[blindlaw] Exam$ software and law school exams

[Steve P. Deeley]

When I attended law school in 1978, I was not allowed to take the LSAT. 
However, I was not granted extra time for the exams.  I guess they would 
have granted the extra time if I had requested it.  No one offered the extra 
time.
Steve
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <ckrugman at sbcglobal.net>
To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 2:27 AM
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Exam$ software and law school exams


> In reality before technology blind studentswere done at the same time as
> their sighted classmates and continue to do so. Over the years I have 
> taken
> many law courses and while I may have been allowed extra time I very 
> seldom
> actually needed to use it. At times this was quite a shock to professors.
> Chuck
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Blaine Deutscher" <b.m.deutscher at sasktel.net>
> To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 5:56 AM
> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Exam$ software and law school exams
>
>
>> I'm not sure what it's like in the sattes but isn't the bar a two day
>> process? do blind people get time and a half to write the exam or how 
>> does
>> that work? It's something to look into now as I'm always trying to make
>> lives better for future students so if I speak with the law school in
>> Saskatchewan they might have some blind people before me that have gone
>> through and whatever system they used worked. I know some people will say
>> "blind people before you went through without technology so what did they
>> do?" My response to that is yes they did but now that technology is there
>> and we are using it more exams should be easier to take. I'm waiting for
>> the
>> day that a blind person can keep up with his classmates with the four
>> courses or whatever it takes to be done the same time that they are.
>>
>> Blaine
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Kate Carroll" <carroll.kathryn.e at gmail.com>
>> To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 6:52 AM
>> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Exam$ software and law school exams
>>
>>
>> Thank you Aser. I was not aware that I might be going through the exact
>> same
>> thing with the Bar.
>>
>> Kate
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Aser Tolentino
>> <agtolentino at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> My school and the CA bar use ExamSoft. While I've heard talk of greater
>>> accessibility now, at the time I started law school three years ago it
>>> was
>>> not possible to run a screen reader alongside the software; I confirmed
>>> this
>>> with the sample test and by speaking to the school's IT department. My
>>> advice would be to request the school forgo your use of the software as 
>>> a
>>> testing accommodation. The issue will come up again when you take the 
>>> bar
>>> and could be more contentious then.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Aser
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Kate Carroll
>>> <carroll.kathryn.e at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>> > Good evening everyone!
>>> >
>>> > I am looking for some advice concerning law school exams. If anyone 
>>> > has
>>> any
>>> > thoughts on my question, i would greatly appreciate hearing them.
>>> >
>>> > I am in my first year of law school. I currently use a Dell Latitutde
>>> with
>>> > Windows 7, and ZoomText for magnification and reading. I will have to
>>> > use
>>> > the software Exam4 for my upcoming exams. I have heard that this
>>> > software
>>> > will likely prevent ZoomText (and possibly the built-in Windows
>>> > magnification program) from working if I attempt to use them during an
>>> > exam.
>>> > I havent actually tested the problem with the tech guys at the school
>>> > because I need to get a Zoomtext license and right now don't have
>>> Zoomtext
>>> > on my laptop.
>>> >
>>> > Does anyone have experience with this Exam4 software, and is a user of
>>> > ZoomText? What did you do to get around this (alleged)  problem? Any
>>> ideas,
>>> > again, are welcome.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Kate
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Kathryn CARROLL
>>> > St. John's University College of Law 2013
>>> > 631-521-318 C
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > blindlaw mailing list
>>> > blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>> > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>>> > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>> > blindlaw:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/agtolentino%40gmail.com
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> blindlaw mailing list
>>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>> blindlaw:
>>>
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/carroll.kathryn.e%40gmail.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Kathryn CARROLL
>> St. John's University College of Law 2013
>> 631-521-318 C
>> _______________________________________________
>> blindlaw mailing list
>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> blindlaw:
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/b.m.deutscher%40sasktel.net
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> blindlaw mailing list
>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> blindlaw:
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ckrugman%40sbcglobal.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> blindlaw:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/stevep.deeley%40insightbb.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.856 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3162 - Release Date: 09/27/10 
02:34:00
-------------- next part --------------

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.856 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3162 - Release Date: 09/27/10 02:34:00