s.
>> "If we're not going to require the general public to wear seat belts
>> on buses, we shouldn't require people with disabilities," he said.
>> "Clearly, one could argue we need to look after the well-being of the
>> people using these vehicles, but that leads us to a patronizing
>> approach."
>> Some operators of small buses do require all passengers to be belted,
>> setting standards that vary by city, according to interviews with
>> transit managers. And some transit operators, especially those that
>> are government-funded, say it's too risky not to make everyone buckle
>> up.
>> "It's a liability issue," said Robert Hiett, who oversees a rural
>> paratransit service in Griffin, Ga., that requires seat belts for
>> all. "If we didn't properly secure them and there's an accident, we'd
>> get in all kinds of problems. Defending one lawsuit could put us out
>> of business."
>> Larry Schneider, a research professor at the University of Michigan's
>> Transportation Research Institute, said he hopes legislation being
>> considered in Massachusetts will become a model for other states. The
>> proposal would require wheelchairs
> and
>> users
>> to be secured on all paratransit buses and vans and require training
>> for caregivers.
>> Paula Cieplik and her 35-year-old son, Kenny, of Middleborough,
>> Mass., pushed for the proposal after he was injured in a crash a year
>> ago when the seat
> belts
>> holding
>> him in his wheelchair broke, throwing him out of his seat.
>> "The people who are most vulnerable aren't protected," she said.
>> "It's mind-boggling."
>> -
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
> signature
>> database 5103 (20100510) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blind-rollers mailing list
>> Blind-rollers at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-rollers_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> Blind-rollers:
>>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blind-rollers_nfbnet.org/liamski
> tten%4
> 0gmail.com
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-rollers mailing list
> Blind-rollers at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-rollers_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Blind-rollers:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blind-rollers_nfbnet.org/b.butte
> rfly%4
> 0comcast.net
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
> signature database 5103 (20100510) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
> signature database 5105 (20100511) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-rollers mailing list
> Blind-rollers at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-rollers_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Blind-rollers:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blind-rollers_nfbnet.org/liamski
> tten%40gmail.com
>
_______________________________________________
Blind-rollers mailing list
Blind-rollers at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-rollers_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
Blind-rollers:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blind-rollers_nfbnet.org/rebellion220%
40hotmail.com
More information about the Blind-Rollers
mailing list